New study confirms the oceans are warming rapidly

Thank you for confirming that no believer in evolution, GW, black holes, and in even more idiotic belief such as multiple universes can never ever come up with anything else but spewing an insult like a mad dog spewing saliva.

I greatly appreciate and I will let the American public, including illegal aliens to choose between freedom and and slavery.

And thank you again for submitting no objection to any statement I made, but trying to bite my hand.


(The secret is that I put a thick robber glove on before I let it be licked by a toothless troll.)

Try again.

 

Now you are getting closer to the correct word or phrase.

"What it should be" is a range of temperature absent an obscene amount of long term pollution imposed by humanity. But that is unrealistic. What I would prefer to see is a temperature range similar to the one during which the currently living plants and animals (including humans) evolved and thrived.

With the current CO2 concentration already at rates not experienced in the last 3 million years, I am afraid that goal is unrealistic as well.

 

get a grip on reality and stop spewing nonsense

 

i know that you parrot nonsense, i posted the data three times

 

why use ground data up to 1995 and then switch to satellite data? seems questionable not using the same measuring procedure. Why not post the ground data from 1995-2015 so its a direct comparison? I already have a good idea why though..

 

True enough. The distortion of the ground based data pretty much makes it meaningless.

 

Wait...are you saying that you don't accept black holes either?

 

they use the best data they have

 

They use data manipulated to get the desired result.

 

you're parroting nonsense from big-oil lobbyists

 

or they wanted to show the desired results they wanted..



https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/mslUSTrendsTable.htm

https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/mslGlobalTrendsTable.htm

 

here's the relevant information noaa is disseminating:

"Global sea level has been rising over the past century, and the rate has increased in recent decades. In 2014, global sea level was 2.6 inches above the 1993 average—the highest annual average in the satellite record (1993-present). Sea level continues to rise at a rate of about one-eighth of an inch per year.

Higher sea levels mean that deadly and destructive storm surges push farther inland than they once did, which also means more frequent nuisance flooding. Disruptive and expensive, nuisance flooding is estimated to be from 300 percent to 900 percent more frequent within U.S. coastal communities than it was just 50 years ago."

https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sealevel.html


i found this image using the 'search function' on the page you linked (noaa):

https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends.html

their desired results are facts based on the most accurate data

 

the sea has been rising sense the little ice age..

and there is been no increase in the last decade. there is more stations that has stayed the same or decreased then increased like the satellite data you showed earlier. But of course showing charts like this below will not strike fear in the hearts of liberals..

https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.htm?stnid=030-018
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.htm?stnid=025-001
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.htm?stnid=040-001
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=1619000
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.htm?stnid=010-001
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_global_station.htm?stnid=015-011

 

This is what you posted three times:

And this the truth you could not address a single word of which and which sent you into the state of total indecency and total denial of reality:

"Your definition of a scientific theory has to use the word evolution twice in 5 short sentences.


It can only mean if one does not know what the theory of biological evolution is about one cannot know what a is a scientific theory and what is garbage.


It can only mean that for 200 years starting from the scientific revolution by Newton people created volumes the most fundamental and valid to the present day physical theories, but they couldn’t know what was a scientific theory and what was garbage because because evolution was not made up yet..


One has to know nothing about nothing or in other words be a believer in evolution and GW in order to not to see how idiotic is such a suggestion.

Not taking existing standards and not applying them to evolution, but using evolution as a standard backwards is a perversion.

You have just demonstrated again that believers in GW know nothing about nothing and have quite perverted minds.

American Association for the Advancement of Science must have no credibility in any conversation about science because of the total idiocy of its statements. "

Keep on parroting idiocy after idiocy between spitting insults.

Spit again.

 

Your definition of a scientific theory has to use the word evolution twice in 5 short sentences.


It can only mean if one does not know what the theory of biological evolution is about one cannot know what a is a scientific theory and what is garbage.


It can only mean that for 200 years starting from the scientific revolution by Newton people created volumes the most fundamental and valid to the present day physical theories, but they couldn’t know what was a scientific theory and what was garbage because because evolution was not made up yet..


One has to know nothing about nothing or in other words be a believer in evolution and GW in order to not to see how idiotic is such a suggestion.

Not taking existing standards and not applying them to evolution, but using evolution as a standard backwards is a perversion.

You have just demonstrated again that believers in GW know nothing about nothing and have quite perverted minds.

American Association for the Advancement of Science must have no credibility in any conversation about science because of the total idiocy of its statements.

 

sea-level has been rising faster, due to global warming

"Sea level rise is caused primarily by two factors related to global warming: the added water from melting ice sheets and glaciers and the expansion of sea water as it warms. The first graph tracks the change in sea level since 1993 as observed by satellites.

The second graph, derived from coastal tide gauge data, shows how much sea level changed from about 1870 to 2000."



https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/

 

learn how to think logically, the definition has nothing to do with me and it's correct, despite all the nonsense you posted

 

Yawn. That isn't much. Sea Levels have risen 400 feet in the last 20,000 years, or a one-fourth of an inch a year. So the current rate is half that.

 

it's a rate that, if continued, will continue to cause huge damages

https://sealevel.nasa.gov/understanding-sea-level/projections/empirical-projections

try to think logically, the oldest cities in the usa are less than 450 years old

so sea level rises before that aren't relevant now

 

Why would it stop? It's been rising for 20,000 years, and sure the rate has halved, but the smart money is that it will continue. 125,000 years ago, during the last inter-glacial, sea levels were 20 feet higher than today. You think that just because it's inconvenient to Progressive Coastal Gentry that the seas will stop their now 20,000 year rise, simply because you demand it?

How silly!

Consult an elevation map and site your home and business accordingly. If you aren't smart enough to do that, who's fault is it?

If you were dumb enough to site your home or business in the path of the rising ocean, sell now, before everyone else catches on. And show some brains, and get an elevation map before you make your next purchase.

Jeeze!

 

it could stop if we stopped putting so much co2 into the atmosphere

but it would take a while

you're projecting what your own comments are

 

Just another spit as it was predicted.

Real scientific method requires a demonstration, and it requires predictions to come undoubtedly true.

Thank you for another demonstration for incapability of believers in GW, evolution black holes, global climate and other things FAKE scientists believe in except for just one belief in one God.

That is 79,200,000 beliefs in 0.47 seconds.

https://www.google.com/search?q=sci...hrome&ie=UTF-8#q=scientists+believe+that+-god

79,200,000 beliefs in 0.47 seconds would make anyone totally crazy.

Thank you for the demonstration that the claimed property of CO2 has never ever been demonstrated and thus it is a big miserable FAKE.

Spit again.

 

what a bunch of malarkey you're posting

 

no it has not..
https://www.rt.com/usa/332226-climate-change-sea-level-rise/

 

what a joke, notice how i posted what nasa actually says, straight from nasa

as opposed to that malarkey you posted from 'russia times'