Pro-Life? Adopt a kid!!!

WHY?


Liberals aren't the ones saying that life in the womb is "precious" but the minute it's born it isn't....that would be righties..

 

I've been a foster parent for 10+ years and I've adopted 2.

 

YOU don’t pay for anything in America. You just keep flapping your feminazi rhetoric to citizens in a country where you have no stake. Doesn’t Australia have its own political discussion that needs you?
The truth of the matter, is that a huge percentage of abortions are a matter of convenience, and a way to shirk responsibility for their own actions, NOBODY forced these women to engage in sexual relationships without birth control.

 

OMGAWD! You got something right !

YES, a thousand times YES, abortions are done when a woman thinks giving birth will be inconvenient....now YOU can go through life doing everything as INconveniently as possible but most people would think that's silly.


Having an abortion IS taking responsibility for one's actions. It's quite IRResponsible to have a kid one can't afford or doesn't want.


No one said these women were forced to have sex, so what if they weren't....they ALSO shouldn't be forced to gestate...

...and NO one is obligated to put drugs or foreign objects in one's body.....

 

NOt any more viability is now at about 4.5 months 21 weeks is more than half way that is late term no matter how you wish to parse it.

 

Yeah killing your unborn child is being resposnible for your actions to exactly the same extent that robbing a bank is being responsible for your previous financial indiscretions.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
OMGAWD! You got something right !

YES, a thousand times YES, abortions are done when a woman thinks giving birth will be inconvenient....now YOU can go through life doing everything as INconveniently as possible but most people would think that's silly.


Having an abortion IS taking responsibility for one's actions. It's quite IRResponsible to have a kid one can't afford or doesn't want.


No one said these women were forced to have sex, so what if they weren't....they ALSO shouldn't be forced to gestate...

...and NO one is obligated to put drugs or foreign objects in one's body.....

Nope, no analogy there at all....

Oh, here's something you "missed"

garyd said: ↑
A few thousand women a year."""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""





FoxHastings: Where? What were the conditions? Where are the stats and REASONS they did that?????

 

You preach it as "choice".

You had a choice earlier. Have unprotected sex, and risk pregnancy, or not.

 

I have. How many immigrant children have you opened your home to?

How bout this one, if you don't want a child you are going to end up murdering, use birth control.
And this one, if you believe in murdering unborn humans, you should probably sit out the whole kids in cages debate.

 

I made the case that a few thousand women a year have late term abortions, I then produced the data showing it. It is also well known now that the early limit for viability is about 18 weeks not 21 weeks. How many late term abortions are non viable I have no idea hell I'm not even sure they bother with such stats. And the analogy is spot on.

 

My wife and I had plenty of fun for 8 years until we planned to have a child. What do you know, when we stopped all birth control methods, my wife got pregnant. Give me a break with this birth control doesn't work garbage.

 

Not from low income folks in almost every state. It is no one else's fault if you get pregnant.

 

Victorian England, lol. Try 1975. I'm sorry you are so opposed to personal responsibility. Also, I'm not a Republican and they don't want your hyperbolic child labor straw man.

 

I care dearly for my children and other children in my family. I will gladly make sure no one has to support them. However, I do like your moral high ground as you confiscate money at the end of a gun to redistribute wealth as part of an elitist power maintenance plan.

 

Health department. She was broke college student.

 

Wrong. It's illogical and stupid.

Your opinion is that anybody that opposes domestic abuse should open their home to battered women or financially support them. What ridiculousness.

So anybody that doesn't do that, can't oppose domestic violence?

I mean, in what world is this logical?

Same with abortion. Being opposed to it doesn't make them responsible. Sorry. Rational people dont make that connection, because it's illogical.

 

I will thanks.

 

Why not? Are you going to support that unwanted child you forced the mother to have?

 

Is there any wrong with supporting victims of domestic violence? This is a societal problem ergo we as members of that society should action it

I cannot believe how many think that Republican is the equivalent of " I have no responsibility to the society I live in"

 

Ah!! So not available to all??

 

And I can't believe how many liberals believe everybody with money has an obligation to support said society however progressives seem fit.

 

Yeah ... that pregnant one is rough for me too. Ima sit that one out

 

I preach that everyone, even pregnant women have a right to their own bodies.

Having sex does not, and should not, take away your right to your own body....and it's silly to think it should....

 

.




No, you didn't reply to me with the stats showing that some states allow elective abortion up to nine months because they do NOT.

BTW , you admit you had no stats at the end of this post LOL!

No,it is NOT "well known"...it is...…... gestation did not "speed up" ..it's the same as it's always been and a fetus is considered viable at 23 weeks.
Viable means able to live without extraordinary means. If a preemie needs special breathing, feeding apparatus it is NOT viable.

The only late term abortions are to save the life and/or health of the woman...…..why are righties always so against that ?