Questions for Mueller

Why does the denial of Trump's crimes always rely on unsubstantiated claims of bias?

 

Can't wait to hear the republican questions. Mueller has a lot to answer for.

 

Wrong!

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...even-say-that-trump-committed-a-crime.556548/

In civics class I learned that he isn't supposed to be. In the Trump administration I learned that he is.

Clueless comment. Read link above.

What Democrats give a crap about the idiot who handed Donald Trump the presidency?

 

No need, it's in his report. But............Trumper's refuse to accept it and those who are persuaded by propaganda need to hear the truth spoken by Mueller so it can't be lied about by Billy the Bagman, Individual 1, and Faux.

 

You accuse me of lying? Here is my post. Get informed before making idiotic accusations.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...imes-100-proven-in-the-mueller-report.556547/

 

I'm not accusing you of anything beyond putting words in Mueller's mouth. Mueller's report makes no allegations against Trump. You independently concluded Mueller proved 4 of 10 obstruction allegations that Mueller investigated. Now we're about to find out if Mueller has the same level of confidence that you've repeatedly claimed his report indicates he has. After Bob's testified we'll have a difinitive answer on "idiotic accusations".

 

Right, Presidents aren't above the law. He had a duty to report any laws they found were violated by anyone they were investigating.

And were that true then why didn't he early correct all the hysteria and proclamations by the MSM, by the Democtrats that he WOULD be bring criminal charges? He could have released a statement on day one that his office would be bringing no charges against the President even if crimes were found. Why would he let that false narrative even begin let alone grow into a political furor for two years? Did he tell Rosenstein when he was interviewing for the job that it was his belief that even if he discovered the President had committed murder he not only would not be able to charge him or even say the wanted to charge him?

Then stop claiming so now.

See previous post, Starr brought criminal charges to the Congress.

And BTW they charged no one else with a crime either.

They are the ones who keep giving him a stage.

 

The Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General and the DOJ Office of Legal Counsel totally debunked your claims.

 

I'm not sure how that's bias. Is what I said false? Speaking of denial, it's time for you to accept the results of the Mueller report this many months later...dontcha think?

 

Your implications are false.

 

You are accusing me of putting words in Mueller's mouth. If I had done that, that would be lying. I'm quoting page numbers from the report. Each and every one of the quotes are from the report.

Allegations against Trump are quoted in the post. And they are very serious. They are crimes. Mueller provides the evidence, the crimes, statuetes, act, nexus, motive... Everything short of saying that Trump committed a crime, because DoJ policies combined with court precedent prevent him from doing so.

I don't know why you accuse me of lying. Do you believe that will make Trump's crimes go away?

So first you accuse me of lying about what Mueller said, hoping that will exonerate Trump. And now you accuse Mueller of "idiotic accusations".

Make up your mind! Having a fallback excuse for the guy to be used when the first one fails, does not add any credibility whatsoever to your argument. Just face the facts: the guy's a criminal. An un-indicted criminal, if you want, but a criminal nonetheless.

Mueller is going to testify exactly what is on the report. I doubt he's going to add anything to it. Why would he? everything is there. Democrats just want to put him on record for people who won't read the report to hear.

 

He did!

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...imes-100-proven-in-the-mueller-report.556547/!

Because there was no such thing. Only in your fantasy world.

And, in any case, the Special Prosecutor doesn't report to the media. He reports to the Department of Justice. He's just an employee.

It is rare to see posts so clueless as yours.

This is the post you need to read

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-trump-onion-unpeeled.557797/#post-1070705696

 

What a useful way to spend our money.

 

Mueller proved that Barr lied.

 

mr. mueller, you appear to be 84 but google says 74, is this true?

 

you can get a free copy at hillsdale college, but (sarcasm) its being promoted by a racist, rush Limbaugh. (end sarcasm)

ACLU gives them away for free, and printable pdf copies are online at https://www.printableconstitution.com/

 

Ahh no and the DAG Rosenstein and DOJ Office of Legal Counsel agreed. Who do you have to refute them?

 

Who did he report violated the law in his report?

 

Ok. Since there is no disputing that Barr lied, we can look at any others you want. Quote what it is you want me to look at.

 

Trump!

And 34 others (at least) who were indicted.... but, most importantly, Trump. Read the links!!!

 

Better fwd those links to democrats in the House. Another impeachment vote failed miserably just 2 days ago.

 

There is a lot of evidence in the report of obstruction of justice which is a crime. Mueller reported the facts and left it to the Congress to take action because they are the only ones who can do so.

 

Because there is no factual Defense. The only way the Trump supporters would not claim bias is if everyone on Mueller’s team was Republican. Not enough for them that Mueller is a lifelong Republican.

 

Don't worry about the House. Worry about you not knowing the facts Get informed! Don't believe lies just because you hear Trump repeating them over and over.