Racism in the Press

why are you still trying to make your absurd argument I have caught you in a blatant unadulterated lie you have no creditability

I have exposed you when you claimed this steaming pile of crap
"North Carolina law requires a person to always have government issued photo identification on them"
as an excuse why the NAACP required those protesters to have an ID
But guess what slick you ridicules premise the foundation of your argument is nothing but a lie
NC doesn't have a public ID law you are not require in NC to have an ID on your person

take a look at the states that require you to ID your self by police when asked

Obligation to identify
Alabama Ala. Code §15-5-30
Arizona Ari. Rev. Stat. Tit. 13, §2412 (enacted 2005)
Arkansas Ark. Code Ann. §5-71-213(a)(1) (loitering)
Colorado Colo. Rev. Stat. §16-3-103(1)
Delaware Del. Code Ann., Tit. 11, §§1902, 1321(6)
Florida Fla. Stat. §901.151 (Stop and Frisk Law); §856.021(2) (loitering and prowling)
Georgia Ga. Code Ann. §16-11-36(b) (loitering)
Illinois Ill. Comp. Stat., ch. 725, §5/107-14
Indiana Indiana Code §34-28-5-3.5
Kansas Kan. Stat. Ann. §22-2402(1)
Louisiana La. Code Crim. Proc. Ann., Art. 215.1(A); La. Rev. Stat. 14:108(B)(1)(c)
Missouri Mo. Rev. Stat. §84.710(2)
Montana Mont. Code Ann. §46-5-401
Nebraska Neb. Rev. Stat. §29-829
Nevada Nev. Rev. Stat. §171.123
New Hampshire N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §594:2, §644:6
New Mexico N.M. Stat. Ann. §30-22-3
New York N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law §140.50
North Dakota N.D. Cent. Code §29-29-21 (PDF)
Ohio Ohio Rev. Code §2921.29 (enacted 2006)
Rhode Island R.I. Gen. Laws §12-7-1
Utah Utah Code Ann. §77-7-15
Vermont Vt. Stat. Ann., Tit. 24, §1983
Wisconsin Wis. Stat. §968.24

do you see what is missing? NC
so best you take your lies elsewhere no one is believing your BS you have been exposed

 

I can't figure out how that is true when everytime someone black commits a crime against someone white it is posted on this forum. If it is not reported in the press where are you guys getting the news from?

 

local. Only time a crime that is reported in the national press when it is white on black tell me the last time a black on white crime was ever reported in the national press. Only one I can think of was OJ Simpson and only reason that was because OJ was a football star and how many years ago was that? do you think the Dunn trial would be in the national press if a black man shot up a car?

 

Then my source was incorrect and I would actually commend North Carolina as I don't believe a person should be required to carry identification of any kind.

So if a person is not required to have a state ID in North Carolina then why do they want to require an ID for a person to vote considering that there are virtually no cases of voter identification fraud being committed in North Carolina? I have provided the source that voter fraud of all kinds is virtually non-existant in North Carolina already.

Could it possibly be that Republicans know that African-Americans in North Carolina are far less likely to have identification issued by the State because the State doesn't require a person to carry identification? Gee, go figure. Republicans target African-Americans that are more likely to not meet the eligibility to vote ID requirements because African-Americans vote for Democrats.

Seriously, we all know that the voting laws being passed by Republicans are nothing but Jim Crow voting laws that target minorities. Why do Republicans keep denying something that is so blatantly obvious to everyone?

 

Just Stop
no your source wasn't incorrect because your source never said it
I Just Caught You In Another LIE
you personally made that crap up about NC requiring you to have a ID while in public and now you want to LIE and blame it on a source which your source never said it
You Are a Chronic Habitual LIAR just like all liberals from your president on down

 

I believe they are biased and money hungry , I believe there are there are grave consequences associated with constantly telling blacks that they need lower standards and special concessions to succeed.
Further insulting blacks is the black civil rights coalition's argument that requiring a photo ID to vote will disenfranchise black voters. In essence, they are saying that blacks are too stupid to find their way to acquire a photo ID.


http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/07/naacp_furthers_mission_of_kkk.html

I agree with Lloyd Marcus, I also think by having to many special programs we fuel the hatred .

 

Sounds like made up BS to me. Any evidence of this law?

 

Lets see this source. Show us you arent just making the (*)(*)(*)(*) up as you go along.

 

On this form, but many are never making the national news as White on Black attacks do. You have two solid sources I gave you that prove that.

Well it's hard to keep it out of the city it comes from. Like the one in Tenn, it seems it never got out of the local press.

 

FBI.gov has a page showing interracial crime statistics. Google it its not hard to find.

 

The biggest reason it isn't huge in the press is because when its black on white the black person is arrested, tried and convicted. Now when its white on black is usually just the opposite and when black folks speak out that is when it becomes national news. What happened to the murderers in the Tenn case? Case closed.

 

Why is it the news industry is blocking Black crime from the public?

 

The above expresses abject idiocy.

Do you think that racism is limited to the behavior/acts of people such as Bull Connor?!

 

Closed case yes. But those were horrendous torture and murders. Not just your average murders. What was done to them was unbelievable and not a word from hardly any media outside of Tenn. I remember when that White guy in Texas tied up that poor Black guy and dragged him behind his pickup till he killed him and even tore part of his limbs off doing it. It was splattered all over national and international news as it should have been. But they covered this up and it looks like what the editor of the Chicago paper said, they cover up a lot of Black crime. Why?

 

Exactly.

 

Do you think the cops are seriously going to harass anyone participating in these types of events? No one believes that crap in 2014. If there are cops present, it will be to protect these folks; provide a safe route for them on public streets; keep any would-be antagonizers away from them...

 

not quite
there is no white jesse jackson or al not-so-sharptons so when its black on white it isnt dragged out for months due to public outcry and media coverage. in a murder trial you need an impartial jury of people who arent subject to the media barrage dragged out by race baiters like jesse and fat al which they are determined to make impossible. i guess when its black on white, whites would rather just have a speedy trial and conviction.

 

That depends on a few factors, but it is surely not unheard of.

No one believes what?

You're kind of naive, if you think it is as clear-cut as that. (I agree that most policemen do a great job.)

There is good reason given America's history, for activists to be prudent at every level.

 

No one believes cops in any city in America in 2014 will harass people at a civil rights demonstration. Yes, it's unheard of. The organizers are making up a false enemy of the people who will be there to protect them. It's silly. It's dishonest. They don't need to be prudent. They need to obey the law, just like everyone else.

Whatever America's history is, it's not America's present. In present day America, some cops do racists things when no one is looking. There are no organized racist activities on the part of police departments attempting to thwart civil rights demonstrations anywhere. That's ridiculous. You name one and I guarantee you the justice department would send the armada. That's any president's justice department.

 

You obviously don't know what you're talking about overall.

Never mind.

 

The next logical thing for you to do to prove me an idiot is to come up with one lousy example, in a nation of 300 million people and thousands of police and sheriff's departments, of an agency harassing people at a black civil rights demonstration. If you can find one bona fide example, I'll at least concede that I over exaggerated.

 

Surely this will be merged with the other threads posted a week or two ago on this very thing, but in the meantime...
what about the (2) photo IDs required to attend the Eric Holder speech about "Voter ID Discrimination" ?

Were they worried Holder would harass them?

If so, I don't blame them.

 

Such anger.

Anyway, it would be nice if racism didn't exist. Unfortunately, it does.

 

it exists everywhere in every race and it exists in the naacp and no amount of their counter racism and "two wrongs make a right" bs will fix it ever.

 

The $1.44 Billion in local expenditures on illegals is NOT fully funded by the illegals, and they re NOT paying their fair share, as demonstrated and stated in the Strayhorn Report you are failing to comprehend.

This is utter non-sense. Every economist out there will tell you, for legal skilled immigrants this may be the case, but for illegals they cost more then they are worth.