Should white supremacists have guns?

Do tell, is there a domestic terrorist registry? Do they have membership roles? Or is that based on who they think might be.

Of course there are idiots and twits, but without due process, you cannot validate who is a threat, and who is just a twit.

 

Self harm.... do you think we should do away with razor blades, bridges over water or pavement, drugs and other assorted methods of 'self harm'? Oh, add vehicles to that list.

 

Absolutely. And while we're at it, let's make it unlawful to gather in groups (of hatred, etc), and own a butter knife, and use social media. Once that's done, let's turn it around and use those laws against ourselves. Everyone wins!

 

1) Many drugs are already forbidden.

2) Only motorcycles.

 

ok, so because certain drugs are 'forbidden', do you think that will stop someone who wishes to exit life? How about an OD on insulin, that's legal.

Only motorcycles? I hope that was your attempt at humor.

 

You mean like in the movie "Minority Report"?

 

1) Dangerous drugs must stay forbidden. Should Fentanyl be legalized?

2) Motorcycles have lethality rate 29 times as high as cars.

 

Legal or not, people find a way to get it, no?
Cars are just as effective if one was looking to make an exit.

You never did answer the question about razor blades and bridges.

 

As long as your the one who gets to decide who the terrorists are?

Antifa and Black Lives Matter both incite violence.

How close to terrorism is bullying your political rivals? Maxine waters did that.

Someone who doesn't want to be in the same town or restaurant as their political rivals. And believes that telling them that "they aren't welcome here" how close to terrorism is that? Again Maxine Waters.

With such threats to the 2nd ammendment being promised I'd say the Democrats stand agsinst the constitution makes them very close to a terrorist organization.

 

Razor blades and bridges and almost all over the counter and prescription drugs are needed.

Fentanyl, like guns bring much much more harm then good.

 

Sadly for many Americans, the loss of 30,000 to 40,000 people per year is very unimportant. That is sad.

 

So some items that people use to commit suicide are OK, but others aren't, according to you. Do you see a flaw in your thinking?

 

Some items are much much more harmful. For instance, Fentanyl and guns. They are only used for harm.

 

Perhaps only LE and the Military should be armed.

 

Then take away cars, all drugs, sharp objects if you truly care.

 

That is reductio ad absurdum argument. Fentanyl is banned globally. Guns are banned in most Nations.

 

I don't give a rats patootie about fentanyl.

Guns also defend. But that's not exactly convenient for your theory, is it.

 

Which person has the right to tell another person that they may not be armed?

 

For every justifiable homicide, guns are used in 30 criminal homicides and 50 suicides.

 

Governments of most Nations on Earth do.

 

And you have the right to tell your neighbor that they may not have a firearm? Why are you the boss of your neighbor?

 

No, you stated things that hurt people, and brought in those who chose suicide in your anti-gun posts. The US is not 'most nations', and those other nations do not have our constitution. If you want to start dismantling the Constitution, how long until rights you hold dear become so much chaff in the wind? Or do you even understand why we have a Constitution and the Amendments?

 

And how do those people have this special right that you and I don't have?

 

Not me, but most Nations' governments do prohibit firearms.

 

So there are special people with rights that you and I don't have?