yes, im curious. Ill ask directly given your propensity for deflection. What do you think of Soros? this isnt about Madsen, this is about SOROS.
Unlike Gerorge Soros, I haven't heard any scuttlebutt that Alex Soros has collaborated with the Nazis, just globalist, international socialist, anarchist, Marxist and Maoist who hide behind the progressive label.
Anyone else notice this new trend in media, "some have called him X", "others have called you X". By attributing the slander to nameless others the media thinks to avoid slander or libel charges themselves.
You should've learned by now that calling people names and labeling them isn't working any longer. People have access to their own information and are free to make up their own minds. If your disgustingly overused MSM method to kill people's characters or eliminate political opponent worked, Donald J Trump wouldn't have become the U.S president. And yet it appears that neither the media nor you learned anything from that experience.
So what else would you call people like Madsen; well-informed and rational? And what about those who quote him as a reliable source, without bothering to check him out? Maybe I should start using David Icke and his in-depth knowledge of the Lizard People.
I think I might actually have met the younger Soros running a phone bank in Harrisburg, PA during Obama's first run for the presidency. He was sick as a dog with a miserable cold but was determined to persevere. He seemed like an OK person.
As I mentioned in another thread, if he were convicted of conspiracy against our government he could be fined. Substantially.
I don't think it's an accident that Turkey is now attacking and condemning the Netherlands because the country will not allow Turkish politicians to tour the country on a campaign trip.
I find it funny but not in a humorous way that people yap about how Soros "interfered" with the internal politics of certain countries but have no proof of this alleged interference. The sickest ones are the Rusians and pro Russian gaboomkas who accuse Soros of interference and Russia is the first European country since Germany to invade a neighboring country.
Soros seems to be behind much of the violence in this century, the US not excluded. If you think a wage earner like myself can personally dredge up absolute proof against a half-trillionaire, you are seriously delusional. To ignore the results of years of research some Soros watchers have developed is simple blindness.
hungary is auditing his NGOs. Its well known he funnels MASSIVE amounts of mula to groups aligned with the far left. You could ignore all that and stick to what you think, though. Ignorance is bliss.
Bullshit, it was independent of Russia since February Revolution in 1917. UrkSSR and RSFSR both been parts of Soviet Union, and both had autonomy before Union's dissolution. That sentence - is a twist of historic facts. An act of verbal pervercy.
Yes; his interview is part of Zakaria's program, per the above-mentioned link...nice find I'll put it here for any relevance it may have otherwise to current objectives of the Soros network in the US: "ZAKARIA: George Soros has made one of world's great fortunes betting on global trends, and he is deeply troubled by events and political trends in Ukraine, specifically, but Europe more broadly. He's just back from the region and he joins me to talk about what he saw, what he thinks and where he's putting his money. George Soros, pleasure to have you on. GEORGE SOROS, AUTHOR, "THE TRAGEDY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION": Same here. ZAKARIA: First on Ukraine, one of the things that many people recognized about you was that you during the revolutions of 1989 funded a lot of dissident activities, civil society groups in eastern Europe and Poland, the Czech Republic. Are you doing similar things in Ukraine? SOROS: Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia. And the foundation has been functioning ever since and played an important part in events now. ZAKARIA: Do you think Ukraine will be able to assert a kind of independence from Russia and an alignment with the West not -- but not a specific alignment as NATO but a kind of orientation toward the West or will the Russians always stop them? SOROS: No. Putin will try to destabilize Ukraine, but the Ukrainians, the large majority of Ukrainians are determined to be independent of Russia. It won't be easy because Putin has staked his regime on destabilizing Ukraine because it's a threat to his regime in Russia. If you have freedom, free media and so on and a flourishing economy, that would make his regime unsustainable. ZAKARIA: He accuses the Ukrainians of being anti-Semitic, of them being full of anti-Semitic fascists. You operate in Ukraine. You're of Jewish origin. Have you detected virulent anti Semitism in Ukraine? SOROS: Well, anti-Semitisms means collector of the DNA of that part of the world. So there is anti-Semitism. But there is much more in the east, in the Russian dominated part. That is this so-called independent republic. But there's actually atrocities against Jews and gypsies. ZAKARIA: You have been very pessimistic or gloomy about Europe. Do think that in this Ukraine situation you're seeing another aspect of the tragedy of Europe, the lack of collective action? SOROS: Unfortunately, Europe is very weak. It's preoccupied with the eternal problems which are unresolved. The euro crisis is no longer a financial crisis. It's turning into political crisis and you're going to see in the elections and Putin -- ZAKARIA: Explain what that means. It's going to be -- you're going to see it in the elections because you're going to see the rise of nationalist anti-European forces? SOROS: Yes, and interestingly, they are supported by Russia and pro- Russian. So Russia has emerged as an alternative to the European Union. Putin has sort of come out of the closet in Ukraine. With their ideology that is nationalist , be some ethic nationalism, you could call it Russism. ZAKARIA: That's right. SOROS: It's a new word to describe it because I don't want to call it Nazi because it is very similar to what you had in the end of warfare and fascism, you know -- ZAKARIA: Connecting your ethnic groups with military force if necessary? SOROS: But it's more than that. It's a new theology. You saw the myth of Russian superiority. If you -- those who watch Putin's speeches, he actually has revealed this new myth of Russian genetic superiority. You might have heard that previously from someone else. It's a new ideology based on ethnic Russian superiority. ZAKARIA: And as you saw a lot of these nationalists who are -- who are doing well in European -- the European-wide elections seemed very pro-Russian whether on the left on the right. Do you think nationalism could break up the European Union? SOROS: Yes, it's that and Europe needs to recognize it, and we need to recognize it, actually. We need to have bipartisan foreign policy. We used to have that, and we have lost it. So we need to reestablish it because there is a real threat. And so that is a threat to America also. Because what's happening in Ukraine and in Europe is having repercussions in Asia, you know, the Chinese -- that is establishing facts on the ground. (CROSSTALK) SOROS: Consequences and Putin just being in China and they have a common interest they are establishing one of -- which isn't actually anti U.S. ZAKARIA: Sobering words, George Soros. Thank you very much for coming on. SOROS: Pleasure. "
If these "Soros watchers" have years of research as you claim then publish this so called research as your proof. You say " Soris seems to be behind much of the violence in this century" so ok proove it. Show your proof because "seems" to be is not proof. If I said Trump seems to be a criminal you would demand proof. So I ask the same. Show proof that Soros is behind violence not an unsubstantiated accusation. Unsubstantiated accusations are just farts in the wind.
Well, that is quite a pile of bullshit. President Putin may be saying a lot of things, but 'genetic superiority of russians' is definitely not among them. So it seems this Soros operates with fairy tales, instead of facts.
It is true that that the RFSSR and the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Respublics were constituate republics of the USSR but people, news organizations, pokiticians, ignorant professors ( many of them I argued with in college) and so called historians have used the term Russia and The Soviet Union onterchangibly. How many have read and heard the 'Ignorancia" say stupid ignorant crap such as "the Russians captured Berlin" in 1945. It was the Soviet Rec army which was comprised of Russians, Georgians, Khazakhs, Armenians, Belarusins, and Ukrainians and many other ethnic people who served in the Rec Army. But ignorant fools used the terms interchangibly and if Soros did that, and I believe that he did then he is ignorant on thus issue. So Ukraine was not part of Russia but was incorporated into the USSR until 1991.
President's personal fetishes - is his private business. Point being - he never proclaimed any sort of genetic superiority of russians over any other nation.
I quoted one very detailed article earlier in this thread, and another poster just posted a direct quote from Soros. Maybe you could find something meeting your exacting requirements if you try to Google it for yourself.
