The USA is divided and there is no easy way out

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Battle3, Sep 20, 2018.

  1. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,014
    Trophy Points:
    113

    True, there are a lot of unknowns. What the end looks like is unknown. But you can only push people so far before they revolt. The question is how far is too far. In the past, the lefties worked incrementally and kept the incremental steps small enough and spaced far enough apart to stay well below that limit, even to the point of being under the radar entirely.

    But as the left advances, those steps become both larger and more personal so that people notice and start paying attention. That's where the USA is now. obamacare was the trigger for the USA that woke people up.
     
  2. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,014
    Trophy Points:
    113
    OK, I'll explain same sex marriage-

    I am solidly conservative. I believe homosexuality is a sin, and will not condone or encourage homosexuality, but I had no interest in banning it. If 2 men (or 2 women) want to live together, that's their business. Live and let live.

    I originally supported same sex marriage (until 2014) because the govt should treat people equally. Homosexuals claimed their concern was govt benefits (social security, disability, etc) and retirement programs and insurance for their partner, visitation at hospitals and end of life care, etc. That was reasonable, and a govt certificate (civil union) solves those problems.

    If a church voluntarily decides to perform same sex weddings, then that's their business.

    But then the gays changed their tune and started forcing their world view on people. If someone said homosexuality was a sin, the gays viciously attacked that person and his family, friends, employer/employees, customers. If a church did not want to perform a same sex wedding or recognize homosexuality or did not allow homosexuals to hold office, then the gays attacked it.

    And the gays started to phrase same sex weddings and homosexuality as a civil rights issue and wanted special protected status.

    Then it was clear the gays would not be satisfied with equality, they wanted enforced acceptance. They would not live and let live.

    So I oppose same sex marriage and special rights for gays.

    And many conservatives feel as I do.
     
    Bravo Duck likes this.
  3. Badaboom

    Badaboom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2018
    Messages:
    5,754
    Likes Received:
    3,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "Fatal mistake"... Over reacting much?
    The common ground is the survival of your society. The only one failing at compromising is you.
     
  4. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    51,877
    Likes Received:
    23,102
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They don't think they have to move incrementally or hide, and they may be right.
     
  5. Max Rockatansky

    Max Rockatansky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2013
    Messages:
    25,394
    Likes Received:
    8,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What about the 14th Amendment issues? It wouldn't be the first time authoritarians sought to shred the Constitution to push personal agenda issues.
     
  6. Max Rockatansky

    Max Rockatansky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2013
    Messages:
    25,394
    Likes Received:
    8,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You can't just like you can't compromise with those who think the other side are Islamic Marxist Socialists.
     
  7. DarkDaimon

    DarkDaimon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Messages:
    5,546
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So gays do not have 1st Amendment protection? The Westboro Baptist Church can hold up signs saying that God hates ****, other churches preach that gays are going to burn in hell and it's ok, but if the the gay community call out the bullshit, they can't? That sounds like a double standard to me. I do disagree with forcing churches to marry them (however this is the minority), though, I don't understand why any couple would want to get married by someone who thinks that they deserve eternal punishment for loving each other.

    As for these special rights and special protected status you mentioned, I'm not sure what those would be. What rights are the gays asking for that are not given to everyone else?
     
    Mr_Truth and Adfundum like this.
  8. Adfundum

    Adfundum Moderator Staff Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,743
    Likes Received:
    4,205
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Let me redirect you to the original comment. I said my assumption was that you "tend" to see things in terms of right or wrong. Based on your comments that followed, I still see that tendency.

    Notice my wording. I said I "almost never" see things as totally wrong. A woman kills her husband and is arrested for murder. Later, we learn she was protecting her daughter from being raped by the father. We see murder as wrong and this woman murdered her husband so we should lock her up?

    Wasn't necessary. I'm not arguing the differences, merely pointing out an example of a common source.

    You're speaking only in terms of the present or the very recent past. I spoke of it in the past tense--that there was once a considerable common ground. Even today, both sides agree with the idea of the Constitution, but not always on the interpretation of it. That means there is a common ground on many issues. Also, when limiting comments to only two sides, then speak in terms of stereotypes, suggesting all people on one side think this way and all people on the other side think that way, it does indeed suggest binary thinking.

    Sorry, but words are merely noises we make in an attempt to express thoughts. There is little that is absolute about words. Social Engineering and propaganda are proof of how language can be used to create realities in people's minds. The word, "reality" is a clear example of that. Does God exist? To some, it's an unquestionable reality. To others, it's not. At best, we can say that words reflect our individual reality.

    But when we say "no progressives are willing . . .", we're wrong unless we have proof of that 100% statement. Once again, I see a no-middle-ground-all-or-nothing kind of thinking in that wording.

    Original intent in what? The Constitution? Then we do have that shared common ground in the Constitution. We just don't agree on interpreting it.

    Unless we can prove the claim that all "progs want judicial activist judges. . .", the statement is false. Once again, such wording suggests a very polar way of seeing the world. That may be your reality, but it's not mine. (The phrasing, "progs want..." assumes all progs, not some progs. That's how language works.)

    The fact that we're discussing the Constitution, and how the two sides mentioned want to interpret the same document in different ways does show disagreement, but my point is that this all comes from a common source. We are different limbs on the same tree, not different trees.
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2018
  9. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,014
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong. "progressives" believe society will fail only if the society rejects "progressivism". Conservatives believes all society's which operate under "progressivism" fail.

    There is no common ground.

    You clearly are not living in the USA. Your ignorance of the situation is extreme.
     
    Bravo Duck likes this.
  10. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,014
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Historically the moved incrementally and quietly, but as I mentioned that time is past. All the small steps have been taken, there is no hiding their revolution any longer. obamacare was a big overt step but to the "progressives" it was worth it not just as a power grab but I think many of them thought it would benefit people and would win support....It also meant there was no hiding their revolution any longer.

    They cannot move quietly now. They are close to winning, but that final step is almost always violent and resisted.
     
    Lil Mike likes this.
  11. Moonglow

    Moonglow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Messages:
    20,754
    Likes Received:
    8,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I will tell you this, they better come to me cause I ain't chasin' them..
     
    Seth Bullock likes this.
  12. Moonglow

    Moonglow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Messages:
    20,754
    Likes Received:
    8,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    End the drug war let's all smoke a doobie and get along..
     
  13. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,014
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Read what I wrote.

    You have it completely wrong.

    I wrote "I originally supported same sex marriage (until 2014) because the govt should treat people equally..... If 2 men (or 2 women) want to live together, that's their business. Live and let live".

    I changed my position as soon as I saw that the gay mob was vicously attacking people who thought contrary to the gay agenda, even people who did not act against the gay agenda but held personal views the gays did not like. In other words, when the gays worked to deny people 1st amendment freedoms (free speech being one), and it was clear same sex marriage was a front, I opposed same sex marriage.

    Is that clear enough or do I need to write it a 3rd time?
     
  14. Badaboom

    Badaboom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2018
    Messages:
    5,754
    Likes Received:
    3,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're Not even making sense now.
     
  15. Junkieturtle

    Junkieturtle Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    16,063
    Likes Received:
    7,593
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Social media exaggerates the divide. The 24 hours news channels do too.

    Sure, there are people who vehemently disagree, but they've always existed. They were just much more disconnected from each other because they didn't have instantaneous widespread communication like the internet provides.

    People are really at war with the caricatures created to represent us all. They are, more often than not, people we know little about other than what the internet story just told us. Which makes it much easier to judge them.
     
    Meta777 likes this.
  16. yguy

    yguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    18,423
    Likes Received:
    886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The Russians got along well enough to fight off the Wehrmacht in WW2, but not well enough to fight off their worst enemy. So I'd say "getting along" isn't much of an aspiration.
    Damn good thing the Founders didn't listen to people like you.
    Would you say Russian society survived the Bolshevik Revolution?
     
  17. Seth Bullock

    Seth Bullock Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2015
    Messages:
    13,707
    Likes Received:
    11,990
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Ok, then we can stick our tongues out at each other, but a civil war is out of the question.

    Too fat, too spoiled.

    Ha! I guess that’s the up side to fat and spoiled.
     
  18. Badaboom

    Badaboom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2018
    Messages:
    5,754
    Likes Received:
    3,162
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean the founders didn't make any compromised?
    What does the bolchevik have to do with the democrat/republican divide in present day USA?
    Are you so out there that you believe half of your population are bolcheviks? If you're then I'd be more incline to put the blame on mental health issue affecting the republican than any perceived bolchevik ressugence...
     
  19. yguy

    yguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    18,423
    Likes Received:
    886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You're kidding yourself.
    So those who are too fat and spoiled will get slaughtered or starve, and the outcome will be decided by whoever is left. Enjoy.
    No, I mean they didn't compromise with those who wanted to enslave them - which, not coincidentally, is what leftists like Hillary want to do to decent Americans. You're welcome.
    You wanna find out, answer the damn question.
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2018
  20. DarkDaimon

    DarkDaimon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Messages:
    5,546
    Likes Received:
    1,568
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We are definitely having a communication problem.

    I understand that you originally supported same sex marriage but now feel there is some kind of gay agenda which now makes you opposed to same sex marriage. The thing is, there is no gay agenda, except to be treated like everyone else. Also, I've never seen the gay mobs attacking people (at least not physically), but I'm guessing that's not what you are talking about. It's funny that you talk about gays trying to deny people their 1st Amendment freedoms, but totally ignoring theirs. This is how freedom of speech works, the government cannot stop you from saying whatever you want (except in cases of slander or terrorist threats) but it does not protect you from other people using their freedom of speech to disagree with you or call you out for it. So if you say some homophobic remark, someone has the total right to call you out on it, of course, you have every right to defend yourself. This is called public discourse and is the foundation of democracy.

    Now I'll admit that I might be misunderstanding what you mean by agenda. If I am, please let me know what the gay agenda is.
     
    Mr_Truth likes this.
  21. Phyxius

    Phyxius Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2015
    Messages:
    15,965
    Likes Received:
    21,593
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You've been huffing gun oil and binge-watching Red Dawn and Jericho reruns again, haven't you? :roll:
     
  22. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Or with fence sitters who constantly complain about others but never do anything constructive themselves
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2018
  23. cerberus

    cerberus Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2015
    Messages:
    25,530
    Likes Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I seriously doubt that Putin gives a **** about the US or any other western country. In fact he's probably flattered (or amused?) by how much the west gives a **** about his.
     
  24. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    16,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Willya STAWP with this? We can't even get people to bloody VOTE in this country, (though I think that era may be over) Do you really think we're going to the barricades over fracking Health Care??

    The worst part is that this is the kind of TRULY irresponsible **** that gets some Redford J Necker to think that the Revolution is Here so he stops cleaning his collection long enough to go out and slaughter a sorority (godless Jezebels all of 'em with the tight pants but I am the Lord's Righteous Arm)
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2018
  25. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    57,653
    Likes Received:
    17,188
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hence the "if anyone" at the beginning. I don't thing he gave a damn who one the last election as long as they were damaged sufficiently so as not to be a threat to him and his. Putin is a Russian nationalist pure and simple. He doesn't give any more of a crap about world socialism than Peter the Great whom he seems in many ways to have patterned at least his PR campaign after.
     

Share This Page