Trayvon Martin: DOJ Set to Announce No Charges Against George Zimmerman

Man, you sure got that right! No cure for stupidity and unfortunately, sometimes a person pays a deadly price for their stupidity.....and that's why parents have to talk to their teens about 'being smart, think b/f you act' and etc.... so much stupid stuff was going on that night by both of them.......

The sunshine is calling me, so going to walk over to the store and get stuff for my organic veggie stew, which is so good even my 14 yr old granddaughter loves it.....now that impressed me! lol........

 

Ok Perry Mason. I guess you know more than the folks who have been doing it for years.

I just proved how the Law works for some and not for others.

So I guess that means you know more than the two LEO I quoted. I never claimed to be a (*)(*)(*)(*)house lawyer that is your title.

That's just it, it should have been gone over with a fine tooth comb at the murder scene.

Yea we know they never had the evidence because most of it was left at the crime scene.

 

'Ok Perry Mason. I guess you know more than the folks who have been doing it for years.'.

 

Dispatchers do not have authority to tell someone to do or not do something. Talking to someone is not a crime, beating someone's head against concrete is.

Get over it.

 

Following with the intent to kill someone is a crime.

 

Are you for real? the man whined that Martin came to the car window, peered in and then ran away.
So what the hell is the point in calling the cops and expressing fear if you're going to pursue a guy AFTER being told the cops are on the way and you're told you don't have to pursue the guy?

Give me a break...Zimmerman caused this tragedy, and got away with manslaughter. Deal with it.

 

Zimmerman talking to someone does not involve firearms. An animal pouncing on him and smashing his head into concrete does involve firearms.

You are not allowed to attack people for talking to you.

Deal with it.

 

So using a firearm to defend your life as someone is beating your head against the ground is "following with the intent to kill"?

 

http://youtu.be/eGuctYqCDvo
======================================

http://www.theatlantic.com/national...-of-trayvon-martin-911-tapes-released/254660/

"These (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s always get away," he says to the operator. Zimmerman is then heard giving directions to the dispatcher.

"(*)(*)(*)(*), he's running," Zimmerman says.

"Are you following him?" the dispatchers asked. "Yes," Zimmerman responds.

"We don't need you to do that," the dispatcher says.

 

That's great. But when are you going to document the "intent to kill" assertion you made? Or is this another "because I said so" level argument the likes of which we see all too often around here?

 

That predictably fails to address the question.

 

I think GZ wanted to take out TM.

- - - Updated - - -

I think GZ wanted to takeout TM. You don't. Get over it. We disagree.

 

Reports coming in say that Eric Holder, Al Sharpton and Barack Obama are in deep depression because they were unable to lynch this "White Hispanic".

 

Yep and other reports are coming in that white racist all across America are going to have one big rally for the "white Hispanic" getting away with killing an unarmed black teenager.

 

Justice was done. That should be celebrated.

 

A jury of his peers found him not guilty. In fact the prosecutors have been taken to task for trying Zimmerman. No, no, no, you've got that wrong, only Ku Klux Klan Democrat Progressives have rallies in front of the White House and march down Pennsylvania Ave.

​

 

Only I didn't state whether I thought he did or not. Reading comprehension not your forte?

I merely challenged you to back up your assertion. Needless to say, you failed to do so.

 

I gave you my reasoning as to why I think he intended to kill TM. You didn't like my answer. Not my problem. Move on.

 

Three years and no rally... Perhaps you are one of the few that are obsessed with the races involved.... You left out the assault.. Again.

 

All they have is the 'liberal narrative' aka the democratic party line...aka a movie playing in their head.

 

Only a coward believes that, because I don't know any real men that would need a gun for a 160lb teenager.

- - - Updated - - -

We have seen the rally right on this forum. Oh you mean the self-defense, damn I keep forgetting if it is a black male its assault.

 

Strawman.. I never claimed "if it is a black male its assault".

Martin was one person. He assaulted someone. That person defended themselves. Simple. There is no reason to bring race into it. There is no reason to insult posters on this forum and there sure as hell isnt a reason to post crap like "damn I keep forgetting if it is a black male its assault."

It is nice to see yet again instead of focusing on the topic you feel the need to attack members and the forum itself.. If you feel that strongly stop posting. I am willing to bet most will not miss you.

 

And you are depressed because the black thug didn't manage to kill the white guy, we get it.

- - - Updated - - -

Then why did he call the police and give them his name and his location and then wait until they were almost there before the shot was fired? Why didn't he just shot him when he first saw them and what is your alleged motivation for him to kill Martin?

 

Don't know, don't care. IMO, he and OJ got away with murder. Oh well <shrugs>

 

You have yet to post how any of that would have changed a thing. Again we KNOW Zimmerman shot Martin and Martin ended up dead.

No you proved your ignorance of it.

No the ones that handled the trial no more about the evidence and still waiting for you to explain how any of that would have changed the outcome of the trial.

What did they miss that would have changed the outcome of the trial? What evidence was lacking?

What evidence?