Trump had another meeting with Putin - alone

You mean fake news snopes? Might as well throw them in with CNN and MSNBC....ALL FAKE.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Why would Obama release 5 TALIBAN commanders and skids of cash for one worthless deserter traitor unless they were COLLUDING together? Beyond that did you even look at those videos? You can hear, you aren't deaf correct?

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/06/world/la-fg-afghanistan-chopper-20110807 <-----TALIBAN

https://www.circa.com/story/2017/04...covered-up-real-cause-of-deadly-chopper-crash <----TALIBAN

Obama changed the rules of engagement laws that caused the death of those men. The new rules stated no troops could fire until given the okay. I believe Obama had those 38 Navy Seals sent there specifically to die. <-----TALIBAN.

Below is an excerpt I pulled from that article just above: I marked it in brackets.

{{{ Monitoring the scene from above, she relayed the scene to the ground force commander. “You have two enemy forces that are still alive,” she said. “Permission to engage.”

They were denied.


Marquez told Circa the ground commander's decision to not allow her crew to engage the two enemy fighters sealed the fate of those involved in Extortion 17.


38 dead }}}


http://nypost.com/2014/06/08/how-the-taliban-got-their-hands-on-modern-us-missiles/ <-----TALIBAN
Ambassador Stevens, two navy seals, and one other were begging for more security before that fateful horrific night when they were brutally murdered in BENGHAZI.

Illegal immigration is down because of TRUMP not Obama. This is what Obama did about that:

http://rickwells.us/ice-agents-admit-obama-flooding-us-illegals/



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/4/obama-reinstates-catch-and-release-policy-illegals/

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/25/us/ice-immigrant-deportations-trump.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...mp-lifts-morale-that-was-at-all-time-low.html



Anything else you need numb nuts?

 

Do you think that was the proper venue and the proper way to discuss such things? LOL!!!!!!

 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/19/inside-the-ring-ransom-paid-for-bergdahl/

The pentagon CLAIMED that because for one Obama put egg on America's face by showing a complete lack of common sense and paying them, and two, it blew away the "We don't negotiate with terrorists" scenario. A good rule of thumb..if those in governments lips are moving, they're probably lying.

 

Was just pointing out it could have been anything other than colluding as the "salivating frothing at the mouth" left would try to make it. Hell I don't know, maybe they were talking about how they like to grab pu**sy.

 

Making up things does not make them true you know.

 

Where did I say sorry? Thr onky sorry thing here is hyperventilating by the left.

How come all during the Clinton years and Obama years all we heard about was dialog and diplomacy and if we just talk together we can solve all our problems but nkw dialog is verboten Presidents who speak with foriegn leaders are to be impeached and removed from office and tried for treason.

 

We'll, we know they weren't expressing their concerns for global warming. That much we know.

 

Not our money to negotiate with. By the way, what part of the Iran Deal was compromised? You know, like links proving the Iranians are not complying with the agreement?

 

But see that's the point. Thanks for pointing it out.... nobody knows what they discussed because standard protocol was ignored and violated. Normally the President's own translator would be present at least.

 

The more Trump sends the media into a tizzy over things like this, the more I like him. And I don't really like him. Now he has had a private conversation with the president of Russia w/o getting Mika and Chris Matthews' permission first? The horror!

Seriously, I do not understand the big deal. Presumably they can call each other on the phone any day, any time, and talk about whatever they want, without anyone's approval or knowledge.

Now tell me the absolute WORST consequence of his having this "private meeting." Will we be nuked tomorrow as a consequence? Did he give Putin a hot stock tip? Did he ask Putin to send some agents to poison Chuck Schumer?

What??

 

And? Was the translator going to leak the content to the NYT?

 

"ALONE!"... at a diner table with 50 other people. Lmfao you can't make this kinda pathetic leftwing bullshit up.

 

That's about as convincing a scenario as the golden shower. You people are evil who are spreading around this baseless speculation.

 

So what did they talk about at the "secret meeting," Tom444?

 

Gangsta stuff.

 

Irrelevant. What part of "improper" do you not understand?

 

Gee, duh, none of it. I never even heard the word before.

Why don't you tell us what you know to have been improper about it, and please measure the meeting against a universally accepted definition of "improper." ("Unconventional" is not the same thing.)

This is sort of a trick question, because I know that you don't have any idea what they really talked about, nor will you be explain how this convo compromised the USA.

 

In itself, it 'proves' nothing.
But of Course, if collusion has been going on (and it has, top-to-bottom).. they needed another meeting.. without Tillerson.
What to do!? All the investigations, Congressional sanctions.. how was Trump to fulfill his part of the Election quid pro quo going forward?
Sure enough!

​

`

 

No it hasn't.

See how easy it is to make baseless allegations on the internet?

 

What we know is this. Putin has his own interest in mind. So, Trumps job is to represent our interests. Has Trump ever done, or said, anything that would make you think he is interested in anything beyond his own nose?

 

It's really easy when you Dishonestly 'short-quote' someone, and the balance of his post with supporting information.
Another little Infowars/BreitbarK joker.
+

 

Baseless? If you receive a feeler from a hostile foreign power, and send a signal to that hostile foreign power you are willing to deal, without reporting that feeler to the FBI, you have left yourself open to blackmail. This happened.

 

1. Define "hostile".... It does not appear to be a legal term
2. What about "non-hostile", is opening yourself to blackmail by a neutral or even friendly power OK? If not, should everything be reported to the FBI?
3. What about a "feeler" from a hostile foreign power to which you respond "I'll be flexible"? Is it OK when Obama does it?

See how easy it is to spew absurd nonsense on the internet?

 

No, because yours is clearly nonsense.