Trump Will Fire Mueller

What facts? Facts that are part of a special counsel's investigation aren't available on the internet.

 

That is why I asked. I saw things said as were they facts. Thanks for dismissing those comments I spoke of.

 

Right. And while I agree with you that democrats or liberals on this board don't have the evidence, that's because no one does. Aside from Mueller and his team, no one really has access to the evidence that's being collected and what it points to just yet. Everything we know is based on speculation or others involved talking about the investigation.

That said, one can speculate that Mueller subpoenaed records to look for certain crimes. As in, Trump Org records to look for financial irregularities typically means they are looking for a short list of things that were done wrong. But we don't have access to those records.

The way I see it is Trump could end this whole thing by making it all public. Let everyone scrutinize the records Mueller is after. If there's no crimes in there, then what's the risk? It's all about past business stuff anyway and besides he's divested from his company as it is so his interests should be what's best for the nation, that is putting to bed a hobbling special investigation, not ensuring the profitability of his company. Right?

 

Trump could do that. Were I trump I would run this as a public service announcement.

 

Its been reported that McCabe has amassed a personsl fortune of $11 million while in the FBI

so maybe he does not care about the pension

Who knew washington swamp rats were corrupt as well as power hungry?

https://finapp.co.in/andrew-mccabe-net-worth/

 

Liberals do dream big, dont they?

I think he has nothing but wants to keep the witch hunt in the news till november when it will - he hpoes - bring lots of trump haters to the polls for a big democrat party win

 

My statement was an 'opinion' of mine posted in response to post # 97 by mac 7 that he stated was his 'opinion'. What's your problem with thatd?

 

^^^^

 

Doubtful, but if he does it will not only be "Must See TV" but be a great lead-in to the November election.

Why do you think the country is so divided, Lesh? Do you blame only one side or both?

 

We'll see as we approach the mid term. Expect a lot of Russian "leaks" and fake news.

Hang on. It's going to be a bumpy road

And last time when the Russians got into the voting database...as far as we know...they didn't change any votes or erase anyone's registrations. They've had two years to perfect their programs and they're bolder now.

 

That's the worst case scenario for everybody except Trump

 

What party elected Trump and defends him to the bitter end?

What party controls Congress?

 

The above in response to this

 

What? Liberals not interested in claiming the participation trophy is a victory? Nixons proceedings produced his resignation. Clintons didn't result in his removal or departure. I presumed political forum posters have some appreciation of "context" ... It's a mistake I keep repeating, but I'm larnin' ...

 

It also said no American was found to have conspired with the Russians. They also investigated Trump's meeting with the Russian lawyer and found no wrong doing. No wrong doing in anything concerning Russia, Trump and the election.

 

It took Ken Starr four years to impeach Clinton for a blowjob. What's your rush?

Scared bro?

 

While investigating whether the payoff to Stormy Daniels was a violation of campaign finance laws, Robert Mueller would be well within the boundaries if he asked Donald Trump if he had sexual relations with that woman, Miss Clifford.

 

Which are facts that only Capt. Obvious would waste 4 paragraphs, or one really long run on, pointing out on a political forum.

 

And liberals complained the whole time

But Starr had credible evidence against clinton from the getgo

Mueller does not have anything on trump

 

While investigating whether the payoff to Stormy Daniels was a violation of campaign finance laws, Robert Mueller would be well within the boundaries if he asked Donald Trump if he had sexual relations with that woman, Miss Clifford.

And you have no clue what Mueller does or does not have on Trump. You are just wishfully thinking. Because you are scared.

 

Nice try.

No donut.

You vividly said: "Nixon was impeached" and "Bill Clinton avoided impeachment along partisan lines."

Neither of which was close to being true. There is no "context" to this -- you were just outright WRONG.

 

The Rush is they already said no Americans were involved. They are no longer looking into whether Trump was involved with Russia to sway the election. They want to go through everything he did in his life time hoping to find something, anything to hang him with and we all know it.

 

Nixon was not impeached.

Clinton was.

<Mod Edit- Rule 4>

 

Your needle is stuck on stormy daniels

Unless she’s a russian that has nothing to do with alleged colludion by trump