Trump Will Fire Mueller

Just like Ken Starr didn't start out investigating a blowjob.

Scared, bro?

 

Are you willing to eat a fat pile of crow if another indictment is handed down that does include Americans? Because that's the qualifier in the sentence; and it was chosen carefully. You've already decided what you believe. All I'm saying is that he left the door wide open for more indictments. Acquaint yourself with the arc of denials.

 

Both were impeached, and Clinton was acquited by the split vote in the senate. Both are completely true. I see there is interest in claiming a participation trophy after all ... just not the one I thought.

 

He resigned to avoid being impeached

So its practically the same thing

 

Nope.

Man, you just keep coming back for more!

 

So,trump is on route to get rid of "anyone" that doesn't bow & kiss his a## & do his bidding, then there are those that trump has been forced to get rid of ,because of their lies or wife-beating or not being able to get security clearances or their ties to Russia--So what makes anyone think he doesn't have a plan to get rid of the person (Mueller) that actually has all the filthy dirt on him---OF "course" he will try to find a way to fire Mueller---won't stop the truth from coming out though---

 

Posted prior to the above post.

Oh looked...we've devolved into irrelevant minutia

 

A lot of indictments. Several guilty pleas. Trump's Chumps are getting nervous. Just like a mobster, Trump is attacking the prosecution, and his mobster groupies are rushing to his defense.

Mueller cannot ignore other crimes which are brought to his attention. That would be irresponsible, if not criminal.

 

But they were directed at Hillary, who was not only a Democrat but the AntiChrist. We're all minions of the Dark Lord but she's the Great Witch.

 

Trump and his Chumps denied he got a leg up by the Russians.

Now they can no longer deny it. Mueller has the smoking gun.

By acting like a guilty person, Trump brought all this down on himself.

 

And he triples down for all to see and laughs galore abound.

 

When this is all over & Mueller's report released---How many "volumes" to you think there will be?
Maybe enough to keep trump busy reading in his jail cell daily for 10 years?

 

The context in which you operate, PI, is not the one that conforms to what is happening in America.

 

It will be required reading with a quiz at the beginning of the day. If he wants more than bread and water, he must pass each quiz.

 

Trump doesn't read...maybe he'll develope a hobby

 

No, he is not....going... to fire Mueller. I'm really thinking you all want him to. You're like a bunch of hysterical, chickens running around. Comey and McCabe deserved to be fired. They both should be jailed for using their resources at the FBI for political purposes..

 

No more grins produced by your game of semantics than by the leftist delusions of impeachment, and constitutional crisis that I read daily on PF. Liberals have to take their victories wherever they imagine they find them, I suppose. Congradulations, you've been treated to 3 today. ::

 

I hope you're correct about the first part of your post. I have my doubts.

As for the second...that's just batcrap crazy

 

You live in alternate realityville.

It is a FACT Nixon was not impeached.

It is a FACT Clinton was impeached.

This is not "semantics." Own up.

WORDS
MEAN
THINGS.

 

FBI are sworn not to use their job for political purposes. Why do you think he was fired with no pension? You all keep trying to put our president in prison, but give these two ex-FBI goons a pass? They both colluded not to charge Hillary over her criminal use of the private server.

 

Because he pissed off the Great Orange Gasbag

Because he's a witness in the investigation of obstruction of justice and he's trying to attack his credibility

 

Translation: Blame game. It's all the fault of the Right. The Left has no fault at all.

Got it. Thanks for proving my point.

 

You're well aware that the House Judiciary Committee adopted Nixons articles of impeachment. As I noted, neither Nixons or Clintons impeachment "proceedings" resulted in any constitutional crisis. I also noted that impeachment provisions ensure no such crisis can occur. That's the context you've ignored. Now find your own meaning in these words, which are my last on this subject. But if you'd like to steer us back to the OP topic, I'll listen to your argument ... provided you have one.

 

IF TRUMP FIRES MUELLER, IT'S THE BEGINNING OF THE END, SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM WARNS

http://www.newsweek.com/if-trump-fires-mueller-its-beginning-end-senator-lindsey-graham-wanrs-850424


So come on Trump - you wimp - fire Mueller already.

The faster you do - the faster we can be rid of you as POTUS.

 

It DOESN'T matter. You stated with authority "Nixon was Impeached."

It is a process - the political equivalent of an indictment - that is voted on by the HoR that did not take place.

You said over and over and Nixon was impeached -- Just stop it for gawds sake.

And look there -- you did it again. What in the hack is wrong with you you can't admit Nixon was never impeached? A "proceeding" here would have meant a full vote took place. It didn't.

The only impeachment (indictment) on the table in modern history was Clinton's, and most of the country knew it was a bullshit and political ploy by the rat**** pubs about lying about a BJ -- that's why during the proceedings Clinton's approval rating soared. Had he been removed from office, which is the trial in the Senate (Part II of a two part process) with Senators voting as proscribed by the Constitution -- it surely would have produced a Constitutional Crisis.

Andrew Johnson's impeachment, the only other one in our history, did produce a CC. Though he wasn't removed, the charges (still political) had more meat to them.

You're the one who has trouble with word usage. Best you own up, and learn the correct meaning of words.