Trumps $100 Million Dollar Golf Bill

You seem to be unable to do anything but dodge and ignore relevant data or common sense. Almost like you have an agenda...

You stated I have a problem, what problem do you feel I have?

 

Factually incorrect.

In fact, Trump wouldnt have won without support from the same people who voted for Obama.

 

It would be a vast improvement to ... well ..... post fact

 

What did I ignore? What makes you think I dodge? What agenda?

 

Ya, try it sometime...

 

What have I posted that was incorrect?

A specific instance please, or ignore this like you have the last few questions that exploded your narrative.

 

A question to me is not proof

Still we both know that we believe his trust collects,. but he by law lost control of the trust.;

A way to see this as a reply is in this question back format.

Do we know the cost per mile to transport Trump by auto?

Do we believe presidents call off the Secret service during the day or evening?

What do you personally know about the Trump secured properties that you want us to know?

I did not manage presidential property in my career yet I handled the sale of two homes by a Fed property manager that did manage presidents property. He told me a lot about how it works. I also handled a purchase for his wife when he and she divorced.

Ah yes, even if a president says no to improvements the SS/Feds must still make said improvements.

i expect that at the Obama Chicago property owned by Obama the SS even provided security there and made other improvements in the name of security. It is normal is my message.

 

So far you have ignored two quested in post #78 that prove trump is fleecing the taxpayer, what problem you said I had in post #64, the reason of the increased costs in post #57, and two questing in post #54 that show why what trump is doing is much more egregious than Obama could have even dreamed of on this issue.

The above is why I know you dodge, you realize people can go back and see you doing this, correct?

Willful ignorance

 

You deserve it.
@cd8ed

 

We republicans know the difference in riding a horse vs riding a cow.

I am doing more than posting so at times I do not see other posters posts.

 

A question by itself is not, using that questing to apply common reasoning is however.

So then the answer to both questions is yes. He is profiting off of his golfing trips. Would you have been ok — not even just ok but defensive — had Obama done the same?

I am sure it is significant. Point?

No

I fully expect the SS to protect the president, the president should not financially benefit because of those protections however.

 

Proven in post #86, try again

 

I would love to examine the data posters presented. So you are calling me out over your claim I lack integrity. Question back. Why is it necessary for you to attack posters?

 

Ah yes, now claim ignorance. I’m glad y’all know what animal you are riding.

 

Why is it necessary for you to not have integrity? The world may never know...

 

I looked on google maps to see if the former estate of Richard Nixon still had the guard house and the helipad it had when Nixon was president. I am pleasd to report none of that is visible. I saw a fine overhead view too. It laid out the whole property. I expect the guard shack in Chicago and other trappings needed by president is also gone.

my point is I believe of all the posters, I have come so close to interfacing with a president property manager I learned a lot from him. I enjoy passing along how it works.

 

In my life, I have performed valuable services to my industry and spent time on two major boards of directors where I have been awarded professional certificates attesting to my integrity.

Have you any similar awards?

1. SACBOR awards
2. CAR awards (C means California)
Two institutions awarding to me.

 

You make claims. Do not worry about my claims.

 

If I were the President, I would recreate at fishing resorts and hunting lodges. Visiting heads of state could meet me in those places.

No need for a big Secret Service entourage because I can protect myself and my visiting guest.

Recreation and diplomacy on the cheap.

 

I am not clear that presidents can get away with that.

 

A casual and lowkey President that's relatively accessible to the people? Who would've thought. Seriously if Trump wins a second term, I think it'll be more swimming than the first, simply because Russian 'Collusion' is DEAD.

 

Why is some Aussie subject worried about the American Taxpayer? 100 million is chump change. .30 cents per taxpayer. I think we can afford that. In the mean time you just keep bowing to your queen and enjoying your status as a subject and the property of the State and those who are above you. Do not try to tell free and sovereign people what they should be worrying about, it is not your place.

 

Yeh because no person with an award has ever lacked integrity. You post history alone in this single thread is enough to demonstrate that. My personal certifications, academic or business related awards — which more than tripled yours before I even left college — are irrelevant and hearsay, just like yours.

 

If I were the president, I think it would be fun to get behind the wheel of pick-up truck and randomly stop in at small town cafe's or whatever. I'd let a couple of Secret Service guys trail me with the nuclear briefcase, but I'd leave the Vice President in charge of all the Washington, DC, crap and just visit with regular Americans.

I might just randomly and without warning stop in at a steel mill or auto assembly plant and shake some hands.

If the Prime Minister of whatever wanted to meet, I'd book a fishing resort in Montana under an alias and we could meet there.

Or stay in a guest house on a military base and use the base headquarters for our meeting. After, just go hang out with the troops.

The Secret Service would just have to get used to it and not get their panties in a wad.

 

You are talking like George W. Bush now. Democrats hated when he did that.

US President meets Australian PM at Texas ranch