Tump fires NSC member for criticizing him

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Ronstar, Feb 18, 2017.

  1. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,718
    Likes Received:
    25,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In fact, Clinton could not win any of the debates against either Sanders or Trump in spite of the debate "moderators" leaking the questions to her.
     
  2. Sadanie

    Sadanie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2011
    Messages:
    14,427
    Likes Received:
    639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ONE person leaked ONE question to Hillary prior to a debate WITH SANDERS.

    She won ALL the debates against Trump.

    Fake news again? As I said before, I don't like this person. . .but I do NOT like fake news either.
     
  3. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,718
    Likes Received:
    25,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nonsense. She was very weak in every debate. Of course, the hot house plants that come out of the elite universities think she won - they all sprouted from the same seed beds. WikiLeaks exposed the extensive collusion between the MSM, the DNC and the Clinton campaign. That is why all the "experts" assumed Clinton would win in a landslide. Even with all that help - she could not win.
     
  4. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,718
    Likes Received:
    25,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You think she won the debates because of your obvious bias. The extent of the collusion between the MSM/DNC/Clinton campaign was extensive. Have you even bothered to read he Podesta email published by WikiLeaks?

    Your criticism of Trump's speaking style reveals a typical elitist bias against the common American vernacular - how everyday Americans talk. No wonder Trump won.

    The MSM is Fake News. Surely you have noticed.
     
  5. Sadanie

    Sadanie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2011
    Messages:
    14,427
    Likes Received:
    639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not sure where you live, but where I lived in America for 45 years (Colorado, California, Pennsylvania and South Carolina) and where I visited extensively my family (Arizona, Montana, Oregon), people with a successful high school education didn't speak 4th grade gibberish. Elitist? Is that what you call a foreign born speaker who manages to learn to speak and write English better than your President? Is that why you support his pick for Secretary of Education?

    Wikileaks was a tool to manipulate the elections, and much of what they spread was propaganda provided to them by RUSSIA. Simple. . .why did Wikileaks choose not to reveal the trickery of the Russia/Trump campaign talks?
    Why did Comey choose to "reveal" a "new inquiry into Hillary's e-mails" 10 days prior to the elections, but NEVER bothered to "reveal" the inquiry into the Russia connection?

    Yes, Hillary won the debates against Trump. . .ALL of them. If you choose not to believe that. . .you should worry about YOUR fake news. . .not mine!
     
  6. therooster

    therooster Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2014
    Messages:
    13,004
    Likes Received:
    5,494
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No she didn't. Maybe to you I hate trumpets she won . But to patriotic Americans, Trump kicked it .
     
  7. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,718
    Likes Received:
    25,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "... people with a successful high school education didn't speak 4th grade gibberish. Elitist?" Yes, that is a very elitist dismissal of the way everyday Americans speak to each other.

    There is no mystery about the source of the leaked Emails. They came from a Sanders Democrat who had access to them. Hacking and Russians had nothing to do with it.

    “'Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,' (*)Murray said. 'The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.'

    He said the leakers were motivated by 'disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.’”

    “’I don't understand why the CIA would say the information came from Russian hackers when they must know that isn't true,' he said. 'Regardless of whether the Russians hacked into the DNC, the documents Wikileaks published did not come from that.’”

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...termediary-disgusted-Democratic-insiders.html
     
  8. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,718
    Likes Received:
    25,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump won the debates in spite of the collusion of the moderators and the MSM to help her win.
    She just couldn't do it.
     
  9. RPA1

    RPA1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    22,806
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Where is the law that says a bureaucrat is immune from being fired?
     
  10. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,718
    Likes Received:
    25,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I expect the 9th Circuit to conjure up such a law any day now. ;-)
     
  11. Sadanie

    Sadanie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2011
    Messages:
    14,427
    Likes Received:
    639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Still believe that Trump's brainwashed supporters are "patriotic," and maybe they are or at least they sincerely believe they are. But can you even imagine how "unpatriotic" they would have accused Obama of being if HE had brown nosed Putin and send "love letters" to Russia?

    I bet you would have called Obama a TRAITOR, and a COMMUNIST, and you would have had him investigated for treason!

    No, dear, you and the trumpets are NOT "patriotic Americans." Today, you are FOOLED patriotic americans, who are selling their country to Russia.
     
  12. Sadanie

    Sadanie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2011
    Messages:
    14,427
    Likes Received:
    639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are too funny in your alternate facts belief! That's okay. . .you are not the only one, it seems to be a trend these days, although Fox News appears to be getting tired of having to report fake news and to bow to the whims of the clown and his surrogates! Good for them!
     
  13. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,718
    Likes Received:
    25,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am not sure you know what Fake News is. Here is an example:

    “The investigation by officials began Friday, when the Vermont utility reported its alert to federal authorities, some of whom told The Washington Post that code associated with the Russian hackers had been discovered within the system of an unnamed Vermont utility.” Washington Post, Russian government hackers do not appear to have targeted Vermont utility, say people close to investigation, By Ellen Nakashima and Juliet Eilperin January 2, 2017.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...6f69a399dd5_story.html?utm_term=.9c190920811f
     
  14. Ddyad

    Ddyad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    53,718
    Likes Received:
    25,657
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We get it - you have been intellectually blinded by your hate for Trump.

    Obama did not run against Trump, Clinton did and the serious Left was far more likely to denounce Clinton as a traitor and a spy than Trump's supporters who, for the most part, just thought she was a typical corrupt establishment politician who deserved to lose the election.
     

Share This Page