Video: Black Teens Assault White Student on School Bus

Obviously to you it does, thankfully most people can see what the true intent is.

 

LoL, you're trembling because four black men were standing in front of a polling place with mean looks on their face, but it's ok for hundreds of armed "ranchers" to point their guns at government employees?

Yes, we do know who the "racist" are.

 

Who's trembling? But I appreciate your honesty in endorsing menacing from the BP's and racism from Holder.

- - - Updated - - -

To me it 'does' what?
It is a legitimate news story. Does white guilt afflict you often?

 

Blacks that cling to the 400 crap do so because you have race pimps like Al,Jesse and Tavis keeping the old flames fanned. Some people like a crutch.

More links from the forum? How about links from Al, Jesse or Tavis? Pimps that actually have an effect on the crutch carriers. You got any of that? No? Didn't think so.

 

I appreciate you clarifying your position on which is more menacing.

LoL, noted for when you get up in arms about the term "uncle tom".

- - - Updated - - -

This forum is a microcosm of society. Sometimes it helps to show proof where most of the hate and racism comes from. Al, Jesse, or Tavis don't hold a candle to some of the disgusting things that are said online.

 

Both of them are. And you condone it.

You didn't answer my question. How often does white guilt bother you? Unless you have another reason for getting upset when black on white crime is posted.

 

You're entitled to your erroneous opinion. For all you know, one poster could have 10 nics who plays for both sides of an argument. You can be anything online where no one can see you. But we know full well where your race pimps stand. And now we know you support them.

 

You like creating strawmen to help your argument, fine, your bias in seeing 4 black guys standing outside a polling place deserves a national guard response vs a hundred or more armed ranchers which does not invoke a response is telling.

Oh look, another strawman, is that why it takes so long for these responses?

Newsflash smartguy, if Al, Jesse, and Tavis are race-pimps, MLK Jr. and Malcom X would have been given that label by cons if they were still alive.....

 

No straw man here. Instead of condoning the actions of the BP's as well as Holder's racism, you either ignore them or mock me for pointing them out. And where did I say the ranchers did something legal? What they did was far from legal.But they didn't kill innocent people at Waco or Ruby Ridge.

I posted what X had to say about democrats. Unless you can show me otherwise, I can't find X race pimping like your buddies Al, Jesse and Tavis.

 

Conservatives are apparently so stupid that they believe no minorities come on this forum. I've always said that whatever few conservative minorities that are out there would quicky become liberals if they spent five minutes on this forum, or any other right wing website.

 

Did you just call Jesse Jackson a pimp? Hahahaha

 

Yep. Always has been.

 

What makes you say that?

 

Forty years of observation.

 

So it's your typical 'because I say so' nonsense. No surprises there

 

Let me help you with Mod edit,,flounder. Behold your local race pimp........................

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/554515/posts

Jesse Jackson Called the 'Godfather' of Shakedowns
CNSNews.com ^ | 10/23/01 | Marc Morano
Posted on 10/23/2001 5:15:12 AM by kattracks

(This is the second of two articles focusing on Jesse Jackson's business dealings)

(CNSNews.com) - A Washington D.C. public relations executive is warning clients about the consequences of "appeasement" in dealing with Jesse Jackson, and labels Jackson the "godfather" of corporate shakedowns."

Nick Nichols' book, entitled The Rules for Corporate Warriors: How to fight and survive attack group shakedowns, follows a highly publicized deal in August of this year between Jackson and Toyota Motor Sales USA, in which the automaker agreed to spend nearly $8 billion over ten years to increase minority participation in the company. Prior to the agreement, Jackson had threatened to organize a boycott against Toyota.

Toyota is also accused of buckling under Jackson's pressure by diverting a portion of a $300 million bond offering to supporters of the civil rights leader. Toyota claims the bond offering was merely a "coincidence," and unrelated to its agreement with Jackson to boost minority participation at the company.

"We have had protection rackets for several thousand years because they work. The Mafia has made protection an art form. Jackson has taken a lesson from history," Nichols told CNSNews.com.

He defines a shakedown as occurring when a group or individual like Jackson makes "a highly exaggerated or completely bogus allegation and the message to the company is you either do things our way or we are going to take this public, embarrass you, hurt you on Wall Street and do a lot of damage."

The next step, Nichols said, involves the corporation consulting with a public relations firm, which usually recommends that the company meet the demands of the pressure group. But Nichols cautions against taking this advice.

"That is the attitude that was held by [former British Prime Minister] Neville Chamberlain when he tried to do this with Adolf Hitler. It didn't get him anywhere and it's not going to get them anywhere," he stated.

When a company gives into these types of demands, they are open to even more pressure, according to Nichols.

"Once your corporation has been marked as a company that is prepared to pay up and roll over, other groups who also make a living from doing this kind of thing start to go after you," he stated. Nichols cites Starbucks' decision to meet the demands of the organic food industry as a recent example.

"Starbucks rolled over. Now every time you pick up the paper, someone new is attacking the company. It's an easy hit for people who simply want to engage in a protection activity."

Nichols expects more corporations to give in to the demands of Jackson because "a lot of corporate executives are getting counsel from PR flacks and others to basically engage in appeasement. It's a lot easier to do than to fight back."

A Quid Pro Quo?

Critics say Jackson's agreement with Toyota shows a familiar pattern.

Ken Boehm, chairman of the National Legal & Policy Center (NLPC), said Toyota's finance division sold a $300 million bond offering, with a portion going to two financial contributors of Jackson, just one week after Jackson's boycott was delayed. The NLPC filed a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service earlier this year alleging that Jackson's Citizenship Education Fund (CEF) had violated several tax code provisions.

"There is a $300 million security offering that gets farmed out through the underwriter to two of Jackson's biggest supporters on Wall Street," Boehm said, noting it happened just one week after Jackson announced he was delaying the boycott against Toyota.

"Sometimes things are exactly what they look like. This is one of those times," Nichols said. "You have a quid, a pro and a quo."

The New York Post reported that Toyota sold a $300 million issue of medium-term notes through Goldman Sachs, "listing two street firms whose owners are big Jackson supporters - Blaylock & Partners, and Williams Capital - as sellers of the issue."

Blaylock & Partners contributed $30,000 to CEF and also benefited from Jackson's opposition to a merger between AT&T and TCI, Boehm alleged. "[Jackson] dropped his opposition when the companies hired Blaylock & Partners to float an $8 billion bond offering. AT&T then gave [Jackson's] CEF $425,000," according to Boehm.

Williams Capital has given Jackson at least $50 thousand in contributions, Boehm said.

"That would be strictly coincidence and not part of our reason for using them," Mike Michels, a spokesman for Toyota told CNSNews.com, regarding the multi-million dollar medium-term note sale involving the two firms. "There was no quid pro quo," he said.

Boehm counters, "I think it is what is looks like. It is no coincidence at all. It was the payoff."

Jackson's Rainbow/PUSH organization threatened the nationwide boycott of Toyota because of a company ad featuring a black man with a gold tooth reflecting the company's RAV4 sport utility vehicle.

The ad was denounced as racist and Toyota quickly dropped it. But in May, Jackson began his boycott campaign demanding more minority participation in the company.

On June 20th, after a series of meetings with Toyota, Jackson announced he was postponing the boycott and set a deadline of Aug. 1 to resolve the issue. Toyota made it known that it wanted to resolve the boycott threat by working with Jackson to reach an accord. According to Boehm, the stock offering was made at the end of June and Toyota's agreement with Jackson's Rainbow/PUSH coalition to increase minority hiring was finalized Aug. 8.

Michels laments that there is a "lingering perception that our corporate diversity plan was in some way a contract or some kind of agreement with Rev. Jesse Jackson. It is not."

He instead credits Jackson with allowing Toyota "to delve into our diversity programs much more comprehensively than we had in the past" and giving the company "an excellent opportunity to look at it in a holistic fashion."

A Familiar Pattern?

Boehm believes Jackson's threatened Toyota boycott followed a familiar pattern.

"He makes a threat, the corporate folks who are being threatened cave in by giving money to Jackson's groups, or friends, or business associates and then a boycott is averted. That is exactly what happened here. It's a one, two and three that has characterized virtually every one of his boycotts," he said.

Keiana Peyton, a spokeswoman for Operation PUSH, told CNSNews.com that Jackson has been proven financially clean.

"In the probes that have already been completed, they have found no financial improprieties," she said.

Boehm said he is unaware of the "probes" referred to by Peyton. "To say he has been cleared, I would like to know who cleared him and when. Just about anytime he has ever come under official scrutiny, he has never come up clean," Boehm said.

When pressed to name the probes to which she was referring, Peyton would only reference a Jackson media relations effort earlier this year.

"We had a national press conference with CNN, local papers, FOX News. We gave them a tour of our financial records and financial offices and again those accusations that were raised, no evidence was found," she offered.

Boehm explained that "Jackson's entire career has been marked with financial irregularities going back to grant money in the 1970s with federal auditors to the present day use of charitable funds to pay his mistress." The latter accusation refers to a scandal that became public earlier this year when Jackson admitted he had fathered a child out of wedlock with a former employee, Karin Stanford. According to the NLPC, Jackson also may have used funds from his Citizenship Education Fund to help Stanford buy a house in Los Angeles, a charge Jackson's organization denies.

"There is a compelling pattern that Jackson helps those in the minority community that help him first," Boehm noted.

Peyton defended Jackson's tactics and said there was nothing unusual about them.

"There might be persons, that the reverend or our trade bureau members are familiar with their records, their work histories, their ability to provide services. The average person would only want to recommend persons that they have worked with personally or could vouch comfortably for them," she explained.

"But as far as it being exclusively for a particular group of people, that is not the case at all."

'Just Say No'

Nichols, who runs his own PR firm, counsels his clients to fight back against any potential shakedown artists. "The corporations who engage in [fighting back], normally you don't see much coverage of them because the attacker usually goes away once they find out they can't get away with it," he said.

When confronted, he advises clients to "just say no" and "notify federal law enforcement that your company is the potential target of a shakedown on the part of some group or organization." He maintains that reporting the activity to law enforcement would have a chilling effect on the group's pressure tactics.

For corporate executives skittish about such action, Nichols warns that they have no alternative. "You have to stand up and fight even if you do sustain some short term damage because in the long run the damage is going to be far greater," he advised.

 

Where's the bit about prostitution?

 

Jesse sells out blacks to hustle companies into giving him money. Just because you're getting pimped doesn't mean you do so willingly...............


http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Race Pimp

Race Pimp
A 'Race Pimp' is a race monger. They feed off racial tension and they live and die by racism. They offer nothing new, nothing good, nothing to repair, only conflict between the races. They are socially irresponsible, and think nothing of destroying innocent peoples names if it means furthering their own finances and level of fame. Reverend Wright from Chicago is the worst kind of Race Pimp because he uses the house of worship to race bait and sell his political agendas....and at the same time making a profit.
"Did you see Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson race Pimping on CNN today?"

 

Lol urban dictionary.

 

You can laugh all you like. You're too young to know any better and you live a world away. I live here in Chicago and have watched JJ do his pimping since for decades. Learn something.

 

Using urban dictionary is laughable.

ad hominem.

I never agreed with this, just pointed out he's not a pimp.

Says the guy using urban dictionary. Yeah right

 

Well here's another person using the term. Maybe he's 'laughable' also. And it isn't ad hominem to point out your age or where you live when it comes to this subject. It is a matter of fact.

http://theblacksphere.net/jesse-jackson-race-baiting-silicon-valley


Desperation of race pimp Jesse Jackson

Who knew Silicon Valley is racist!
Or is that where the money is? Jesse Jackson attended Hewlett-Packard’s annual shareholders meeting to spotlight the lack of minorities in high tech. Jackson claims that technology companies discriminate disproportionately in the hiring of “blacks and browns.”

According to Jackson, the comparison of blacks not getting high tech jobs versus blacks USE of high-tech is out of whack, or as Earl “Butch” Graves Jr., president and CEO of Black Enterprise magazine put it, “…companies don’t come close to hiring or spending what is commensurate with the demographics of their customers.”

Holy FUBU, as only one in 14 tech workers is black or Latino both in Silicon Valley and nationally. Blacks and Hispanics make up 13.1 and 16.9 percent of the U.S. population, respectively, according to the most recent census data.


Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/jesse-jackson-race-baiting-silicon-valley#efR6jHdjdOw4v0xw.99

 

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/05/black_race_pimps_im_callin_you.html



Black Race Pimps: I'm Callin' You Out!
By Lloyd Marcus


This news story totally infuriated me. Headline: Van Jones' Political Group Targets 'Celebrity Apprentice'.

Text by Daniel Miller, Reuters

"An African-American political advocacy group is targeting "Celebrity Apprentice" star Donald Trump in the aftermath of what many feel are racially tinged political comments made about President Obama.

On Thursday, the organization ColorOfChange launched a Twitter-based campaign to persuade black "Celebrity Apprentice" cast members Star Jones and Lil Jon to denounce Trump for what the group terms "race-baiting."

I am so sick of these racist so-called civil rights groups bullying people with race. It is an indisputable fact that the liberal mainstream media exempted presidential candidate Barack Hussein Obama from the usual vetting process of one seeking to be elected Leader of the Free World. Obama's skin color trumped everything.

Thus, for the first time in U.S. history, we have a president who cannot be criticized in any way. "Hear ye, hear ye, all who dare criticize King Obama is automatically guilty of racism and will suffer the consequences!" This is totally absurd and insane.

Obama has been in the Oval Office for two years. Black race pimps continue to despicably, without reservation, drive a wedge into the heart of national race relations. Whenever these black race pimps, including the Obama administration, find themselves on the losing end of an argument, they turn it into a racial issue branding the opposition racist.

President Obama would not have responded to Trump's request for him to present his birth certificate unless he felt he had to do it. Obviously, polling data must have confirmed that millions of Americans felt Trump's request was reasonable.

In response to the uppity white boy who dared question their king, a few black celebrities and black bullies disguised as "civil rights" groups are calling Donald Trump a racist targeting him for destruction. So, are all of the other Americans curious about why Obama was not presenting his birth certificate racist as well? Will somebody please tell these black racist bullies to stop it and get a life?

If we are ever to move forward as a nation, we must call out race pimps of all colors. We do not tolerate "white" skinheads. Nor, should we tolerate "black" racists.

Incredibly, black race pimps feel their racism is OK. It is as if they view America's original sin of slavery as their, "Right to be Racist For Free" card. Using race to bully people into submitting to an agenda is racist, pure and simple.

I watched a black intellectual on TV shilling for Obama. He used a plethora of big words to cover the simple school yard truth that he was a black bully racist, committed to Obama no matter what. Sounding extremely intelligent, the black racist was spouting lies and illogical stupid conclusions. But man, did he sound "smart."

Liberals do this all the time. They have a basic emotion-driven dislike for America and all of the traditions and values which have made us great. They hide their disdain for America under a shroud of intellectual mumbo-jumbo; spouting crazy stupid nonsense which sounds above our ability to understand. I call it, "Intellectual Stupid Speak."

My fellow Americans, racism is ugly and evil. Most Americans agree and reject it. So, when I see black race pimps like the ColorOfChange using race to bully people, it turns my stomach.

And, something else that truly annoys me. The black community is not a tribe with chiefs dictating our monolithic opinion. I ask that these disgusting race baiting organizations please stop running around proclaiming they speak for "the black community". I am black. They do not speak for me.

As long as the Good Lord gives me strength, I will call out hate inspiring race dividers. God Bless.

- - - Updated - - -

Ad hominem?

 

Dont know about him, that would be ad hominem, but his use the word would be yes.

Yes it is.

But you're using it to say my knowledge and argument is limited because of my age and location. That is ad hominem.

http://theblacksphere.net/jesse-jackson-race-baiting-silicon-valley


Desperation of race pimp Jesse Jackson

Who knew Silicon Valley is racist!
Or is that where the money is? Jesse Jackson attended Hewlett-Packard’s annual shareholders meeting to spotlight the lack of minorities in high tech. Jackson claims that technology companies discriminate disproportionately in the hiring of “blacks and browns.”

According to Jackson, the comparison of blacks not getting high tech jobs versus blacks USE of high-tech is out of whack, or as Earl “Butch” Graves Jr., president and CEO of Black Enterprise magazine put it, “…companies don’t come close to hiring or spending what is commensurate with the demographics of their customers.”

Holy FUBU, as only one in 14 tech workers is black or Latino both in Silicon Valley and nationally. Blacks and Hispanics make up 13.1 and 16.9 percent of the U.S. population, respectively, according to the most recent census data.

Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/jesse-jackson-race-baiting-silicon-valley#efR6jHdjdOw4v0xw.99[/QUOTE]

 

American thinker is a terrible source of info it must be said though.

Nope because it's not an argument or a point on why your argument is poor. My argument was in the fact you justified yourself with urban dictionary.