Are you saying one man arrested for the disappearance of his wife that submitted in her name completely toppled the entire election process? Nobody, left or right, has ever said the system is 100% impenetrable by fraud. The position against the allegations of fraud is based on there not being a drop of evidence it was pervasive. P.S. Unpossible is not a word.
To them, one case of fraud means there were million cases of fraud that slipped through the cracks. Then when no fraud is found in a county, they say it's impossible there wasn't a single case of fraud among millions of voters. Rinse and repeat.
Georgia did not let the double secret NewsMax Ninjas to check signatures and test for bamboo. Thus Trump won.
He is. He's completely robbed his supporters of reality. Some of the things just make no sense such as being in disbelief historically deep blue states voted overwhelmingly for Biden.
Yes. The troubling part for me is that they don't seem to register that he was planting that seed long before the election happened. Unless they want to claim that he's psychic, there is no other explanation for how/why he would assume the election would be fraudulent. Had I been one of his supporters that would have given me pause. My theory is that he knew the public was upset by his horrendous pandemic response and that would show at the polls. People were locked down (leading to isolation stress and suicide in some cases), lost family members and friends to COVID, lost their jobs, some even lost their housing and/or vehicles because they just couldn't pay when some businesses were shuttered. Some small business owners ended up shutting down for good. So, to offset that, he start to spin the tale of widespread corruption, election interference, dead people voting, purple unicorns, etc.. He needed to have a way to keep people roped into the idea that he was being targeted. What I find MOST telling in the here and now...he recently shut down his blog page because of lack of interest. I've read countless posts in which people said that it was "impossible" for Biden to get more votes when comparing audiences at rallies. Ignoring the fact that is not a proper gauge of how a candidate will fair in an election, where are these millions and millions of people that support him? Trump is in his 70s. If he hasn't mastered self-esteem within himself by now, it's a lost game. The hurdle will be getting his staunch supporters to understand just how childish, self-absorbed and dysfunctional he really is.
That's only because your news sources lie you and you believe them. Voter fraud stays show there's about 0.0000004% voter fraud.
Of what we know of. How many fraudulent votes does it take to change the outcome of an election? Are you claiming because it is as small as you claim there has never been an election where the outcome was determined by fraudulent votes? Is your number an actual recount contacting each voter to determine if in fact they were the one who voted and for whom they cast their vote or just some theoretical number based on extrapolations, conjecture and assumptions? And BTW the 2000 election was decided by .0004% of the vote in Florida.
The 2000 election was decided by .0004% of the vote in Florida. 238 votes out of 5,825,043 votes so stop with the fraud is so rare it doesn't matter canard. All across the country there are close local elections where just a few case of fraud could swing the results. In Virginia 2016 just ONE fraudulent vote could have determined which party controlled the statehouse. So again stop with the canard.
To the exclusion of other voting? I don't think so. I think it is a pretty clear case here and it doesn't have to be an orchestrated conspiracy to affect and election. And again was the person in the OP being investigated for voter fraud and that is how he got caught or was it just happenstance due to him being investigated for something else?
We're talking THIS people. He was caught by happenstance during a murder investigation. The police were not investigating voter fraud, the election commission didn't catch it because "the system worked" what an ABSURD claim. And it doesn't have to be a substantial amount to affect the outcome of an election. And another absurd statement that if we can't prevent it all we should try to prevent at all. How about if we can't come up with a tax system that is 100% resistant to cheating we don't try to prevent cheating? And what was being done the last 4 years, how about better voter ID?
Exactly. This is why they're now starting to do fake audits conducted by Trump supporters. Even if they can't find actual fraud, they will invent it for propaganda purposes.
That's what those of that ilk do. Their lord and savior is the world's biggest liar. Why shouldn't they emulate that?
I think it is a pretty clear case here You know the OP. A clear case of mail in fraud we would never have known about had the the police not arrested him for murder and they searched the house. How much goes unnoticed?
Wrong. This is straight from the article. So it was the county who alerted the authorities. They were aware a person was missing or dead, and the system caught the ballot.