Voter fraud discovered

Because it has to be proven to be widespread if you are going to make it harder to vote. More people who vote = more opportunity for fraud no matter what safeguards you have in place. Does that mean we should have as few as many people possible voting to prevent fraud?

If you have 2 fraudulent vote for every 300,000 votes, I would say that pretty acceptable because you increased voter turnout.

Or would you have 1 fraudulent vote for every 150,000 votes? I tend to believe increasing voter participation is much more desired.

 

If you claim it has, you have to prove it. Or else it's just made up.

You tell us, you make the claim. Significant to change an outcome, which at the prez leve has never ever never ever happened.

No, trump losing in multiple states is not the 1st time it has happened. It actually happens a lot. That's why he lost in a landslide. By his definition 4 yrs ago.

 

Where have I claimed it HAS, I've made no such claim although I am not stupid enough to believe voter fraud has NEVER changed the outcome of an election. Are YOU making the claim there has never been an election that was swayed by voter fraud?

I have shown you where ONE vote, just vote could have swayed the SIGNIFICANT election in Virginia which determined which party would control the statehouse, so are you denying just ONE fraudulent vote could be significant? What about for a local mayor where the margin is single digit how SIGNIFICANT does it have to be? How about Florida 2000 how SIGNIFICANT would it have had to be to change the outcome?

Why do you ONLY want to discuss the 2016 election for Trump why do you pretend that is the ONLY election that has ever been held?

 

So your point you've been making is fantasy at this time.
Which election has been swayed by fraud?
Anything is possible. But it is extremely difficult. So do you have an actual case?

Could have been swayed, but caught, means our system is really good.
Voter fraud can never be 0.00%.

 

Are you claiming voter fraud does not exist? Are you claiming voter fraud has never changed the outcome of an election? Are you claiming that voter fraud has to be "significant" as in huge numbers to affect and election?

If no then what are you arguing? Why do you believe the 2020 election is the ONLY election that matters?

And what system do we have to catch it? The fallacious claim was that the OP proves the system works, can explain how it proves the system works.

 

Well that takes the cake...sick.

 

Are you capable of reading the post you reply to?

What does anything is possible mean to you?

 

So you admit that the cases found in the 2020 election are EXCLUSIVELY MAGATs, so far.

 

So what? You're trying to excuse it or something? It's OK because they were Trump supporters?

 

It's certainly ironic, wouldn't you agree?

 

Not really I don't care which side the fraud is on why would it being on the Trump side excuse it?

And just two of the many Dem side


https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud-print/search