Atheist obsession with god

The terminology I have used is "telling lies", "prevaricator", I don't recall any others that I have used. But I do know that I have not called anyone a 'liar'. Now, am I in violation of the TOS? I don't believe I am.

Not according to the TOS.

I find them effective in this secular society.

No, they are the equivalent. "in·teg·ri·ty (n-tgr-t)
n.
1. Steadfast adherence to a strict moral or ethical code.
2. The state of being unimpaired; soundness.
3. The quality or condition of being whole or undivided; completeness."

Apparently not.

Yep... semantics all the way. Goodnight.

 

So you believe dividing your allegiance regarding your behavior between the rules of a secular society and your obligation to your God aligns with the definition of integrity you posted?
You now believe that the TOS has authority over actual semantic distinctions, and are not just rules for PF?

Can't you see how stupid this stuff is? How compromised you are?
Can't you see why people are laughing, and God must be crying?

 

all I can say is I am extremely proud to be a member of a forum whose rules actually define what words mean!! I have just thrown my oxford dictionary in the garbage and will be coming here for all my definitions from now on.

 

Is that what I said?

Are you now attempting to dictate what I believe?

What stuff?

I am not compromised. There is no one on this forum who has the ability to compromise me.

I look around and see no one laughing and the Holy Spirit assures me that God is not crying except for those that would mock Him. Hello non-theists.

- - - Updated - - -

That is about the best idea you have come up with. Come on back anytime you have a question regarding the definition of a term and I will gladly point you in the right direction.

 

I doubt I could stop laughing long enough to listen

 

That would suggest that you are one of those who does not want to learn anything.

 

cant fight the autonomic nervous system

 

Now what pray tell does the autonomic nervous system have to do with an unwillingness to learn? Or are you suggesting that you are afflicted with some disease of that nervous system that places you in spells of uncontrollable laughter? Remember, the autonomic nervous system regulates the involuntary functions of the body... not those that are willed to happen.

 

Ahhhh. So you are suffering from Pseudobulbar affect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudobulbar_affect
You do realize that such a condition is neurologic, don't you?

 

SORRY PAL, THATS ONLY ONE OF THE INVOLUNTARY SCENARIOS

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laughter

 

Well, I am not your physician, so based on the skimpy information provided, the one I posted seemed the most likely. I do wish you well however. . . you know what they say about wishes.

 

youre not anyones physician. and its you who makes my time here so entertaining, so your wish came true

 

You know, I thought this whole "Incorporeal is making me laugh" meme was childish. But all I had to do was scroll back a few pages to find a gem like this. A divine spirit is guiding you on this perilous journey of debate on an internet forum. This really is comedy gold.

 

I told ya!

 

Yes! Definitively speaking it is a FACT (www.thefreedictionary.com/fact )(2.c.) and there is no way that you can prove me wrong. You can scoff all you want but the dictionary has served its purpose in throwing something in your face that you cannot prove to be false or non existent. So, Yes again, you are presenting a comedy gold in the face of a fact that you cannot disprove.

- - - Updated - - -

Did I ever say that I was "anyones" physician? No? Then your post is irrelevant.

 

Sorry pal... that citation I gave, listed several scenarios. You need to learn how to read and stay focused on what is printed in front of you.

 

but you only offered one diagnosis! try again, pal

- - - Updated - - -

not to me

 

Dude you just bit off your own tongue. Previously you stated that I am not anyones physician... as such, it is beyond my legal and ethical authority to offer a diagnoses for anyone. Aside from the legal and ethical issue, it was not me that offered a 'diagnoses' it was the article that was published... (which by the way, I do believe is supportive of your condition... after all, you did state that you cant fight the autonomic nervous system.)

 

your words pal! try again

Ahhhh. So you are suffering from Pseudobulbar affect.

 

And you have already disqualified me as being your physician or the physician of anyone else... therefore, it is not a diagnosis. It is a lay persons opinion.

 

nuttin about physicians here pal. you aint doin so well today!! lol

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/diagnosis

 

It's just as much a fact as Russell's teapot, just as amusing, and just as obviously posturing. Disclaimer added for the hard of thinking: IN MY OPINION.

 

Hey, if you believe that Russell's teapot is really out there in space... that is your privilege... believe what you want and it is still a definitive 'fact'.

- - - Updated - - -

Well, stick this court case in your pipe and smoke it:
"The only evidence to provide a connection between the
veteran's service-connected disabilities and the veteran's
cause of death is the appellant's opinion. As a lay person,
however, she is not competent to make medical judgments. See
Espiritu v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 492 (1994). "

 

Not saying it isn't. Just amused at the absurdity of it.

 

far be it from me to ever accuse you of being competent!! didn't seem to stop you from making the attempt however!! hahahahaahahahaha