Islamist militants strike heart of Tehran, Iran blames Saudis

You're welcome.

 

This is your proof that at this moment of time Iran is the number one sponsor of terrorism
How many people were killed in those 40 years?

The US invaded Iraq so any soldiers killed was at a time of war.

AMIA Bombing : From your own link: "According to the prosecution's claims in 2006, Argentina had been targeted by Iran after Buenos Aires' decision to suspend a nuclear technology transfer contract to Tehran.[12] This has been disputed because the contract was never terminated, and Iran and Argentina were negotiating on restoration of full cooperation on all agreements from early 1992 until 1994, when the bombing occurred"

Alan Chiricanas Flight 901 ! - You really should check your proofs! "Soon after Flight 00901 crashed, an organization using the name Ansar Allah, or "Followers of God", issued a statement expressing support for the bombing, and claiming that the attack was a suicide operation by a person with an Arab name. Later, it was determined the organization did not exist. Panamanian authorities have made no arrests in connection with the bombing; The case remains officially unsolved."

Kenya - no one died!

Al- Queda Not only does your link state "alleged" which is crap anyway - Shia hate Al queda!

Michael Weiss! Who the hell is he? A journalist is your proof! He accuses Iran of the death of civilians when attacking Daesh, err, have you forgotten that 200 Mosul civilians were blown up by one US missile just a few weeks ago!

 

reported your post.

Iran is not an enemy. Never was and never will be. Infact its one of the few trustworthy nations in the middle east.

 

People like this, well....there is no proof, of any kind that they'd find acceptable. If khameini stood on a podium and described in detail each instance of the terrorist acts committed by iran since 1980 these people would claim he was lying, drugged, etc. Once one accepts that they will never be convinced - or have an agenda which could have been purchased - their posts become nothing more than a passing leaf in the wind.

 

Trustworthy to who? Let's not go off the deep end here, iran is a cancerous, murderous terrorist dictatorship whose regime's death cannot come soon enough.

 

Only a moral and intellectual pygmy would make excuses for the Islamofascist autocracy in Iran, hold others responsible for that regime's own attitude and behavior and find fault with the people who view it in a negative light.

Here's something else to remember - President Obama made a naive and foolish attempt to mend relations with that regime but they repaid his good intentions with scorn and hostility.

Iran is a dictatorship today because the regime in power refuses to respect the human, civil and political rights of the Iranian people, and for that they are solely to blame.

 

Probably the thread's best, most accurate post. Kudos.

 

You didn't disprove anything. You're giving your own opinions and calling it "wrong". Iran has been sponsoring terror in Iraq for decades. The fact that you're denying it, and denying it from the source, means you're very ignorant in this subject, and you support terrorism.

But nice deflection.

 

You reported my post?

What a shitty thing to do

 

By the same token the Irish had a right to resist the occupation of their country by a belligerent occupier that slaughtered its people like cattle. You call that terrorism, and I call your complaints abject hypocrisy.

 

Perhaps not but, you are very capable of ingesting state propaganda so that your tax dollars can be spent on arming supporting Al Qaeda.

 

Do you not see a difference between some group attacking and killing people simply because they do not share the groups extremist ideology - and a group attacking and killing people that are oppressing them ?

 

Perhaps you can give your proof that at this moment of time Iran is the number one sponsor of terrorism?

 

How can it be my own opinions when I used extracts from your link? So again, how many people were killed in those 40 years? Remember what your post was to prove? It was to prove that Iran at this moment in time are the number one sponsor of terrorism and your proof has failed dismally

 

I am very capable of understanding what taking American Hostages means independent of "propaganda"

 

You extracted one piece of a source that provided a hundred.

You're like a 9/11 conspiracy theorist that takes on tiny piece of the story and ONLY focuses on that. Prove everything else wrong or move on.

 

It is not Iran that has taken America Hostage. We now live in a propaganda state. You seem to have blindly ingested the anti-Iran propaganda.

 

The iranians seized the US embassy in tehran and held them for more than one year during the carter adminstration circa 1979-80

 

I addressed your snipped extracts in your post and showed them to be worthless as evidence of Iran being the number one sponsor of terrorism at this moment in time.

 

No you didn't. Just a tiny piece with your OPINION. But we get it. Some people support that kinda crap. I could show you a video of the supreme leader handing terrorists a check and you'd say "what evidence"?

 

I do not see the relevance of your red herring.

 

I was not referring to that.

 

It is not a red herring. Explain how my post is a red herring.

Given your lack of understanding of the difference between attacking someone who is attacking you and attacking someone who is not - it is not surprising you do not see the relevance.

 

Perhaps you can state what nature of "proof" you'd accept. Not that I have any interest in convincing you or wasting any of my time on making an effort to do so, but perhaps someone else on the forum might.

So state what proof from what source, and perhaps someone more interested in conversing with you might take you up on it.

 

According to certain people, attacks on Israelis are not terrorism. Attacks on civilians elsewhere are, but not there.