No 2nd Amendment for Blacks?

If someone aimed a punch at you and missed, would you be in the right to punch back or do you have to wait for one of the next punches to hit you before you strike back?

 

The police have already taken back the claim that he was brandishing his gun

 

Not sure why it is so hard for people to understand that the ideologies of the parties switched in the 20th century.

 

They do in liberal cities like Chicago where the NRA had to step in to sue the city and stop them from denying blacks their conceal carry permits.

 

They didn’t, they just drew closer together.

 

Still, a fight that lead to a death over a frigging word, in a country built on free speech. The driver didn’t even have to get out of his truck, but he did. Some one calls you a name and that gives you license to kill?

My take, it was an unnecessary altercation that either men could have walked away from. But I wouldn’t have charged the Fed Ex driver either. But still, a loss of life over a stupid frigging word.

So stupid, so bloody stupid; both stories.

 

Reagan as Governor of California repealed the 2nd because of the Black Panthers.

https://www.history.com/news/black-panthers-gun-control-nra-support-mulford-act

 

Because its a lie with zero evidence to the claim. Just cause the GOP controls the south, doesn't mean they adopted the racist segregation policies of the democrats had back then or promote now in certain parts of the country. Not a single policy or platform that the dixiecrats had is a policy the GOP espouses today. Regional coverage doesn't mean anything.

 

Oh, what is the new terminology now the left is using when you try to go back in history to make a point? Whataboutism?

But its funny that now, 50 years later, the only people still acting the way you described in the article is the democrats. Reagan was a prude on a whole host of ideals, like guns and drugs. He, like Trump, never really shook of their democrat leanings on things like this. Their big government control. It was when the left became communist sympathizers is why Reagan switched parties, but he was never really a small government conservative on many social aspects.

 

I really liked this article. I fully support what the BP did back then. And they helped change the minds of many people, including the NRA who has fought side by side with blacks since the 60s to keep their equal rights of the 2A. Its amazing how 50 years can change the culture and country for the better. Its almost like the idea of racism is going away, now if we can only get rid of the few people who make their very lucrative livings off being race hustlers, we might get to be a united country.

 

Good post. We should have the right to carry guns. Black people doing that is too scary apparently.

 

Do blacks still hunt and eat possums ?

If they do, they have every right to own guns.

The problem beginning during the 1960's, to many political radical blacks like the Black Panthers abused their Second Amendment rights and the Crips, Bloods and other black thugs did the same thing.

So what was the response ? Punish the other 99% of law abiding Americans with Nazi gun laws.

 

Same with white people carrying guns. You get many of the prudes who never seen a gun and only have been traumatized by TV who think a .22 round from an AR-15 can blow a 15 inch diameter hole in a paper target going after anyone openly carrying. This officer should be tried.

 

With the Immigration Reform Act of 1965 that allowed criminals, the uneducated, unskilled, poverty proan immigrants into our country, open borders, change migration and way to many people from shithole countries into America there was going to be a change in America's demographics, culture, values, language and politics.

The Second Amendment worked in America for 200 years and it would work in Northern Europe back when Europe was still Europe.
But the Second Amendment would never work in some shithole country.

 

The NRA applauded when Reagan outlawed open carry among the Black Panthers:



FACT CHECK: Did the NRA Support a 1967 'Open Carry' Ban in ...

https://www.snopes.com › Fact Check › Politics
Claim: The National Rifle Association supported the passage of a 1967 bill in the California legislature banning the open carry of loaded firearms in public.
Fact check by Snopes.com: True

 

Actually it already happened but it was shotguns and bolt action rifles not AR's when the Black Panthers abused their Second Amendment rights and tried to enter the California State Capitol building during the 1960's.





The state legislature response was to punish every law abiding citizen with California's first Nazi gun law.

 

Evil is using a certain race to destroy another one. And not caring how many innocent blacks have to kill each other while doing so.
Nobody but libs are responsible for all the blood spilled in ghettos aka 'democratic welfare plantations' long as the agenda is met.
Young black men kill more blacks than anything. Blacks are involved in 70% of crime yet only 13 % pf population.
Thanks Libs.

 

Making a blanket statement based on one cited incident demonstrates that this Trevor Noah character is not an intellectual giant. That being said he sort of has a point. A little research into gun control shows a clear desire to disarm black people and the most stringent gun control laws are in urban areas with a large black population -- so it is true that liberals want to disarm black people. And not just liberals. Look at Reagan's support of the Mulford act intended to disarm black people. The question I have to ask is why do black people support politicians who want to disarm them? Apparently in return for the welfare provided by liberals black people are totally willing to surrender their Constitutional rights.

 

You might google that Governor candidate in Georgia I believe it was, who had some people 'campaigning' for her. It pretty much covers your statement. And I haven't heard anyone call for a ban yet.

 

If blacks ever realize they are used by foreign mafias and cartels and their people die a 1000 deaths maybe then they will have freed themselves from the slavery of said groups and become responsible and stop killing each other with guns but rather use guns to protect their homes from crimes.

 

You guys can call it racism if you want, but it is simply what happens when you have the same things repeat themselves.

If a police officer goes to 20 shooting scenes and 19 of them are from black folks, it is likely that the officer will be more cautious because of his life experiences. Can you legislate away from this? I personally don't think so, any attempt to do it so far has just made it so the police stop policing those areas which is even more sad.

If I see 20 Prius' on the freeway and 19 of them are horrible drivers, am I expecting the 20th to be horrible? Yeah, god I hate those things ....

Is this action "racist" when it is not caused by hatred or anything else, but simply a precaution the brain has set up similarly to not touching a hot stove again?

This is the problem with changing what the idea of racism means, you get to claim that anything that happens, no matter what the actual data and statistics look like, is racissss.

It has made the entire idea mean nothing and sadly I think black people are more racist against whites and whites are more racist against blacks than 10 years ago.

Now, even disagreeing with someone of color (or if they are female) brands you a racist (or sexist).

Tough to have an actual conversation about this kinda stuff.

Either way, prayers to the poor guy in the middle of it all. It surprises me that people immediately lash out blaming the cop instead of the guy who the cop was after for such a tragic accident.

 

Here are some articles that not only show that they did, but give the reasons why.
https://www.livescience.com/34241-democratic-republican-parties-switch-platforms.html
http://factmyth.com/factoids/democrats-and-republicans-switched-platforms/

 

A lot of M-1 Carbines with 30 round magazine’s there. The only real difference between them and an AR is the ammunition.

 

I told you specifically how I can prove racism is all present in the US justice department, but you want me to prove the point of Trevor? How about you call up Trevor and ask him to prove his own point? Dunno why you picked me to do that for him and for you. It doesn't debunk my claim anyways.

 

When a cop gets a call that there is a shootout at a synagoge. Old Jews got their freaking brains shot out for praying. A couple of your fellow cops get shot as well. But you still manage to arrest the white mass killer. So bravo. On a next occasion, you get called for a shootout. A bunch of people got killed, and you spot a black dude with a gun, and so you're just pumping him full of lead to eventually it ends up that you shot the armed security guard.

Yeah... no matter how your previous experiences were... you honestly can not explain how a cop gets to arrest an obvious mass killer who is white, and an innocent black dude doing his job. It's just how cops and basically how Americans react to black people vs white.


All this is,... is giving the entire black community the experience that you can not trust cops.
It works the other way around, champ.