Brunei to Punish Adultery and Gay Sex With Death by Stoning

But do they disapprove of the ancient Jews doing it during ancient times? Do they disapprove of stoning gays being part of the Law of Moses and being followed before Jesus came along? And how is stoning gays wrong today, but totally being ok part of the Law of Moses?

 

Christians follow the new testament not the old one. The old on is only there for reference to what the world was like before Christ, it isn't to be followed. There were no christians in the old testament.

 

Of course they disaproved, hence why they became christians instead of staying jews.

 

And you never will.

 

But they approve of the Law of Moses being followed before Jesus. Christians believe that Jesus fulfilled the Law of Moses and it should only not be followed after him, not that it should never have been the law. This means they approve of the ancient Jews stoning gays.

 

What part of “ancient” do you not understand?

 

Ancient means a very long time ago. So how is murdering gay people in ancient times not as bad as doing it today?

 

Yes, long ago

Meaning not now

 

Fulfilled, meaning they don't apply anymore...
They didn't approve hence why they became christians. And your reasonning is quite silly if you have to refer to 2000+ years old laws that haven't been followed by anyone for centuries to excuse acts commited today by the muslims. Do grow up.

 

In ancient time... Not today. We live in the now. Try to capiche.

 

error

 

Stoning gays is in the Law of Moses. Christians believe that the Law of Moses was the word of God and was meant to be followed before Jesus fulfilled it.

 

LOLOLOOLL

there were no Christians before Jesus.

 

Christians actually approve of the Law of Moses and believe it to be the word of God. They believe that it was fulfilled by Jesus, but it was valid law before Jesus.

 

LOLOL

If you cannot understand it the tenth time you are told.

what makes you think you will understand it the 11th???

 

Christians approve of the Law of Moses being in effect before Jesus. Which means they approve of pre-Christian Jews stoning gays as part of the Law of Moses. How can stoning gays be fine back then but horrific today?

 

And what Christians approve of this.

And BTW.

there were lots of laws 3000 years ago that are not followed today.

Hell, the people before Muhammed killed baby girls.
That isn't allowed today.

 

Trolling mode engaged!
Welcome to the ignore bin.

 

I think I should do that also.

 

Christians today currently approve of the pre-Christian Jews stoning gays. Sorry you are upset.

 

LOLOLOL

I think if they approved it they wouldn't have changed the laws.

 

He still won't understand the difference no matter how often it's explained.

 

Can I ask you something, why are gays so wrapped up in themselves?

Anyway civilization like everything else has a growth factor - and by civilization I mean the moral and spiritual growth of a society. The growth started when God revealed Himself to Abraham and stopped him from sacrificing his son - something that was rampant at the time to appease the gods. Then it progressed further with Moses and the Ten Commandments.

God finally revealed Himself fully and showed that He consisted of Pure Love by incarnating His Word/Son into flesh and having Him suffer every humiliation and pain imaginable to redeem mankind.

My point is you cannot relate the immaturity of the pre Christian world, to that of an after Christ world. This does not mean that homosexuality by its mere emphasis on bodily satisfaction is not an offense to the very nature of God's Creation. Of course it is, but in Christianity repentance is key. The longer one lives, the greater the chance for repenting and entering God's realm.




.

 

I don't see any evidence of this. Beyond your having written it several times here. Why would you continue to demand folks take you seriously?

 

Show me the commandment to have slaves or practice slavery. Yes there are laws and rules on how to treat slaves, but nothing commanding one to have them. So it is quite easy and legitimate to disapprove of the keeping of slaves, even if they did keep them in accordance with scriptures.