This guy gets it

Exactly which is why this article is so moronic ... there was no attempted "Coup" .. no "Insurrection" by the Capital protesters .. and connecting this somehow to "ISIS" is doubly moronic.

Most every politician tries to maintain power via corrupt means == although not sure what you are calling "Corrupt" here -- as a generalization this is meaningless. Take Hillary and the DNC for example .. what she did to Bernie "Meddling in our Electoral Process" far worse than anything Trump has been accused of w/r to actuall election meddling.

 

trump would have had troops and tanks in the street (else what was the point of firing the relevant dod officials and appointing his loyalists). remember those generals that he was smarter than? maybe they ain't so dumb after all.

 

Wow, how unusual, an Orangeman bad thread

 

Finding the facts annoying?

 

Democrats facts? Bwahahahaha!!!

 

Yes .. another where some moron is quoted who calls the unarmed protesters at the Capitol an "Insurrection" a "Coup" - as if this these folks had a legitimate chance of taking over the Nation.

What kind of idiot is this commentator - how stupid does a person have to be to actually believe such a thing .. since when has a coup that has succeeded .. "Bloodless or Bloody" that did not have the support of the Army behind it.

Then we have moron's like Biden calling these protestors "Terrorists" .. and not only that .. any who were involved with the protest .. or who spoke to the protestors . were also labeled terrorists.

So .. God forbid you join a peaceful protest .. where someone kicks over a garbage can and breaks a window .. as you are now a "Domestic Terrorist" How stupid does one have to be to accept this nonsense... sans the one who deeply wishes for an Authoritarian Police state.

 

I would agree Trump had no chance to pull off his attempt to stay in power. But I have to ask, why are you in denial about the lengths to which he tried? He attempted a coup. It may have been a flimsy attempt but it was an attempt nonetheless.

Convincing millions of Americans the election was stolen with no evidence.....check.
Summoning elections officials from MI to the WH, trying to get friendly state legislatures to appoint electors who would overturn the will of the voters........check.
Calling Raffensberger in GA "find" 11,800 votes in order to overturn the results there......check.
Getting his attorneys to write faux legal memos to prevent Pence from certifying the election https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mem...ence-overturn-election-book/story?id=81134003
https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/21/politics/read-eastman-memo/index.html.......check.
Trying to convince the acting AG to call the election corrupt and then "leave the rest to me" and other allies in Congress......check.

 

Not in denial of anything .. other than that which you have now agreed with. Never have I denied that Trump tried to overturn the election results via speaking out against the process.. What I deny is that the protest was an insurrection .. that these folks should be labeled "Domestic Terrorists.

None of which constitutes an "Insurrection" or a "Coup" .. but a legitimate action known as free speech.

 

“”Donald Trump thought he could engineer a coup”” will be the battle cry of the Democrats through the mid-term election to deflect away from Biden unquestionable bad and anti-American politics… the real terrorist is our present leadership trying to take America down from within.

 

Calling Trump's conversation with Raffensberger free speech completely ignores the purpose of the call. It's as intellectually dishonest as one can be.

 

If the plan was to have Americans divided...that plan is still fully successful and in currently in play. But not by Trump.

So. You know. There's that.

You did solve the mean tweets though!

 

Well cut him some slack bro. Right leaning violence and crime is at a low right now. Gotta keep the attention off of the left leaning, minority crime and violence ffs.

Spoiler: Shhhhhh!!!

https://nypost.com/2021/11/11/blm-l...reatens-riots-after-sit-down-with-eric-adams/

 

AHHHHHH THEY ARE WALKING SINGLE FILE!!!, OBEYING THE PARTITIANS! AHHHHHHH!

Meanwhile, in Kenosha!

 

Interesting. What's your evidence? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/sep/08/post-911-domestic-terror

 

My evidence? The lack of rioting from the right. LOL.

 

But........you understand there's more to crime and violence than rioting, right? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/sep/08/post-911-domestic-terror

 

I didn't call Trumps convo with Raff "Free speech" You suggesting I did is the only intellecutally dishonest thing going on here -- in a desperate attempt to divert from the fact that none of these things constituted "Insurrection" "coup"

Now get an argument ..

 

This is how "credible" your link is

We literally JUST had a court case to discount this narrative



How embarrasing.

 

You referred to my list of actions Trump took, including the Raffensberger call, by writing....... "None of which constitutes an "Insurrection" or a "Coup" .. but a legitimate action known as free speech."

Stop misrepresenting what you wrote.

 

Not annoying, repetitive
Left wing riots get a week of coverage and this gets almost a year
I guess this is what happens when you have one right wing riot to every 20 left wing riots

 

Did you bother to read the post I responded to? You really didn't have an argument so you just dismissed my response because I actually made a point you just could allow to go unchallenged. .

 

The BLM protests were covered for months and are still being invoked by The Following as a fatuous defense/comparison for the mob's efforts on behalf of Trump to stop Biden's certification as prez.

 

becoming a politician is a get rich quick scheme ...

 

You are the one guilty of "Intellectual Dishonesty. The conversation is about "Insurrection" "Coup" which you agreed with in relation to the capital protest .. but then gave a laundry list of items .. NONE of which constituted Insurrection "Coup" .. but most of which were Free Speech.

So what does the intellectually dishonest person do .. in desperate attempt to deflect the fact that "Nothing in your list constituted "insurrection" or "Coup" .. and pulled out one thing in a laundry list full of examples of free speech .. that might not be contrued as free speech .. in a conversation that is not about "Free Speech" in general.

This is the height of intellectual dishonesty .. desperate to deflect from the reality that there was no "Insurrection" was no "Coup".

 

Ahh I see how you called them “protests”
Very funny
Is looting and burning part of “protests”?
At which point is it a riot?
I also noticed you said protests plural
There’s your answer right there. Thanks for proving massive unfair coverage and double standards
How were they gonna change the election? Was q anon shaman gonna take on the military?
I hope you realize how silly that sounds.
Please come back to the land of reality. It might not be as fun as your alternate universe but at least it’s real!