Biden touts potential border deal with Senate as Speaker Mike Johnson says bill 'dead on arrival' in

Unless there's a legit asylum case??

Remember trump could not stop illegal immigration either. His best attempt was a pandemic health clause in the law.

...
How has the level of U.S. asylum claims changed over time?

Daily News Brief

A summary of global news developments with CFR analysis delivered to your inbox each morning. Weekdays.

">View all newsletters >
Prior to the passage of the Refugee Act of 1980, the U.S. government granted asylum on an ad hoc basis, including in the aftermath of World War II and during the Cold War, though at times it refused asylum to certain immigrant groups. The 1980 law created the current statutory basis for asylum, guaranteeing family reunification rights and providing asylees, or migrants who receive asylum, with a path to permanent residency after one year.
https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/seeking-protection-how-us-asylum-process-works

 

Liberals are on odd bunch. They think the solution to an administration failing to enforce the law is to enact more new laws.


When you tell them what specific laws not being enforced, they just go into denial mode. They can’t actually discuss the issues.

International law does not dictate US immigration or asylum laws.

 

And the people who aren't apprehended are at the highest level in history.

 

Obviously not, because illegal border crossings are at an all time high.

 

AND among the people who are apprehended, those released into the interior of the US are at the highest level in history.

 

Those apprehended and released to whereabouts unknown is at the highest level in history as well. Liberals don’t want to discuss the facts and the demonstrated failures of the current administration.

 

So you can’t explain what laws aren’t being enforced and are reduced to
“Biden bad”, durp, durp.

Ok, we understand.

 

Oh, you don't know what law I'm referencing?

Why didn't you just say that...

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/...1) enters,or misleading representation or the

 

Gosh, sounds like you have a complaint against USCIS and Homeland Security.

You should really get down to the Inspector General’s office and file a complaint , backed up with your EVIDENCE.

You be sure to let me know how that works out.

 

And who's Homeland Security's boss?...lol

 

Everyone knows that. The question is whether the GOP assfaces are properly funding border issues.

 

It's his fault! And Fauci,too!

 

Show your work.
I posted data. You posted words that made no sense.

 

As are apprehensions.

I see a recurring theme among those claiming laws are not being followed.
That is, NO ONE is stating which laws are not being followed. So the reality must be, laws are being followed and they are not good enough. Congress needs to fix that.

...
How has the level of U.S. asylum claims changed over time?

Daily News Brief

A summary of global news developments with CFR analysis delivered to your inbox each morning. Weekdays.

">View all newsletters >
Prior to the passage of the Refugee Act of 1980, the U.S. government granted asylum on an ad hoc basis, including in the aftermath of World War II and during the Cold War, though at times it refused asylum to certain immigrant groups. The 1980 law created the current statutory basis for asylum, guaranteeing family reunification rights and providing asylees, or migrants who receive asylum, with a path to permanent residency after one year.
https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/seeking-protection-how-us-asylum-process-works

 

LOL. You still making that baseless claim?
When you post data to support your claim?

Facts can't be discussed until you or someone presents some facts.

 

According to that law, Imprisonment and/or fines is all the penalty for illegal entry.

We need more prisons and judges then to handle the work load and space of confinement.
Something only Congress can authorize.

 

I have not made any baseless claims. You don’tt want to address the issue factually because you can’t defend the position your side is taking on this.

 

I have nothing to defend. I just posted statistics. You made up some baseless claim, I call it baseless because you won't provide any data.

US border apprehensions (usafacts.org)

 

Here is your baseless claim. It's baseless because you haven't provided any data, credible or otherwise.

 

It was completely accurate. Maybe you’re unaware of current events?

 

Many on the left are completely unaware of the situation on the southern border and the magnitude of this flood of illegal immigration. They are unaware because their preferred liberal media source mostly ignores this issue or downplays it as being a minor thing.

 

Isn't part of a deal supposed to be attractive? "Let us rape you or we will NOT rob you blind and send your money all over the planet while endangering your lives." Mhhmmm. Fine. Don't pass this treacherous betrayal.

 

Many on the right are just repeating baseless lies because it’s an election year.

 

I am aware you've not provided anything but an opinion. I prefer to see data.
You can't provide data to your opinion. So, it's not worth much.
If the events are so current, it should be easy for you to show your work.

 

Many on the left are just denying the truth because it’s an election year.