"Walking Guns" Programs Started Under Bush!

So you contend that Obama isn't smart enough or is too disinterested to put a stop to that sort of thing? I thought he was all about hope and change. I certainly had much higher hopes for him. I expected McCain to be Bush III were he elected, but it turns out that Obama has done a fine job of living up to that title.

 

Typical does describe it to a tea doesn't it.

Pathetic watching them continue to lie just to try and save Obama's sorry ass.

And of course shirk personal responsibility on Obama's part. Libs can't stomach that.

 

You mean "Operation Wide Receiver"? Dodge and weave and cries of mercy!

Oh, the wailing and nashing of teeth!

All because I asked you prove your lies.

Cry your little heart out my defeated.

 

Wide Receiver killed no federal agents, Fast and Furious did... try again... Your failure rate is getting to be embarrassing, fortunately I don't keep tabs...

 

wonder why you use one idiot as the basis by which to measure another idiot ?

 

Actually it is Bush IV, as Clinton was really Bush II.

 

Oh hey, It's the coward who ran away from me in our last debate about Hearsay.

You never did your homework assignment. That's the quickest way to stay lazy and stupid.

 

Still waiting on you to prove you're not a liar.

Keep deflecting all you like. My thread will just grow and grow.

 

Your simplistic and juvenile threads grow because you are simply that pathetic, its fun to smash on you. Bring facts son or go away.... I'm guessing you will go away...

 

You got called out. And now you got nothing. Check my sig son.

 

Yeah, you got nothing... Wow, big surprise...

 

This thread has gotten a bit off topic so I'm gonna go ahead and re-post the OP since nobody has disproved it.

http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world...a-1194310.html

 

why do you insist on comparing one idiot to another ?

 

So you'll ask stupid questions.

 

seems you took care of that.
Seems you don't have the insight to figure out that both tools work for the same handlers.

 

Might as well be Imperial President #26 (Obama is #2

 

I see that it is still not a current event... but really are you that sad??? Could you be so pathetic??? I guess forum rules don't matter, but really??? I guess I do get it, your whacked lib mods, don't give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about the rules either, that's been apparent for months now, Euro-trash only respond positively when it comes to full support of their failed ideology, or that Aussie thrash that simply has never even shown a mind or common sense, so it doesn't matter...

 

See post #142.

 

the "I think" was your first mistake.

 

I know you are but what am I?

 

Why? You have proven time and again you are irrelevant... I fail to see real argument, I see only trash and failed rhetoric.

 

Since you continually fail to address the topic of this thread and simply want to engage in personal attacks there's really no reason to address you any further. When you can actually post something on point I will respond to you. I encourage the moderators to delete all personal attacks that are not on topic.

 

I have read the responses from the others on your pathetically failed attempt to justify the death of 2 Americans going back to some irrelevant operation when Bush was president. Thing is slick, Obama is not the one getting beat up on this as much as the lying POS Holder is. Protecting Holder will be the death of his presidency, so yes, I say keep it up Mr Prez.

SB1070? The fat lady hasn't sung yet sonny, I believe the supremes will be taking it up come next June, and we all know the balance of power on that play ground.

 

I addressed the topic.
You put forth the tried and true juvenile defense tactic of "He did it first", for which all of our mommies, many years ago, told us was intellectually void and invalidated our argument.
Go back to sleep and pretend your guy is different.