"Walking Guns" Programs Started Under Bush!

The topic of this thread is - "Bush did it so Barry wanted to do it too.". That tact is pretty foolish since the liberal horde hates everything that Bush ever did in his life.

It doesn't make giving guns to Mexican drug gangs no matter who did it or who did it first. What matters is that Holder lied to the Congress under oath. That is what should matter to all of us.

You know; when Scooter was convicted of lying about something that wasn't a crime President Bush refused to pardon him...

Barry on the other hand is standing by Holder in a case related to the deaths of hundreds of Mexican drug criminals - and we know how much the liberal horde likes and depends of drug dealers - and at least one American law enforcement officer.

 

What was the body count from "Wide Receiver?"

Lets say it was 250 instead of zero. How would that makes a body count of even ONE from OBAMA'S "Fast and Furious," acceptable?

If you're so upset about "Wide Receiver," write to your Democrat liberal Congressman and demand that Bush and his people be investaged and prosecuted.

The Republicans, AND THE MAINSTREAM LIBERAL PRESS seem to be doing a better and better job of NAILING Holder, odrama et al. As the investigation of them gains steam each day.

Not my fault that the Democrat sissies in Congress aren't doing or didn't do anything about "Wide Receiver." Shall I remind you that the Democrats held Both Houses of Congress throughout 98% of "Wide Receiver?"

Bush bad, odrama much, much worse. More and more obvious.

 

What was the body count from "Wide Receiver?"

Lets say it was 250 instead of zero. How would that makes a body count of even ONE from OBAMA'S "Fast and Furious," acceptable?

If you're so upset about "Wide Receiver," write to your Democrat liberal Congressman and demand that Bush and his people be investaged and prosecuted.

The Republicans, AND THE MAINSTREAM LIBERAL PRESS seem to be doing a better and better job of NAILING Holder, odrama et al. As the investigation of them gains steam each day.

Not my fault that the Democrat sissies in Congress aren't doing or didn't do anything about "Wide Receiver." Shall I remind you that the Democrats held Both Houses of Congress throughout 98% of "Wide Receiver?"

Bush bad, odrama much, much worse. More and more obvious.

And since you were afraid to look before, here they are again.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFrApLNmjtk&feature=player_embedded"]Smoking Gun: Obama Ordered Operation Fast and Furious - Project Gunrunner - 2009 - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfu1_Scgyow&feature=player_embedded"]Obama Lies 7 Times In Under 2 Minutes! - YouTube[/ame]

One is your utter failure "Annointed One," talking. And you refuse to listen to his lies? What kind of fair weather support do you offer? With friends like you, he still needs an enema.

 

Sorta like the cons blaming a president from 80 yrs ago? FDR!

 

I think alot of americans are upset at our gov'ts incompetance. However, it is the system that produces the incompetance. We all sit here and point fingers at each other, getting a chance to elect another incompetant every election cycle.

We have to change the system and come together as people instead of inbred infighting.

 

Nah, its the nature of govermental bureaucracy. Government rarely does anything well.

 

Are you going to answer my question or not?

 

Who would be the best person to initiate an investigation and prosecution of "Wide Receiver?" Would that be the Attorney General of the United States? A fella by the name of Holder? One wonders why he has not prosecuted anyone for "Wide Receiver." Perhaps you might shed some light on that? Us unenlightened riff raff might think its because he knows there IS NO CASE, but what do we know? Surely the liberals with the bonifide inside track would have some better explanation?

 

Oh yes they have.

However no one from Fast and Furious is even under investigation by the DOJ at this time. Hypocritical bastards.

 

Wide receiver was 500 guns. The Mexican authorities were informed in advance and working in cooperation with US authorities to interdict them. Guns had RFID tags in them. Air surveillance was at the ready when retail purchases were made. Some of the guns were seized on this side of the border. Some were seized by Mexican authorities who had been alerted they were coming across. But a lot of them sliped through surveillance and were lost. Presumably ending up in criminal hands in Mexico. They realized they couldnt reliably track the guns after they were sold, SO THEY ENDED THE PROGRAM.
Fast and furious was 1000s of guns, no RFID tags, no air surveillance, Mexican authorities were not even made aware, seemingly no attempt was even made to follow them. People died.

 

There were 2000 guns in F&F and they lost track of 1400.

 

It's HOW they ran it and then the coverup that is the issue.....let's see if the left holds Holder accountable.....

 

Did the left hold Rangel accountable? How about Maxine Waters? They NEVER hold their own accountable....ever!

 

Yep. Anybody who thinks there's a meaningful difference between Bush and Obama is delusional.

 

That's why I support Herman Cain, at least he is not part of the Washington elite. The incompetence of government is truly exampled in this botched mess, and for anyone to think the government can successfully run a national healthcare program, or really any program, is a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing idiot of the highest degree.

This is exactly the message of the TEA Party, "shrink government, hold politicians accountable, and a balanced budget amendment"! The message of personal responsibility has got to be front and center for the American people if we are to survive as a nation.

 

Anyone who doesn't see the difference between Bush and Obama is blind.

 

There is a very meaningful difference. Bush was bad. b.o. is much, much worse. Easily the worst president in the nations history. b.o. makes Carter look mediocre. [A considerable improvement for Carter]

 

That's what the extremist fringe thinks but the polls show the opposite.
Guess some are just out of touch.

 

Only one poll counts. It will be taken in Nov 2012. b.o. will lose. Probably by a large margin, but that doesn't matter.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html

That is the average of all major polls. b.o. gets 44.1% approval and 51.4% DISAPPROVAL. That is a NEGATIVE 7.3% as of 10/20/2011. Note that Time, AP, NBC, CNN, ABC, and CBS are all included in the averages.

Scroll down to the tracking since he was elected, See if you can discern a trend.

b.o. went NEGATIVE in JULY 2010. After a near straight line drop since taking office. Since then [15 months about half his time in office] he has spiked above negativity 2 times. The first time when he extended the Bush tax cuts, the second time when he had OBL murdered.

So if he extends BUSH'S tax cuts some more and can find someone else to murder, he might get another TEMPORARY bump up.

You should feel so proud.

 

Problem is, the only people polling worse than Obama are Republicans.

See you in 2012!

P.S. Don't forget to follow the money.