FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million

FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million



Yet the mainstream media took no notice of last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 presidential election in violation of federal campaign-finance law.

That lawsuit, filed last week in a DC district court, summarizes the DNC-Clinton conspiracy and provides detailed evidence from Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits.

From Bundling To Money Laundering
Dan Backer, a campaign-finance lawyer and attorney-of-record in the lawsuit, explained the underlying law in an article for Investor’s Business Daily: Under federal law, “an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party’s main account. These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of those contribution limits—it’s legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit for any one recipient. And state parties can make unlimited transfer to their national party.”

This legal loophole allows “bundlers” to raise large sums of money from wealthy donors—more than $400,000 at a time—filtering the funds to the national committees. Democrats and Republicans alike exploit this tactic. But once the money reaches the national committees, other limits apply.

Suspecting the DNC had exceeded those limits, a client of Backer’s, the Committee to Defend the President, began reviewing FEC filings to determine whether there was excessive coordination between the DNC and Clinton. What Backer discovered, as he explained in an interview, was much worse. There was “extensive evidence in the Democrats’ own FEC reports, when coupled with their own public statements that demonstrated massive straw man contributions papered through the state parties, to the DNC, and then directly to Clinton’s campaign—in clear violation of federal campaign-finance law.”

................Much More at the Link...............

Looks like Hillary was violating the law to line her pockets with illegal donations....

Dinesh D'souza got the book thrown at him for his minor violation of campaign finance laws, in comparison......

Will hillary get away with it again, cause shes white?

probably......

What do you think?

 

Trump and Clinton are both toxic and corrupt. The Republican and Democrat parties both are corrupt. We really need a third party.

 

If Trump was corrupt Mueller and the hateful media would have exposed and reported it non stop. Clinton's corruption has been exposed but the left ignores it.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...butions/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.411fd404eeba
use incognito mode (or inprivate for Edge users) to get passed the paywall

Here is the wiki for that SC decision referenced
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCutcheon_v._FEC

Seems like the Republicans attempt to get donation limits removed created a loophole that Hillary and Co jumped through.

Way to go McCutcheon lol.

 

Sounds like the Chinese money scandal of the Bill Clinton campaign. Some things never change.

 

This is almost certainly bogus. It doesn't even make sense (but few Trumpster memes do anymore, paranoia is their main ingredient).

This is an attack group. They're almost certainly staging this to fundraise off of.

 

What's really ironic about it is seeing Alito's question. "How realistic is that". Very, in fact. That's exactly what Hot Tub Tommy DeLay was indicted for doing!!!!!!!

 

That is a BOMBSHELL!!!!

Let me guess, there has been little to no TV coverage by: ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, and the NY Times and WAPO have buried this information?

Hillary is a bitter lying thieving crook... and Leftists worship her.

 

+1

 

Of course it is. This article is from April where the Trumpets filed suit against the FEC because they were ignored. The case will be dismissed any day now...

 

It's a good thing she's a democrat or she'd be in a shitload of trouble.

 

Careful..... those could be viewed as some famous last words right there.

 

No we don't.
What we need is to stop allowing the media to control how and what we think, and vote out corruption in the two parties that exist.
But we won't do that. Instead, we keep re-electing the same corrupt string puppets, completely ignoring the malignant corruption within our OWN parties while constantly railing on about the other party.
All a third party will do is create a sudo party of one of the two. Tea party winners is a good example. They disappeared without fanfare simply melting into the GOP after the first year or two.
A leftist third party would do the same. It would be out gunned by the Democrats and eventually vote right down the party line with Democrats.
The only people who can change a political party is members of that party being critical of their own.
But again, we are so divided and pretty much 100% ignore the glaring problems within our own party while screaming our heads off by every superficial nonsense we manage to nit pick about the other.

True that.

 

Leftists supported Bernie. If they had come out and voted for Clinton, she would have easily won. Clinton was a Bush style neoCON. Now she's old news. Why are you guys so obcessed with the old bag.

 

I call bullshit. (leftist supported Bernie)
Sanders stood for everything the left wants, while Clinton is barely liked by her own.
Yet... she won the primary. I'll say that again, Bernie truly spoke for the things Democrats say they want.... Hillary is a known crook, not even well liked by her own.... yet...she beat Bernie.
And what the DNC did to Bernie, something everyone could see, and how the media treated Sanders...again everyone could see it - yet where was the outrage? Sure his primary supporters were very vocal about how poorly he was treated...but mainstream Democrats supported Hillary. One of the most connected corporatist politicians in the nation.
And, she is still popular.

 

This is unreal , i swear if these criminals are not brought up on charges why the hell should anyone obey the law. And you dems dare say trump is a criminal . Every single thing dems touch they corrupt .. is there one thing that isnt? Wow!

 

Clinton is not a leftist so I wonder why so many ignorant Trumpists keep saying that. She is a moderate Democrat and her politics are closer to Bush than Sanders. Hillary is only known as a crook to imbeciles who bought into the National Enquirer, Sean Hannity and blowhard Trump's campaign speil. She has been heavily investigated since '93 and no arrests let alone convictions even though she is one of the most hated politicians in history. You are just parroting lying scumbags like Hannity and Trump and have shown that you know little or nothing about US politics in general. You are not breaking any new ground here champ. And yes, you are what you seem, another dittohead singing in the clown chorus.

 

I think you lie like D'souza does.

 

only $84 million? That lying b*tch should be in jail.

 

MSNBC had other things to cover:

Nicolle Wallace indulges in violent anti-Trump fantasies on MSNBC air

Crazy talk, deeply antagonistic to the ideals of a constitutional republic, that should, but won't, be a career-ender.

 

Tom Delay was indicted by a liberal activist DA and found not guilty by the Courts, falsely accusing people and using the executive as a political weapon is common for the left

 

Fox News isn't covering it. It was a blip last year.

 

http://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/feclawsuit.pdf

Ooops. Always best to check things before consuming shoe leather.

 

Last year? Thursday, Silly!

Here is what Wallace suggested Thursday:

MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace says she encouraged Jeb Bush to physically attack Donald Trump: "I told Jeb Bush after that debate that I thought he should have punched [Trump] in the face."

Wallace says Bush would have been "a hero" if he would have violently attacked Trump. pic.twitter.com/VT7aBWJTMq​

— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) October 11, 2018
This is crazy talk, deeply antagonistic to the ideals of a constitutional republic. These outbursts should, but won't, be career-enders.

 

Hillary for prison?