A military operation in iran is urgently needed

This is all I want to tell you on here.
The iranians approach a nuclear facility which is a visual hazard to the jews.
it's the right time for an action-great timing for obama to attain the jewish voice for the upcoming elections.
The best way of attacking is a wide use of collabration between the american and jewish air-forces,along with each other,the attack would be successful and lethal.
Israel is already ready for batches of missles and the protection system is stronger than ever,so why do we linger on something so critical ?
we must stop the iranians from a nuclear bomb,a nuclear facility of iran directly means a change in the regional balance that is satisfactory so far
There are also proofs that the nuclear facility is going to be used as a deterent weapon on the americans and the israelies.
The concerns don't stop bothering me ! the iranian elaboration grows up amazingly every single moment and this advancement also consists of a solid protection for machines and the substances-one part of the nuclear program intends to conceal the machines as deep as possible to make it impossible for the american and the israeli to totally destroy the nuclear centers.
The embargo doesn't work at all because it doesn't influence the iranian main bank,furthermore the iranians dictate a pace to the world by closing down strategic ports where an uncountable amount of oil barrels pass off-it's capable of absolutely paralyzing the entire world,we need to avoid their financial contribution as much as possible in order to deeply devastate their economical vigor which genuinely has a considerable impact on the worldwide mark.To my mind,This is the right time to break down the world-wide relations with iran and if it doesn't work out,an exstensive military operation should fill in the missing work.

Let's politely discuss this major matter that has probably caught everybody's eye recently.

 

Oh, yeah, and there is talk of reducing the USA military budget, too!

Gotta stop THAT kind of talk with a war!

 

It's not October yet.

 

Obama will get Americans killed in Iran. Oppose Obama every where on every issue. ******* his soul to hell.

 

Sigh.

Why should we help you guys when all you'll do is blame and criticize us like you guys blame us for Iraq?

We are not the world's police, and we really shouldn't help people who'll just be hostile to us anyway.

Everytime were called in you guys hate us and call us murderers and Imperialists and all sorts of junk.

 

You are indeed correct, Albert Di Salvo.

I could not agree more!

 

This + 15.24 trillion debt = Big No no. Also, we should not be getting US soldiers killed in issues like these. We went into Iraq and Afghanistan as a counter-terrorist action because of 9-11 (which I fully support), but I believe we were in there too long and is was too costly in life and money. We cannot be getting ourselves into situations like these over and over again. Every country makes mistakes, but we need to rise above and learn from ours.

 

Hey guys, I dont like the president either, and I (*)(*)(*)(*) sure hope hes a one term president. No need to hate on him. However, he is the president we elected to serve us, and we need to deal with our decisions until the next election, because he is our leader right now (again, the one we freely elected) and theres nothing we can do about it except hope he makes the best choices he can until the next election.

 

We will eventually have to nuke Iran.

We might as well get it over with and do it now.

 

That was probably THE most ignorant post I have ever read on any forum board I have visited.

 

That is insane. Why should we start a war we can't afford, just to give the Israelis cover for their regional aggression?

Ok? They want to use nuclear weapons as a deterrent to keep other countries from doing exactly what you're proposing those countries ought to do. So what? What's the threat here? The horrible threat that they might be able to dissuade Israel or the United States from attacking them?

So, you think that by attacking them and destroying their nuclear facility, they become less likely to close off the strait? What sense does that make. If we want to keep the strait open, attacking them is just about the worst thing we could do.

 

In my opinion tough sanctions are the only way with Iran (I admire what the Obama Administration has done so far even though I DO NOT support Obama)

 

Says the man who has never lived in a country that has been ravished by bombs dropped from the sky and has no idea what it is like to be on the receiving end.
You wouldn't be so cocksure otherwise. Plus that deluded American notion that it can never happen to you.

 

New York City and Washington, DC are inevitably going to be nuked by terrorists or covert action from foreign powers. Canada will be the only safe place for Americans.

 

It doesnt matter whether we are the worlds police or not, letting Iran have nuclear power enables them to build nukes, which is a direct security threat to America.

 

Boy, dittohead neocons are fear mongered half to death. Is this the Ugly 'Merican Jingo thread? There is no evidence Iran is actually trying to make nukes, and they haven't attacked anyone since Cyrus the Great or something. Change the channel. You can see why Pubs shouldn't be allowed near power....Pub Dupes....

 

The American left is the only direct security threat to America.

 

That is also true, but two different threat types, Iran's threat type is strictly war, the lefts threat type is strictly stupid.

 

We've had more than enough war in the last decade, thank you very much.

Iran should be watched, but not much more than that.

 

How? They're not suicidal.

No, overreaching government is -- whether it's from the left or the right.

 

Assuming an attack happened and war broke out, it wouldn't be a hard task to sink the handful of rafts Iran calls a navy and hold the door open for all the oil tankers that want through.

 

I dont see why you want to do this, if it can be done peacefully then it SHOULD be done peacefully.

 

If that's true, then what's the big deal about them having nukes?

There seems to be a general consensus that Iran would be crushed by us conventionally, but when the topic of them having nukes comes up, everyone goes paranoid.

Pakistan already has nukes and has a less stable government than Iran. No one's pushing to invade them.

Iran wants nukes for defense, not offense, and at this point, I can't blame them.

If Saddam had gotten nukes, we wouldn't have invaded Iraq.

 

The Doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction is like the Doctrine of Papal Infallibility. We don't know exactly what its parameters are. Nothing is true in all circumstances.

It is inevitable that NYC and Washington, DC will be nuked by covert action. Best case scenario would take at least two years to clearly identify the perpetrator.

 

It worked pretty well during the Cold War.