A Reality Check on Race and IQ

I think Jews sums it up. Obviously that answer can be expanded a lot.

 

So, basically Brachycephalic Jews completely control the minds of Mesocephalic Western Europeans?

Poland was 10% Jewish in the 1930's, and still pulled off a government sponsored anti-Jewish boycott, and effectively barred Jews from holding government positions, and also positions of power.

While Jews have certainly corrupted racial science with the likes of Boas, Gould, Diamond, Lewontin etc.

It seems they couldn't brainwash Western Europeans if they weren't a willing audience.

 

Austria a Brachycephalic nation with a lot of Slavic DNA, nearly voted in Austrian Nationalist Hofer.

That can't just be explained away by environment, or culture, as the Austrians despite their Germanic culture, non-Soviet bloc past, and rich incomes are genetically, and also have poilitical aspirations more like Czech people than like other Germanic's.

Absolutely Mesocephalic Western Europeans seem to be particularly easily brainwashed into Liberalism.

 

No.

Western Europeans are very susceptible to moralistic arguments and guilt tripping. Which, in addition to pseudoscience, is relentless from the Jew owned lying-media. Plus the modern fashionable demonization of the pure-evil "Nazis", who were actually correct about many things. Luckily the internet is waking people up to Jew-led White-genocide.

 

The German philosophers like Kant, Leibniz, and Schopenhauer were all very Brachycephalic, and came from Eastern parts of Germany, with a lot of Slavic mixture.

 

"Moralist" more like "Crocodile Tears"

I proved that anti-racism, and psychopathy go hand, and hand here.

http://www.politicalforum.com/race-relations/459969-anti-racism-symptom-psychopathy.html

Now we're getting some where, to why Western Europeans stood with destroying other races, and now stand with destroying their own race.

 

I'm not sure why you keep going on about cephalic index as if it's a crucial factor. And why talk of "Western Europeans" when Nord/Alpine/Med is a more informative division. Nords are more prone to moralistic arguments. They are actually the least racist people ironically. Try brainwashing a chimpanzee into liberalism. Lol, just an example, not saying non-Nords are chimps.

Kevin MacDonald writes about European/Semite differences. I think the Nord is the extreme European type.

http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/understandji-1.htm

 

Oh right, Western Europeans "destroyed other races". They are uniquely guilty. I am so happy they are being wiped out, and it's all their own fault.

How pathetic.

- - - Updated - - -

Can you reference this? Lol, you are a brachycephalic supremacist?

 

Morality, and racism seem to be mainly derived from having high levels of Oxytocin.

Redheads have less Oxytocin, Western Europeans have way, way more Redhead genes than Eastern Europeans.

You can see where that goes real quick.

 

One can imagine the shock an intelligent German reader suffered when he remembered that many of the great German heroes from Bismarck down to Hindenburg and Hitler were brachycephalics and even hyperbrachycephalics, and that the three greatest philosophers Germany has produced-Leibniz, Kant, and Schopenhauer-had round heads in the most extreme form (Fig. 2, No. 4, Leibniz, skull index 90.3[!]; NO. 5, Kant, skull index 88.5; No. 6, Schopenhauer, head index 90.0 [!).

http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2004/08/german-hyperbrachycephals.html

 

Variation in "morality" (please define) and "racism" (please define) is mainly caused by variation in oxytocin? Fascinating. I'm looking forward to seeing the data. Variation in oxytocin is established by "proportion of redheads"? Great, I'm assuming you intend to publish this carefully reasoned thesis?

 

Larger brains tend to be rounder in dolichocephalic races. You're confounding brain size variation within races with cephalic index between races. In a nutshell large round brains vs small round brains.

http://dienekes.blogspot.co.uk/2004/08/german-hyperbrachycephals.html

Cranial size and shape
S. P. Pickering (Correlation of brain and head measurements, and relation of brain shape and size to shape and size of the head, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Volume 15, Issue 1, Date: October/December 1930, Pages: 1-52):
It is general knowledge that an increase in brain size runs parallel with an increase in head size and with a change from dolichocephaly to brachycephaly as we ascend the scale from the anthropoids to modern man. This appears primarily to be a volume phenomenon.
A. Thomson (quoted in the above paper) notes that:
Given a cavity of oval or ellptical form with elastic walls, the more its contents are increased the greater will be the tendency to assume a spherical shape.
Pickering studied cadavers and their weight and volume directly, rather than relying on estimations from cephalic measurements:
The specimens used in this work gave an average capacity for dolichocephalic skulls of 1402.8 cc.; for mesocephalic, 1474.8 and for brachycephalic, 1520.6 cc.

The same tendency was shown in the size of the brains. The average size of the brains in this series was for the dolichocephalic heads, 1135.4 cc.; for the mesocephalic, 1144.2 cc., and for the brachycephalic, 1180.7 cc.

The figures show a marked increase from the dolichocephalic to the brachycephalic type. Though the number of specimens of the dolichocephalic type is not sufficient to be conclusive proof, the fact that brachycephaly runs parallel with an increase in brain and head size is very evident.
Interestingly, according to K. Beals et al. (Brain size, cranial morphology, climate, and time machines. Current Anthropology, 25, 301-330. ) there is a +0.37 correlation between cranial capacity and the cephalic index, i.e., broader-headed, more brachycephalic populations also have bigger cranial capacities.

Why are brachycephalic heads more capacious? I don't think that anyone has discovered the exact reasons why this is the case, but here is my theory:

In general, human heads are longer than they are broad, and broader than they are high. Heads of course, like any other organ, are expensive things (developmentally), and this is particularly the case for humans where the head forms a substantially larger part of the body than in other mammals.

During human evolution, cranial capacity has increased. Cranial capacity is of course correlated with gross size: bigger people have a bigger cranial cavity, and a bigger brain.

However, things are not that simple. It can be easily proven that different shapes with the same surface area have a different capacity. In two dimensions, ellipses and ovals have a smaller capacity than round shapes with the same perimeter.

Thus, a broad head achieves a greater volume than a long one of equal surface. Since surface corresponds to bone mass, which corresponds to developmental cost, it is possible that a rounder head shape is more economical: it achieves the same volume with smaller cost.

The same is also true for the height of the skull. Since skulls tend to be broader than they are high, a skull that expands on the vertical plane will tend to approach a more spherical shape.

It is thus not surprising that according to Lahr and Wright's useful definition:
...it is generally agreed that a modern skull should present a relatively small face tucked under the vault that is relatively short and high, a relatively vertical forehead, parietal enlargement, a relatively rounded occiput, a flexed cranial base, a canine fossa, an occipital protuberance in the occipital bone and mental eminence or chin. Most descriptions of modern H. sapiens would also include skeletal gracility as characterizing the group.
or that according to K. L. Beals (Climate and the evolution of brachycephalization, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Volume 62, Issue 4, Date: December 1983, Pages: 425-437):
During the Holocene, the [cranial] index increases under all climatic conditions.

...

Turning to the Pleistocene, the mean hominid cranial index has increased 9 units.
Hopefully, a new generation of scientists will overcome the knee-jerk reaction against studying cranial variation and cognitive function, perhaps by relying on cranial models built with 3D digitizers rather than the older methods based on lengths, arcs, and indices.

 

Redheads have reduced levels of Eumelanin compared to the rest of the population. But because of correlates in cell biology, reduced levels of Eumelanin may be accompanied by comparably reduced levels of Epinephrine (Adrenalin), Dopamine, Serotonin, and Oxytocin as well.

https://barrykort.wordpress.com/article/all-about-redheads-3iyoslgwsp412-5/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17987115

PLoS One. 2007 Nov 7;2(11):e1128.
Oxytocin increases generosity in humans.
Zak PJ1, Stanton AA, Ahmadi S.
Author information


Abstract
Human beings routinely help strangers at costs to themselves. Sometimes the help offered is generous-offering more than the other expects. The proximate mechanisms supporting generosity are not well-understood, but several lines of research suggest a role for empathy. In this study, participants were infused with 40 IU oxytocin (OT) or placebo and engaged in a blinded, one-shot decision on how to split a sum of money with a stranger that could be rejected. Those on OT were 80% more generous than those given a placebo. OT had no effect on a unilateral monetary transfer task dissociating generosity from altruism. OT and altruism together predicted almost half the interpersonal variation in generosity. Notably, OT had twofold larger impact on generosity compared to altruism. This indicates that generosity is associated with both altruism as well as an emotional identification with another person

http://www.columbuscriminaldefensef...ne/oxytocin-we-need-to-pay-attention-to-this/

Recent studies on oxytocin have made it more and more relevant to crime. The hormone oxytocin, also known as the "love hormone," is usually recognized for its role in sexual reproduction, more specifically its pain killing side affects in women before and after childbirth. However, more recently this hormone is being recognized for its relevance in certain behaviors, such as social recognition, anxiety, and pair bonding. When a person is unable to secrete oxytocin, he or she is far more likely to display sociopathic, psychopathic, and/or narcissistic tendencies. Persons unable to produce oxytocin are also likely to show manipulative behavior.

Oxytocin May Intensify Orgasms and Racism?
By Diana Herst on April 5, 20141 Comment




http://guardianlv.com/2014/04/oxytocin-may-intensify-orgasms-and-racism/


Two separate studies reveal new discoveries about oxytocin, also known as the “love hormone.” Researchers from the Hannover Medical School in Germany say the hormone may intensify orgasms, but researchers from the University in Amsterdam in The Netherlands say it could also increase racism, making people love only those who are in their in-group.
In the study from Professor of Psychology Carsten de Dreu of the University of Amsterdam, researchers looked at males who were told to choose five out of six people who would gain access to a life-saving boat. The men, who were given oxytocin, were more likely to reject those who they did not feel familiar with, selecting only people from their in-group. Men, who were given a placebo, seemed to be more willing to randomly select people to hop on the imaginary life-saving boat.
De Dreu says, “Oxytocin increases in-group favoritism and derogation of others. It may also lead to emerging intergroup conflicts and violence.”
Another study from researchers of the Hannover Medical School in Germany says that oxytocin may not only increase racism

 

So, basically modern Humans are more Brachycephalic, than their more primitive counterparts?

Fascinating.

 

You're making giant leaps unsupported by data.
Oxytocin affects racism and altruism > Oxytocin explains all variation in racism and altruism.
Redheads have variant levels of Oxytocin > Oxytocin can be entirely gauged by proportion of redheads
And then racism and altruism aren't covariant?

Your thesis has very little supporting it.

 

No, but Oxytocin seems to be the most conclusive factor involved in racism, and altruism, the 2nd factor is the Amygdala which is also seen similarly which a bigger Amygdala si also involved in racism, and altruism.

 

It seems you want to just look at that one variable in isolation to promote Slavs. Kind of desperate.

Try looking at how brain size, cephalic index and IQ vary all at the same time from race to race and get back to me. A large dolichocephalic brain is probably more powerful than a small brachycephalic brain. Size is the key variable here. Brains tend to become brachycephalic as they increase in size, within and between races. It's possible to have large dolichocephalic brains and very large brachycephalic brains in one races, versus small to large brachycephalic brains in another. You are looking at a secondary variable, which you choose because it is found in your people. Advocacy, not science.

- - - Updated - - -

Well feel free to present data to support your claims.

 

Brachycephalic brains are not just bigger, they're more modern.

Brachycephalic brains are wider, and flat in the rear.

Human brains have become wider, and flattened in the rear for generations.
(Except not really in Africans, and Australoids)

Keep in mind the rear brain is more primitive, and is mostly based on sight.

 

Research very strongly supports that Oxytocin promotes altruism, morality, social bonding, and also racism.

 

0.1%? ....

 

That's a tendency. You don't seem to be getting this. It's possible for a dolichocephalic brain to be larger. Don't you see that a small brachycephalic brain could increase in size by becoming more dolichocephalic? You're making a hasty generalization. Check brain size, shape and IQ correlations within and between populations. Stop repeating yourself.

 

If 2 brains are the same size one is Dolichocephalic, and another one is Brachycephalic, the Brachycephalic brain will have much more volume in the front, and much less volume in the rear.

 

The opposite appears true.



All of your speculation is useless without population specific data.

 

Your image clearly shows a wider front of the skull in the brachycephalic brain.

Your imagine clearly also shows a longer rear of the skull in the dolichocephalic brain.

The rear brain is more primitive mostly based on sight, while it's the frontal brain where more complexity of thought happens.

 

You said, and I quote.

"the Brachycephalic brain will have much more volume in the front, and much less volume in the rear."

I don't even know why you are going on about this. You are generalizing from insufficient variables and no data.