A straightforward question: Why do some of you think Trump is not "legitimate"?

I've proven it over and over; http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-gops-stealth-war-against-voters-w435890

You just don't understand evidence when you read it. That's on you. I provide it, and you fail to debunk it. And that's how it roles with you.

- - - Updated - - -

Lol! You can't figure it out either, can you?

 

So what you going to do about it ? Nothing? That's what.

 

None of this proves your claims - you simply parrot the claims your "source" makes without providing any proof.

- - - Updated - - -

Hardly - I am fully aware of the lock-step nature of those on the left.

 

His home boy Kris Kobach started cross check in 28 Republican states with 7.2 million potential illegally purged voters that he got caught lying about; http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-gops-stealth-war-against-voters-w435890

http://www.gregpalast.com/ethnic-vo...lp-fix-us-election-trump-reveals-greg-palast/

 

He has mostly winning states AND then electrol points unlucky was Al Gores dreams over and Bush Jr won with five point marginal in electrol points year 2000.

 

So you support cheating while knowing your candidate really didn't win? If you do, you are what's wrong with this country. A country that abandons rules and laws is a decaying society. Congratulations! You elected a guy with the momentum to finish the job. And what do you get out of it exactly?

 

It does not not matter how man time you repeat this falsehood - it will never be true.

 

He is totally legitimate and more so than Obama ever was. For one thing, Trump was born in the USA, and nobody can even offer any proof otherwise. Theres lots of proof that Obama was not a citizen of this country but he was elected any way because he was black. Might as well just tell the truth one more time.

 

Well, whatever----Just glad you don't want to start an argument about Women's Intuitions---I would then say,go ask your mother first off what she thinks about those intuitions & then ask every woman you know--Every single one of them has a story I'm willing to bet & every single one of them will say, hard to explain the feeling, but,it's there & I know somethings wrong---- I will state right now, right here ---In my 61 years of living I have "not" been wrong once on these intuitions-----I'm on my 4th bottle of tums as this feeling hit election night & will not go away,-----I've tried to reconcile it has sour grapes,I've tried to convince myself that perhaps the numbers could be wrong,I've had numerous conversations with my sensible journalist husband, but he also has learned over 31 years of marriage not to argue with these intuitions----it's just sometimes one doesn't need concrete difinitve proof---You just know--
So,belittle me, laugh at me,keep posting how absurd you think my reasoning is----I get it---But,people will tell you--- "there is something to be said about a Women's Intuition"-----

 

Oh it's true alright. Closing 868 polling stations is all the evidence anyone would ever need that says the election was stolen. The evidence is everywhere, and you are officially in denial; http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/4/13501120/vote-polling-places-election-2016 You go and close down that many polling stations in key minority areas, that proves with 100% accuracy that the election was stolen. For anyone to not see that evidence, has to be high on drugs.

 

In fact, however, it proves nothing as you can not in any way prove motive or effect.
You're long om claims and bupkus on proof.

 

-------OMG------

 

No, I just proved it mathematically. I have no need to prove motive or effect. Statistically closing down 868 polling places across a half a dozen southern states, is simply too easy to calculate and confirm. The election was stolen based on these polling station closures. And there is nothing you can say or link disputing my claim. It is what it is.

 

Jill Stein isn't getting sworn in tomorrow…

 

Your source does no such thing.

For you claim the election was stolen to have any credibility whatsoever, you must show that actions were taken to generate that effect and those actions actually achieved the effect intended.
So, yes you do.

You know, of course, that you cannot, which is why you will refuse to do so.

 

Trump is the winner of the 2016 Presidential Election. To pretend otherwise is delusional.

 

And the folks with all these polling station closures never got the chance to vote either; http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/4/13501120/vote-polling-places-election-2016 Sort of canceled out any chances of a free and fair election.

 

You cannot prove this.

 

Where is the evidence that prevented people from voting on a systemic level?

 

Stole the election. He didn't win the election. There is a big difference.

 

You cannot prove this.

 

I repeat, where is the evidence that such actions, any actions at all, prevented citizens from voting one a systemic level?

 

The math proves it. Most of these states are majority black or Hispanic. That said, taking down 868 polling stations in mostly minority areas in the south reduces those minorities chances of voting way more than whites. It's just a matter of simple logic. I know you can't take any degree of logic here, but you will never prove me wrong on this. You simply have no argument other than to say you can't prove it. Sorry, I just did.

 

Closures of 868 polling stations is pretty easy math using a formula of logical deductive reasoning. You don't close that many stations down without having a huge impact on the election. Trump stole the election. It's simple math.