A well regulated militia.

So the answer to my question is no justices believe that there can be no federal gun control laws (despite what your SUSPICIONS are). The constitution must be interpreted for modern times. The founders had no way to know the power of the weapons we have today.

- - - Updated - - -

Ok so none as I suspected. You are a danger to your community

 

Did you know that you are more likely to get struck by lightning than shot by a law abiding gun owner? Yup!

I wonder if liberals cower in fear whenever there is a lightning storm? They certainly would never survive an apocalypse! Lol!

My goodness. I am shocked at the fear I see in these people's posts. Yet at the same time, they will tell us that the police are a bunch of racists who want to kill black people, the same people they want to disarm, and if the liberals have their way, the only people who will have firearms are criminals and cops and government entities. How disgusting. They are pure filth.

- - - Updated - - -

Prove it.

- - - Updated - - -

Prove that I am a "danger to my community." People in THIS country are innocent unless proven guilty. Lol.

 

Liberals would not survive an apocalypse? Would you? Do you know what an apocalypse is? LOL

 

Why do libs have such a poor understanding of laws, etiquette and manners?

- - - Updated - - -

You will be hiding and crying for the police to come and protect your pansy arse. I think you've made that very clear. You will be one of the first to go after voluntarily giving up your rights for government security. Fool.

- - - Updated - - -

Now, let's get back to business. I'm waiting for you to prove the allegations that you have made against me.

 

Happy to. You can not provide evidence that you can safely load, store, clean, carry, clear a misjamb, or fire your very deadly weapon.

- - - Updated - - -

Did you say etiquette and manners? Now that is hilarious!

 

I wonder if liberals think guns will just magically go "poof!" and disappear someday? What idiots they must be to not realize that you cannot put Pandora back in the box. SOME people are always going to be armed, and those people are the criminal element of society.

Just like your war on drugs and alcohol was a complete and utter failure, so will your war on guns be a failure.

- - - Updated - - -

I did. Now where is your proof that I am a dangerous person?

- - - Updated - - -

I don't have to provide any evidence to you about anything. That doesn't in any way prove your allegations that I am dangerous.

 

Well that's good because you can't. And that needs to change and those laws would be completely constitutional

 

What laws? Laws that would only prevent law abiding people from owning weapons?

 

Just as a reminder to readers, keep this poster's comments to me (about my appearance, etc) the next time he says something about Donald Trump disrespecting women. REMEMBER this thread. In fact, I will quote from it the next time he says something about Donald Trump being "disrespectful" to women. Lol.

Edit: I mean "she." No way would a real man be this catty and exhibit such jealousy towards a female, I hope.

 

It is up to the individuals to decide how/where they want to get their firearm training. You can't order people to join and/or get training from a militia.

 

Okay, I was rude too. For that I apologize, but I really do hate and have no respect for people who want to take away or limit my rights as an American citizen. They are worthy of nothing but contempt, IMO. And I am NOT a republican. I am a centrist.

 

To quote Kenny Rogers, "You've got to know when to hold them, and know when to fold them".

Time to fold 'em.

There are a lot of people you just can't have a conversation with. Being able to figure out who those people are is really easy. Stepping away is oftentimes the hard part, but if you can't, then you're just wasting even more time than you've already wasted.

 

Well geez, she starts off with saying she's "reporting" people, so I called her a wimp (I mean, that IS pretty wimpy), and then she immediately starts in attacking my appearance and saying that I am dangerous to my community. WTF? It's me too. I just cannot STAND people who want to take my rights away from me when I have never harmed another person in my life!

 

I know it's hard, but you just can't go that route. Yes, democrats will lie, they will cheat, they will steal. They really truly don't care about anything except getting their politicians in office so that rights can be taken away.

They are statists, which means that they are lemmings. Any lemming not following their head lemming just needs to be convinced that the head lemming is the boss, and why doesn't everybody else understand this?

When you have a group of people demanding that loans taken out in order to go to college shouldn't be paid back because they think they shouldn't have to pay their own loans off, you know you are dealing with people who have no morals.

Just let it go. They aren't worth it.

 

Makes perfect sense. The Second Amendment is basically a reminder "remember to give the Militia their guns!"

Hillary dishonest, soulless, big-state progressive and she lies, about everything. Last night she pretended to believe that Americans have an individual right to bear arms, if elected, she will drop those faster than Bill's dirty underwear that she took a $7.50 deduction for when she donated them to charity. Seriously folks, she donates used underwear to charity? Who does that?

But remember, this horrible woman's henchmen working with the State Department and the FBI wanted the FBI to declassify a Hillary Clinton e-mail and State would give the FBI more slots in overseas stations. A “quid pro quo,” the dividing line between acceptable and unacceptable corruption.

Real scum these folks.

Qatar, one of the worst actors in the Middle East, supports Hillary's Islamic State Pals and offered $1 million as a “birthday” gift to Bill Clinton in return for five minutes of his time. Who offers — who takes — $200,000 a minute? We don’t know the “quid” here, but it’s got to be big.

Clinton, the scumbag, ran and hid when asked about pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation. And for good reason. The e-mails reveal how foundation donors were first in line for favors and contracts.

A governance review by an outside law firm reported that some donors “may have an expectation of quid pro quo benefits in return for gifts.” You think? Your Sultanic heart bleeds for Haiti, but rather than give to Haiti directly, you give through the Clintons, obtaining a claim on future favors.

Her soulless campaign — all ambition and entitlement — emerges in the e-mails, as aides keep asking what the campaign is about. Clinton complains that her speechwriters have not given her any overall theme or rationale. Isn’t that her job? Her aides, Joel Benenson: “Do we have any sense from her what she believes or wants her core message to be?” Nope.

Every policy and position is negotiable and politically calculable. Her embarrassing about-face on the Trans-Pacific Partnership after the popular winds swung decisively against free trade, without batting an eye.

The financial regulation in Dodd-Frank. As she told a Goldman Sachs gathering, after the financial collapse there was “a need to do something because, for political reasons . . . you can’t sit idly by and do nothing.”

Scum.

 

I've always felt that the best example of good gun control is hitting what you are aiming at.

 

Yes it does exist.

 

You have lost that argument many times.

Your interpretation is exactly that an interpretation which must insert words in the second amendment which are not there.

The second amendment applies to individuals case closed

 

Of course, there's no reason we cannot continue the individual right not connected with a militia AND join an active militia.
You just need your state to create one.

 

You are fully aware of the fact that all these statements are false.

 

This is logically, factually and legally incorrect.
You are fully aware of the fact the "militia clause" does not limit the protection afforded to the rights mentioned by the remainder of the amendment.

 

Fortunately the Supreme court disagrees with you

 

The definition of militia is . . .

mi·li·tia
məˈliSHə/Submit
noun
a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.
a military force that engages in rebel or terrorist activities, typically in opposition to a regular army.
all able-bodied civilians eligible by law for military service.

 

Actually you can order training. Nothing unconstitutional about that

- - - Updated - - -

You apologize and then continue to insult. This is hilarious. You know people can read this? LOL

 

So...I can "order" you to have sex with a gay man (assuming you are straight) and there is "nothing unconstitutional about that".

Not sure what you are trying to say.