Discussion in 'Race Relations' started by Libhater, Apr 15, 2016.
Blacks belong in every continent as they are the original inhabitants apart from arctic.
And the 400 years of unpaid Labour.
Should we replace all organisms with single celled amoebae? Evolution is supposed to go forwards.
No they aren't.
- - - Updated - - -
Blacks are still the original inhabitants of every continent .
And segregationists are the lowest form of life - so let's move on.
Yes they are.
- - - Updated - - -
No, those who oppose the world domination of the White race are the enemies of human progress.
no they aren't. You care obviously that's why you made such a pointless claim
You falsely claimed Bantu Negroids were the original inhabitants of every continent, which is irrelevant. When people conquer and dominate, obviously they should exterminate any subraces there. (through legally established means)
Berlin Conference 1884-1885, Europeans deciding how to carve up Africa and this was well after the Atlantic Slave Trade.
You misrepresent what I said. I said they did it to create "buffers."
Anyway here you can start with these:
Silverblatt, Irene (2004). Modern Inquisitions: Peru and the colonial origins of the civilized world. Durham: Duke University Press. p. 115
Smedley, Audrey (1997). RACE - The Power of an Illusion: Origin of the idea of race. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/race/000_About/002_04-background-02-09.htm.
Wade, Lisa (2015). The US Census and the Social Construction of Race. The Society Pages. Retrieved from: https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2015/10/02/the-census-and-the-social-construction-of-race/.
Look up 'invention of the white race' and 'origins of whiteness' if you want more.
What about those who are non-believers of any religion? Quoting biblical passages mean absolutely nothing to them.
Let's see if you're right.
You list everything you have done to further humanity or good you have done for your community and
we will compare it to the accomplishments of individuals from other races. If one of them has
outdone you, we will vote on the value of genocide in that particular case.
So what you are admitting is you are riding the coat-tails of white people who came before you - claiming their
accomplishments as your own. You gave no proof that you are intelligent, ambitious or accomplished.
Why should we let you stay and segregate out people who are more accomplished than yourself just
because you share the same skin tone as others who came before you?
I am not impressed.
Legally established is subjective and you still haven't been able to counter the fact that blacks are the original inhabitants of every continent cuz that's an irreversible fact
- - - Updated - - -
Semites are black
Kostenki Man the 37,000 year old early modern Human of Russia was genetically closest to Lithuanians, not Africans.
Ridiculous, every unique, and diverse Human group should have a right to exist with their own self governance.
You're doing no favors to the nationalist / race realist movement by promoting genocide.
He should continue. Let the world see what White Nationalism/race realism truly represents. He's espousing similar sentiments of those who share his ideology. People have a right to know what's cooking.
At least he's open about his racism and doesn't try to be subtle or feel like he's denial, even if all his talking points are completely full of sht.
I still wanna know how much money he's putting aside to pay for my trip back to Africa since he's so adamant that I belong there.
No, this is where Europeans deciding to colonize and then subjugate the peoples of an entire continent under the impression that they were doing good and they weren't. Keep in mind Africa is also where Europeans got most of their slaves during the slave trade and shipped them to the Americas against their will.
Also, if you're too lazy to Google some of these well known facts then I don't know why you think your fit to debate anything here.
No not all...
Your 'reality' adds nothing to the discussion. It just states that the Portuguese called black-skinned people 'black'. It says nothing about how the term was being used as part of the racial social structure of colonial slavery. Calling everything with a single drop of African blood 'black' is a major deviation of just calling black-skinned people 'black.' I bet you already knew this though.
I'm breeding little beige kids just to confuse the crap out of you.
This was literally the stupidest post I've read on here in a long time...and that's saying a lot.
It is not "acting white" that people expect, acting and dressing like a thug that is about to rob someone should be frowned upon.
Probably the same number that walk through predominately white meth neighborhoods.
I typically look at what the individual is wearing, skin color is irrelevant. I have crossed to avoid groups of white thugs just as I do for black ones.
Crime and economic development
Odd how you think the entire system should be racist FOR black people. Interesting flip that has been made since the days of MLK.
For all intents and purposes, know that the OP also has an account on Stormfront.
Getting back to the actual subject line for a second, based on history, integration's impact on white people was ever only about prole whites. It was never about the upper classes. MSNBC race whiner Chris Matthews can't stop thinking or talking about race, but his zip code in Maryland is more white than Iceland.
Separate names with a comma.