All Senate Dems vote against barring taxpayer funds to fly illegal migrants to US towns

Correct, it is to BENEFIT the people, not to kowtow to ridiculous demands.

Not to allow one man's insane ego to attempt to overthrow the very Constitution you claim is so important.

 

So election interference and voter suppression was ba'a'a'd, but now its go'o'o'o'd?

 

According to you and your legal training? lol
Again, a trump judge said its legal.

 

How is that election interference?

 

Lets say we import Republicans and make them voting citizens. Do you consider that election interference?

 

Wrong.

"U.S. District Judge Drew B. Tipton said Texas and 20 other states had not shown they had suffered financial harm because of the humanitarian parole program that allows up to 30,000 asylum-seekers into the U.S. each month from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela combined. That was something the states needed to prove to have legal standing to bring the lawsuit.

"In reaching this conclusion, the Court does not address the lawfulness of the Program," Tipton wrote."

 

No, but of course that has nothing relative to what’s happening. These people can’t vote, and fleeing communism could mean they aren’t exactly liberals. Who do Cubans tend to vote for?

 

But a denier..... and an an inversion thinker, democrats which blames the opposition for the things they do.....

 

Fair enough. Legal until proven otherwise

 

What are you even talking about?

This thread is about Biden and Senate Democrats desire to seve non-americans.

This has nothing to do with Trump.

 

How is this policy beneficial to the United States?

 

From the trump judge
Tipton questioned how Texas could be claiming financial losses if data showed that the parole program actually reduced the number of migrants coming into the U.S.

 

The post I replied to made them voting citizens. I believe Cubans mostly vote Republican.

 

Kinda missed the other part of the quote:

Tipton repeatedly asked Texas’ lawyers how the state could be claiming financial losses if data shows that the parole program has actually reduced the number of migrants coming into the U.S.

“In the last six moths you’ve actually spent less on people from those countries,” Tipton told Texas’ lawyers.

Only from THOSE countries.

Even still, that doesn't answer the question.

How does that rule change benefit the citizens of the US?

Even still, you are saying "this program helps Americans by reducing the costs for Immigration costs Biden created"

Is this really the best you have?

 

Yah if you don’t care about people who aren’t from hare, there’s no answer you’ll accept.

 

It’s not. The immigration exemption was created by the votes of Cuban American citizens of Florida so they could bring family members across from Cuba with a minimum of red tape . It’s purely political .

Just ask Marco Rubio.

 

That's the point isn't it though?

The motivations to support this are based upon helping people from other countries, not taking action to help our citizens or our country.

I support more immigration and affording people an opportunity here of the American dream. But I also support rules and policies that support that in a format that doesn't negatively impact citizens.

We need immigration reform, not immigration policies that skirt around the intent of the policy.

Immigration can be a good thing if done correctly.

 

All of our policies are like that. DACA, birthright citizenship...

Why can we fix the rules and implement a policy that actually works.

 

So you agree immigrants benefit america? These people aren’t breaking our laws. So why the opposition?

 

100% always have

They aren't breaking our CURRENT laws, that have been modified to serve an agenda that is not remotely based on immigration policies beneficial to America.

10,000 immigrants into NYC can be beneficial. 100k immigrants into NYC, no.

 

This country became the leader of the free world because of immigrants.

 

Sorry you have that backwards, it's the far right Republicans who blame the opposition for the things they do.

Almost every accusation by a Republican turns out to be an admission.

 

Aren’t current laws all that matter? Lol
I don’t think 100k were flown in under this policy

 

Like I said, denial and inversion. So, to deny it, you give me a demonstration of it. Fully expected.

 

Yes.

Under a regulated and systematic process.