If that is what you believe then can we get a mod to overview the debate? I'd be happy to have a third party observe and say when someone has not addressed an issue or not.
Excuse me, when the (*)(*)(*)(*) did I do that? Shut the (*)(*)(*)(*) up if you want to lie about me mate. I NEVER use the issue of woman's rights in such debate since it is both irrelevant and as you correctly say is an entire strawman, used for emotional or muddying argumentation.
Thats not the topic of this thread. If you'd like to start another thread adressing those issues, then go ahead., but why put something else in a thread thats off topic. I mean this thread will probably already reach 300 posts or more.
actually we are done. I consider you more important than a bunch of cells. I can't explain it, I just value people.
and you really expect anyone to 'debate' with you when all you do is curse and call other people's posts 'pathetic'??
1. Yes I do expect people to debate me, though I doubt lifers are CAPABLE 2. I only swear when people lie or misrepresent facts 3. Your post was pathetic. Only a wimp relies to a legitimate question with "I'm done".
The topic of this thread is the value of life. I was addressing the claim that "all human life is precious." Do you realize your own post is off topic?
EXCELLENT IDEA I nominate makkede she has proven to be completely neutral with respect to the abortion position
I disagree. I think she is a good mod but she comments on a lot of abortion threads and has strong opinions. Someone who is relatively neutral should be chosen that is, someone who is rather apathetic about abortion. It's ok to me if they are a lifer but we need someone who can observe purely for the purpose of ensuring efficiency of discussion without becoming involved in the arguments themselves.
RRRiiight. Ever notice how leftists arguments only work if you accept their made up on the spot word definitions?
