Bible verses that Christians ignore

Discussion in 'Religion & Philosophy' started by dreadpiratejaymo, Jan 22, 2012.

  1. DivineComedy

    DivineComedy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So what? Christians do that too, and some speak in tongues so nobody can understand them, but only our Jesus says Christians are hypocrites for praying to be seen of men.

    And logically man does get a reward of being seen as Black Stone Idolaters when they pray like one.

    Moslems pray that way because it is a bastard creed from a false prophet that pooped in a fictional heaven, right along with their fictional Isa, that created prayer that way to judge men, to distinguish believers from the conquered, to give reason to slay the poor bastards when they are so scared they mistakenly think that if they bow a little deaper and longer the murderous insane Big Love pedophile MoHamMad will not cut them down.

    The penalty for apostasy in Islam is to KILL, it is right their in their crap of a religion. Just ask one of them more than once.

    And don't you dare give me no (*)(*)(*)(*) crap about it being an old war that made ethnic cleansing of Medina the furnace of hell, it is in their stinking religion today, in their Satanic Hamas Charter...

    http://www.politicalforum.com/religion/224677-challenge-quran-52.html#post1060784782
     
  2. Mehmet

    Mehmet New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2011
    Messages:
    605
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    how bout you hate less?
     
  3. DivineComedy

    DivineComedy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Good advice Muslim, but this is a matter involving the fifth column over here. And free speech is the only tool we have to flush them out.
     
  4. Mehmet

    Mehmet New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2011
    Messages:
    605
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    we could at least talk couple of days ago.
    i have no idea what's got into you but
    either correct yourself, or be ignored.

    i am not gonna teach manners to anyone.
     
  5. DivineComedy

    DivineComedy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So your religion is about lying about what one believes?

    If you believe MoHamMad a false prophet, say it. To do otherwise when one has no respect for Moslem's who slay apostates would be either cowardice or a lie.
     
  6. Neutral

    Neutral New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Messages:
    14,003
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How do you know he's a false prophet?

    Because you faith tells you so?

    Guess what their faith says?

    And now, by raising that simple point, I am a liar? A coward? You are just a very angry man, and please stop maligning my faith by saying its what riving your behavior. You are driving your behavior, not God. You are.

    Just remember skin flint, one of us has put his money where his mouth is and actually chased down terrorists. Guess who was right there beside me doing it? Muslims. Go figure, huh?

    Now, you were saying about cowardice and lying? Stop pretending its Christianity that drives your actions. Its just you.
     
  7. DivineComedy

    DivineComedy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I never said Christianity drove my actions.

    I never said Muslims could not chase down terrorists.

    I never said you are a liar.

    I never said you are a coward.

    I can only ask what their faith says, their Hadith says their "Prophet" said kill apostates. So I can only take their word for it.

    I know MoHamMad is a false prophet because I asked, "If MoHamMad is not a false Prophet, say so." Since he did not respond, therefore, MoHamMad is a false prophet. It is that simple.

    Christians who are "Saved...uh" cannot deny the inquisition, and all the trails of tears, and to never get there again we cannot live a lie or consider it mean or an insult to have free speech condemning our own books and bad churches...

    If the Moslem religion slays apostates is it not evil? If it did so and then Moslems turn around and claim the Islamifascist book is a miracle because the religion spread so fast, is it not a lie?

    If the book says kill homos, then a Christian is a liar if he says it does not.

    What is everyone supposed to do, bow down and not say "Moslem" but say "Muslim" because Grandma's dictionary is politically incorrect?

    The only way an unbeliever or an apostate can know there is no threat of an inquisition is to do some speach to prove the current crop of Christians are not inclined to use an inquisition.

    We have a long history of killing people over words offensive to Jesus, and as a Christian I think it would be a sin not to make sure we never do it again.

    Can he insult his own religion? No. Would it be effective to insult Zeus? No.

    If I cannot say a prophet is false, and a so-called "holy" book is toilet paper, and it becomes being mean, the question begged is obvious; how can the unbeliever who says a word against a certain teen who was knocked up by a really old fart, know for sure the believer will not send the inquisitor to inflict exquisite torture?

    I see no reason to lie to the Muslim and tell him or give him the impression that I respect his book, religion, or MoHamMad.
     
  8. DivineComedy

    DivineComedy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,629
    Likes Received:
    841
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am not going to guess what their faith says, I have no choice but to ask if there is any question whatsoever due to history or book. The same for any "lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender" they must ask, and act to save themselves from being slain.
     
  9. Doc Dred

    Doc Dred Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    5,599
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It was sytemised as you might have found in wiki...


    It wasn't written down like it is today like the sefer yetzirah, bahir,
    and zohar, &c. It was taught not as "kabbalah" but an oral tradition.


    and Jesus would not have been allowed to freak the Pharisees out at that early age if he wasn't a rabbinical Jew , or studying to be one.
     
  10. Doc Dred

    Doc Dred Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2009
    Messages:
    5,599
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    got to be the most fanatical thing i have read in a long while....
     
  11. TBryant

    TBryant Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2011
    Messages:
    4,146
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    It is not ok to take on oath, though it happens quite frequently in the OT, and the angles in revelations swear by god.



    See they couldn't even finish the book without breaking their own laws![/QUOTE]

    Fun-da-mental.

    I am curious what a bible scholar would say about these verses. I know what my parents church would say, and why my grandmother always wore a hat to church.
     
  12. Quantrill

    Quantrill New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    Messages:
    3,673
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Keep reading. I have outdone that Im sure.

    Quantrill
     
  13. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You gotta hand it to the kid. He was, according to my understanding, about the age of 12 when he first "freaked the Pharisees out" at the temple. So, I would say that his first 12 years were well spent in learning from someone the things that would 'freak the Pharisees out'. LOL. Gee, guess that oral tradition has this written mess beat all to pieces.
     
  14. Daggdag

    Daggdag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    15,668
    Likes Received:
    1,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    The thing is there are many Muslims who do not go around killing anyone who isn't Muslim......Islamophobes however, refuse to accept this....to them, the fact that the Quran says to, automatically means that Muslims are all for it......
    Then they turn around and claim that Christians dont live like that and follow the bible to the letter......It's all very hipocritical.
     
  15. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Well why don't we just blame all the wrongs and atrocities of the world on everyone except the non-theists. Everybody knows that the non-theists never do any wrongful acts. For all intents and purposes, all non-theists are Saints ... saints greater than any god could ever expect to do. Would such a notion make all you non-theists happy enough to shut up even though the notion is just a notion?
     
  16. Sooner28

    Sooner28 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    872
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Non-theists don't start holy wars, burn people at the stake, deny scientific findings, discriminate against homosexuals, or curb reproductive rights for women because of an irrational belief in a "soul." Non-theists are not perfect, but they are not generally the cause of the bad things I just mentioned.
     
  17. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Then who is the cause?
     
  18. Sooner28

    Sooner28 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    872
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Religious fanatics. Not the sensible, law abiding religious, but the extremists. However, without the religion to fuel them, their "reasons" for bad behavior would not even exist.
     
  19. Incorporeal

    Incorporeal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,731
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Well, who are those "extremists"? If you know and care anything about the people on this forum, then you have a secularized moral obligation to let us know so that we can defend ourselves from such notorious people.

    You further suggest that 'religion' is the only 'reason' available for 'bad behavior'? Do you have the scientific data available that will add support to such an otherwise absurd claim?
     
  20. Sooner28

    Sooner28 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    872
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    For the burnings and executions, the historical Catholic Church.

    Modern day science deniers, with regards to homosexuality, climate change, and evolution are the Moral Majority, the Family Research Council,Focus on the Family, and the Discovery Institute.

    I also did NOT say that religion was the only reason for ALL bad behavior. I only claimed bad behavior that was specifically fueled by religious belief (such as burning witches) would not have occurred without the said religion.
     
  21. Bishadi

    Bishadi Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    12,292
    Likes Received:
    52
    Trophy Points:
    0

    bump


    to hopefully assist the idiots with the problem
     
  22. churchmouse

    churchmouse New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2012
    Messages:
    4,739
    Likes Received:
    45
    Trophy Points:
    0
    dreadpiratejaymo said,

    Could you at least spell our names correctly….it's Christian….not Chrisitan.

    It's Christian……..And you need to state the bible verse when you make a comment like this.

    Some churches take this literally and want women to cover their heads and some don't. And some churches speak of this in more spiritual terms. I tend to believe both. If you look at the verse…..."Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God." (1Corinthians 11:3, NIV) it shows order and authority and there is no way to get around this…the man is over the woman as Christ is over the man. I am not going to to get in a lengthy explanation…but this whole thing is related to Adam and Eve and the fall from grace. The veil or hat or scarf covering can also be an attitude and showing that you understand the authority that God put into place.

    "For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. For this reason, and because of the angels, the woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head." (1Corinthians 11:8-10, NIV)

    So the fact that a woman might or might not wear a covering….is not the issue. To recognize the authority God put into place does. In our church we have many women who cover their heads, the majority don't. But we all agree on the authority thing which is scriptural. We as women are UNDER the authority of our husbands. And I know what your going to say here….that we are not equal before God…that our husband should whip us into shape and do anything to us and we should just take it. This is not the case at all. God said husband love your wives as Christ loved the Church…that is a tall task. What greater love is that?

    I think this means that when women go to church to worship that she not look like a representative of Brighton Jewelry store…that we not look gaudy or to draw attention away from the Lord. Men don't usually draw attention away from anything…women by their fashion…can.



    I can't answer it any better than this site does. Jesus did not condone divorce.

    http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Family/Marriage/divorce.htm


    What is this scripture? Could you post it please.






    See they couldn't even finish the book without breaking their own laws![/QUOTE]

    AND THAT IS WHY JESUS CAME WE CAN'T DO IT WITHOUT HIM.
     

Share This Page