Boy Scouts files reveal repeat Gay Child molestors

This thread is 28 pages long.

You made the claim to me on page 27.

It is your responsibility to produce the evidence every time you want to use it as part of your argument.

 

Did you know you can change the number of posts per page so you don;t have that many pages? You should check it out. It is one of those things you learn when you read.

Not really. I certainly do not owe you anything. Your refusal to read the citations in this thread are not my problem.

Listen. We all get it. You are wrong, you know they show you to be wrong, and you wish to remain wrong rather than admit that your position is made up nonsense. You have clearly demonstrated a willful disregard for information.

 

It's your position that is based on the opinions of strangers that is nonsense.

I think for myself and unlike you am not easily fooled by lib academics with too much time on their hands.

 

Indeed. I did not expect you to read it.

 

None of the people who molested the boys self-identified as gay. So they only let in the straight guys, and the kids still get molested.

 

And yet, surprise surprise, you have no evidence the numbers are anything like this.

Can someone name for me one previously identified gay who was a Scout leader and molested someone? In other words, one person this policy would have stopped?

 

If you post something I'll look at it.

 

If 3 good Christians cant be scout leaders, cause 25 Christian pedophiles cant keep their hands off our kids, Im sorry, but its just not worth it.

If 3 good Americans cant be scout leaders, cause 25 American pedophiles cant keep their hands off our kids, Im sorry, but its just not worth it.

If 3 good males cant be scout leaders, cause 25 male pedophiles cant keep their hands off our kids, Im sorry, but its just not worth it.

If 3 good humans cant be scout leaders, cause 25 human pedophiles cant keep their hands off our kids, Im sorry, but its just not worth it.

 

Indeed, my citations are available in this thread. You are free to read them or remain wrong. Your choice.

 

Not good enough.

You made the claim to me on page 27.

Every time you want to use something as a reference you have to provide the link.

 

The link has been provided. Two of them, in fact, and are available in this thread.

Repeating your utterly ridiculous set of demands will not change that.

 

This thread is 26 pages long before you posted to me.

That's ancient history.

If you want to use something as evidence you have to provide the link to it rather than just telling me to go find it myself.

 

The links are available for anyone to read at their convenience or deisre.

I realize that at this point you know you have been proven wrong, that your argument is garbage, the worst kind of intellectual fecal matter and rather than just admit and learn, or simply learn, you will keep pretending that I have not provided said links.


You can keep demanding said links. Your refusal to read them, or admit you have, is nothing more than the worse kind of trolling,t hat being ensuring your argument remains willfully lacking of facts.

 

except for the OP, you didnt read...

 

The term "in the closet" exists because of such denial. Does that mean we should then ignore incidents? The OP contains evidence that molesters have been shuttled from troup to troup, and that it has been enough of a problem that the BCOA has every right to discriminate on who it allows as scout leaders.

What they did was wise, and self-preservational.

Perhaps Penn State should have been as prudent.

 

Why do i get the feeling that you find your own statement ridiculous and make that statement anyway?

Interested in joining the Boy Scouts?

 

Ironic that you bring up Penn State since, under the BSA policy, Jerry Sandusky would be allowed to lead a scout troop.

And that's exactly what we're saying: The BSA discrimination both (1) fails to prevent molestors from becoming leaders, and (2) creates a false sense that the problem is "solved" or "contained".

 

There was once a Boy Scouts group that allowed open homosexuals in their ranks. The Boy Scouts became a de-facto pederast organization and morphed into the Brown Shirts of the Nazi Party but that is just a small detail.

“The Pink Swastika”: http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/the_pinkswastika_4th_edition_-_final.htm

Go to Chapter 1, parts called “Hans Blueher and the Wandervoegel” and “From Boy Scouts to Brownshirts”

But keep those insane exercises of logic coming.

 

They LIE to gain access to our children. We have better background checks now,and much more stringent rules of contact with the scouts, to PREVENT lying homosexual pedophiles from gaining access to our scouts.

And stop the ASININE PRETENSE than a homosexual pedophile, is , somehow, NOT a homosexual.

 

Any sort of organization that gives adults access to children is going to attract pedophiles. If the children are all boys then it makes sense that it will be the homosexual pedophiles that will be interested in signing up. I personally don't understand why any adult male would even want to hang out with young boys whether they were a pedophile or not.

This moving predators from troop to troop business is rather disturbing.

The man who founded the scouts Bayden-Powell was a bizarre individual and is believed by many to have been a homosexual pedophile himself.

 

Doesn't that support the argument that simply banning open homosexuals is a pointless measure in protecting scouts from paedophiles? Maybe the past (and current?) failures of the BSA to manage the issue is, in some way, related to their focus on that single aspect.