Chelsea Manning To Run For U.S. Senate In Maryland

So, how does running Chelsea represent the diversity that liberals seem to want to market that they support? Just another white guy running for the Senate.....

 

Wow, you guys really hate science.

 

Felons can run for office now?

 

Really? He doesn't even know he's a boy so how smart can he be?

 

Oh boy...now the Democrats think Manning running is a Kremlin plot!

https://twitter.com/joshuamanning23/status/952605794033328128

 

Event: Some random idiot on Twitter (with 7,000 followers) post some ridiculous BS:

RW Take:"Democrats think..."

(When in Reality--It is "One Idiot on Twitter thinks...")

Conclusion: The RW material is really getting thin.

"Democrats think..."

 

LOL, he/she/? was a man with all the physical and genetic traits of a male. He may pretend to be a female, but I don't have to enable his mental illness.

 

I am pretty sure ghomert knows he is a boy. He is not that stupid.

 

Do you interact with her often? What mental illness does she have? Why are you so worried about what is in her underwear? Please tell us you are not one of those sexual predators who goes peeping around in people's underpants.

 

Not a real one.

 

Lets see, it has a mental disorder, a criminal record, a dishonorable discharge from the military, and a hatred for the police. Perfect candidate for the Dems.

 

Gender dysphoria is considered a mental disorder by the APA.

 

While they are at it -- backing her/it to the hilt no doubt -- the DNC should groom her to be their next pre-selection for the presidential office. It would be perfect and would perfectly represent what the Dem Party has become today.

 

Manning tried to run from what he did to the USA. A convict he was for years. You want sex change to matter? What for? Are you in show business? That job draws some mighty strange people to it's arms. Who wants to earn a living by pretending?

 

They tried a lesbian, why not run a tranny next?

 

What you must understand is that we have Good Americans, just as Nazi Germany had Good Germans. A Good American could not care less what crimes our military commit when in these perpetual war for perpetual peace. They just don't care. Just like the Good Germans did not care in regards to the crimes against humanity that Germans were guilty of.

Once you understand this, you will not try to change the mind of a Good American You may as well try to teach a pig to sing. These Good Americans make really good cops. They like killing, for it makes these people feel good about themselves. Of course, we hung a sh*t pot load of such people, post ww2, all Good Germans. And perhaps some day some other nation will hang these good americans.

 

Yeah they invented a "mental disorder" label for nearly everything, yet they have no cure for any of these "mental disorders" by their own admission. What used to be normal childhood behavior back in the day is now a psychological "disease" requiring indefinite treatment with psychotropic and antipsychotic medication.



But they do have many $$$expensive$$$, addictive and dangerous drugs for every "mental disorder". Homosexuality used to be a "disease" treated with shock therapy and in some cases frontal lobotomy, sanctioned by the APA.

 

Here's more:

 

Well, at least she didn't brag about grabbing *****, nor did she sleep with 3 or 4 or God knows how many pornstars behind her (his) wife's back.

But there is a major flaw in your thinking: the announcement of a candidacy has nothing to do with either the DNC or the RNC, at least at the beginning.

Smart people know this. Do you know this?

And btw, I would not vote for her. She is, after all, a traitor. Just like I would not vote for Trump. He is quite obviously a pussygrabbing traitor.

 

It literally makes more sense to polish a road apple than it does to "respect" a male doing that.

 

Actually, it is not anymore so keep up with your medical training and stop posting lies on the internet.

 

Actually Chelsea did not run very long from what she did. We did not chase her very far. It is not like she went over to Russia to avoid her arrest. She faced her court martial and went to military prison for her conviction. There was not even any real denial or excuses for what she did. She tried to deal with it through pleading her case and justifying her actions and was convicted. She does not seem to be running from her actions. She seems to feel they were necessary as a person who wanted to not commit war crimes, but she did not run from them. Stating your case and reasons for your actions while admitting you did them is the opposite of running from them. It is facing the consequences of them. So you can stop telling that lie now.

Aside from that I am asking why you care. I have stated I care because I feel it is necessary for the people of the US to be informed when our country uses our military for illegal purposes that voters folate the rules of war we have helped establish and are supposed to be adhering to. She informed us that our military was ordered to and was acting against those internationally agreed upon laws. If we want to throw out the treaties and agreements we have with the rest of the world on proper ways to use outer military then we need to have that done through legislation and not by corrupt presidents like Bush and obama. When presented with that information she proceeded upon the chain of command until there was no other alternative but to inform the American public of our military transgressions. That is exactly what I would expect an honorable and loyal member of our armed forces to do when presented with our military blowing away unarmed civilians because they are ****ed up.

Her gender reassignment surgery is none of your business unless you want to have sexual relations with her. Other than that there is absolutely no reason for you to making any judgments or interference with her doing that as per her freedom to spend the benefits of her service to this country. You do not get to chose how our soldiers use their pay privately as long as that spending falls writhing the law. Since there is nothing illegal about SRS you do not get a say.

 

You do not rule me. I am in charge of what I say about those serving in the miliary. I spent 2 years in the Army earning that right. Also cutting off his penis was done at added expense so that matters. It does not imply he wants me as a play mate. I don't do people that feel a need to remove their balls at all. And that includes those wanting to keep their balls. The person doing that is batchip crazy. My major concern is he decided at his rank what needed to be done with secrets. I knew secrets at the rank of E-4 while in the Army that until the Army released the secrets to the public, I kept my mouth shut. I hope you understand he was not some major rank, but in the area of a clerk.

Why would you think I would want sexual relations with a very confused former convict? You seem obsessed with sex. I had no thoughts of that at all. But given he did not pay for it, it means it is a concern for taxpayers.

 

Srs would be a benefit for service. It is part of the payments they offer for service. I think if a person wishes to serve their country they can go through that if they desire to. It would be a good way to give back to your community to serve and then have the fairly simple procedure done. I don't see it being particularly costly to do if your society is not overcharging for some fairly common things. Sure you have a voice to say it should not be a part of the benefits offered to those who serve, but I do not think there is a really good argument against that. For a person who finds it a necessity that is a way they can work for and get that option for themselves

Those people are not batchip crazy at all. They feel much better presenting as the proper gender for themselves and there is nothing wrong with that. The only thing that is bothered is your social construct of what gender should be. I will somewhat agree that giving it to a person who has broken the law as a prisoner sends a bad message about the proper path to getting it done. I would prefer it be given to those who serve who wish it. But in the end I do not think manning acted illegally and I also think she acted heroically so I do not mind they were forced in some ways to allow her to go down that path. I am not sure, but they did not do the srs on her if I remember right. I was under the impression they just needed to step out of the way of it being done.

 

WOW, the Army has changed a lot. When I was in the Army, the Army could court martial you if you got VD. You were deemed to have harmed yourself so it was against the Army to have to have the doctors deal with a self harmed person. Men went to jail over this.

Now we owe convicts a penis removal surgery? And we must pay doctors to pump them up with female hormones?

They pay these solders way better than we got paid. I had to take a enormous cut in pay from my construction job just to serve.

And no, the Army would not have paid on active duty to chop your penis off either.
Are they supposed to line up at sick call to get it chopped off?