date rape is a fake crime....

it's not coercion, it is simply persistent asking.

 

I agree, while it is dishonorable to manipulate a drunk person, it is them who are responsible for their choices while drunk.

 

they victimized their own ability to make good decisions.
Other than that, there are no victims.

 

Patently absurd; taking advantage of the impaired is unethical to say the least.

 

but having sex with a willing participant is not.

 

"Willing" according to whom?

 

Wyzaard, I'm fed up to the back teeth with responding to people who can't/won't use the quote system properly so that I have to use two open windows and keep checking what I did say in the context of the whole post.

And anyway, you are so blinkered that it is a waste of time and energy.

Your agenda is clear when you can respond to Your type of post is precisely the reason I lost patience with feminism after we gained equality under the law in the UK...because feminism is now heading into daemonising men mode.

with Wait, are you suggesting that we shouldn't demonize rapists

Sheesh!

 

Yeah... we men are in SO much trouble; it must be that feminist C-O-N-spiracy!

 

Being blinkered is not a prerogative of female feminists.

Have to say, I have never quite understood the mindset of male feminists who are more than happy to see females getting more and more rights, while men get less and less.

But hey, that's just me.

I think equality is the way to go, not the struggle for females to be treated more than equally.

 

What exactly do you mean here?

 

I'm pleased for you.

Radical feminist proclivities. Hilarious. I've heard you spouting anti-feminst rants for some time, so no surprise to see you wearing your fingers out calling me a radical feminist over and over. Beside you, I would be. Having read your rants against feminists, well, yeah, it all fits together you see me that way. Bully for you, I guess.

You live in the real world while I bay at the moon? A sloppy attempt at prose, at best.

You just complained about me not responding to what you said but interpreting what you said... and here you are with a fantasy about how I would vengefully respond to the not tried or proven rapists. Speculate away... you don't need me or anyone on the other end of you for that...

You like the sound of radical feminist. You must. You keep saying it. Here, let me try: Anti-feminist, anti-feminst, anti-feminist, anti-feminist.... words are easy to type, lol.

Juxtopose "victim mentality" with the REALITY of so much horrendous violent rape perpetrated on women. And you claim to live in the real world.

Not irrational bias. Yours read like sexist piddle nonsense. Hardly coherent and just one long rant. Ridiculous. Your attitude is outmoded / out of date / useless. Old-fashioned and sexist. No wonder you're an anti-feminst. Suits you to a tee. And the other sexist twits on this thread.

Let's compare your description for the rapists and then for the women. Note that the description for rapist is neutral language but for the women it is derogatory. Coincidence? I don't think so. Here they are:

1) "... when men change their mindset and stop raping..."

2) "...with women dressing provocatively and not getting smashed out of their skulls..."

Your regard for women is compelling, truly.

I gleaned nothing sensible in your post. Maybe another time.

 

Sorry, Wyzaard. You're chances of winning are miniscule.

 

I usually offer girls my own breathalizer.

But I can't lie...when a woman smells like Victoria's secret and her lips taste like Jack....that's all I need.

The other problem is some women, like some men, love having sex while drunk... I can even say I have been open to a lot more while drunk than while sober and nothing wrong with that...if I hadn't experimented while drunk, idk have no clue I liked being hit. My girl wants to be drunk while having sex and has even said that sober...

But the moment I ever (*)(*)(*)(*) her off, she says I got her drunk and had sex with her, and I lose my carreer according to what some on here suggest is the line.

The definition of rape shouldn't be determined simply by level of regret the next day....it should have clearly defined definitions like forced, drugged without her knowledge, under a certain age...not "dang, I shouldn't have cheated on my bf.

Funny thing, guys use the drunk excuse for cheating on their gfs but apparently girls can

 

The definition is based on coercion.

Just rambling again?

 

that's nice, it's not coercion.

 

The law disagrees with you; you are not above the law.

 

according to the drunk participants who thought it was a good idea at the time

 

The word filter is not to be avoided.

It's based on coercion.

 

Again, everytime a guy propositions sex, there's coercion....so how much alcohol must be involved before she can be allowed to say she's impaired? .08? A shot of nyquil....eating a beer battered shrimp?

 

I'm not...that's what I call her....seriously...its an inside joke that maybe doesn't translate.... when I met her, I called her that on accident in front of her bf. I was saying it in and meant to say (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)....but I stutter and that's how it came out.... and her bfs reaction is why I got in and he didnt

 

the law said slavery was legal.
the law says gays can't marry in many states.
The law didn't let women vote.

the law is a stupid basis for debate.

 

Exactly....and many wrong laws have been overturned for many reasons....

Allowing women to claim rape for revenge, regret, monetary gain because they had one beer should be just as unacceptable as not allowing kids drafted to Vietnam not vote because they were under 21, the legal voting age at one time

 

Gwendoline,

As I have already said to Wyzaard, I'm fed up to the back teeth with responding to people who can't/won't use the quote system properly so that I have to use two open windows and keep checking what I did say in the context of the whole post.

And, as I responded to Wyzaard.....And anyway, you are so blinkered that it is a waste of time and energy.

 

Correction: your chances of not trolling are minuscule.

 

According to which participants?