Do Americans Support Impeaching President Trump?

You are the one who claimed that 40% of House Republicans left their job since 2016 because of reasons wholly unrelated to Trump.

And I can absolutely support the 64% claim. But you don't believe any polling data is accurate, so I know you are going to ignore the CNN exit polls as well:

 

I am going to take your opinion with a grain of salt and instead listen to those people who study polling data for a living.

 

I asked first

Why should Presidents ignore clear cases of conflicts of interest at the least, bribery and extortion almost on it's face?

 

They should not and that is why Trump should be impeached because he engaged in a clear case of a conflict of interest at the least, bribery and extortion almost on its face.

Now it's your turn to answer.

Why would Presidents go to the leader of a foreign government while simultaneously and unilaterally withholding hundreds of millions in military aid to request assistance against a domestic political opponent for an issue about which multiple agencies and investigators have found zero evidence of wrongdoing instead of approaching his domestic investigative agencies if the evidence is so "clear?"

 

1. Biden isn't Trump's political opponent. Trump's political opponent will be whoever the Democrats nominate, which is not known yet.
2. There is no connection between the aid being frozen and the phone call.

 

How many threads are you going to start on the same topic? This was yesterday.

http://politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/support-for-impeaching-trump-hits-new-high.562349/

 

Trump is also getting triggered by all of the bad polling data.

 

All that goes away, just like last time, when the people realize the Democrats/MSM are just lying to them again.

This "Whistle Blower Complaint" will end up just like the "Clinton/Steele Dossier", exposed as total rubbish. It will likely take the name of "Schiff Complaint".

 

CNN poll? You should be posting in the humor section...

 

1.) Biden is a political opponent. He has been on TV in debates, has been campaigning across the country, and has been polling at the top of the Democratic field until very recently. You just created this definition of what constitutes a political opponent out of thin air.
2.) You have zero factual basis to say that, so it's just bias and wishful thinking.

 

Fox News:

ABC:

CBS:


Now, find another excuse for pretending that Trump had zero impact on the reason why 40% of House Republicans have left their job since he took office.

 

1. Biden is not Trump's political opponent because HE IS NOT THE FRICKING DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE!!!
2. And you left-wingers have zero factual basis to say trump held up funds to pressure Ukraine.

 

Do you even read that nonsense? The numbers are all over the board, what sort of idiot would take that seriously?

 

He is a candidate for president. That makes him an opponent. He is not THE opponent, he is A opponent.

We know he held up funds. We know he pressured Ukraine to investigate the Bidens even after their own criminal investigation had moved on. We know both of these things occurred in the same timeframe. It doesn't take a genius to connect the dots.

 

And today you said that 64%, 65%, 65%, and "nearly two thirds" is all over the place.

You must have a unique definition of idiot.

 

What does any of that have to do with 40% What factors are you ignoring?

 

If we are to take the poll at face value, we would have to admit than Democrats are not concerned with legal standing and made their choice out of emotions.

 

Say it with me, 2/3rds of voters cast their vote in 2018 as a message to Trump.

 

Feel free to elaborate on that logic if you want because it isn't clear to me.

 

That isn't what was said, the question was if Trump was a factor. Can you people at least try to be honest once a day?

 

And now you want to pretend that an overwhelming majority of Americans saying that Trump was a factor in their vote does not mean that Trump was a factor.

Talk about honesty.

 

Sure. The poll does not ask why. I don't like Trump, but this is just an attempt to cover up the steaming pile of candidates the dems mustered up. As bad as Trump is, he is still the lesser of evils.

 

No evidence while Biden BRAGGED about it. And now we know that when he and his son traveled to China Hunter introduced his father the Vice-President to his Chinese oligarth's who 10 days later invested $1,500,000,000 is his investment firm, but of he never discuss business with his father.

Because it is the Presidents job to protect such taxpayer money from being use corruptly and your claim it was investigated and no evidence is false. When did the US law enforcement investigate it?

 

Biden did not brag about anything remotely close to a conflict of interest, bribery, or extortion. What personal benefit did he get? And your desperation to defend Trump is really reaching epic levels when you start trying to talk about China.

Should we talk about China giving trademarks to Ivanka Trump after Trump won the Presidency as well?

And once again, if the President's job is to protect taxpayer money from being used corruptly, then HE SHOULD NOT HAVE USED THE TAXPAYER MONEY IN A CORRUPT FASHION. And it is a corrupt fashion to unilaterally and simultaneously hold up hundreds of millions in taxpayer money until he can get assurance that a foreign government will investigate a domestic political opponent about an issue for which multiple investigative agencies have found zero evidence of wrongdoing - especially when you choose to go through a foreign leader instead of your own domestic investigative agencies.

 

And Obama was the reason for Democrats losing the house in 2010 and Obama still got re-elected in 2012.