Doctoral Student kicked out because she does not believe gays are born that way

I am appaled by the intollerance shown by Universities........

 

You can't be serious.

I suppose in the perfect lib world every person would be a liberal where peace and tranquillity abound.

How sad that libs have become so insecure and closed minded.

But i guess that is the price we pay for letting vermin infest our universities.

- - - Updated - - -

She was not in a movie theater.

It was a classroom where ideas are supposed to be exchanged and explored.

But intolerant libs have no time for any opinions other than their own.

 

Is Roosevelt University a a dedicated godless homosexual college?

If so then expelling any student who is not gay makes sense.

As for Grace University the lesbian knew its position on homosexuality before she decided to enroll there.

 

the class was not one where she was teaching, she was being taught, if she was being disruptive it's not fair to others that came there to learn

 

people have no choice what their race or who they are sexually attracted too - though I am not sure I made such a comparison, the comparison was based on a person disrupting the class

.

 

she was not silenced, she can go on and on about her beliefs all she wants, just not in their classroom

 

The professor asked her a question and then popped a cork when he didn't get the answer he expected.

Only in lib la la land is it disruptive to have opinions not certified by the gay and lesbian agenda.

- - - Updated - - -

Well yes.

But until homosexuals took over the schools more than one point of view was allowed to be heard.

 

So gay men who are attracted to little boys should be excused protected in the perfect lib world?

Not even libs would go that far.

No one can stop gay men from their sexual fantasies but we don't have to pretend it is normal or healthy either.

 

no, it's a crime to rape a child, doesn't mater if your homo or hetero sexual

 

It used to be a crime for two people with the homosexual birth defect to poke each other in the butt.

However 5 dictators on the US Supreme Court made it legal.

 

So if it is institutionalized intollerance that makes it okay?

 

Government used to tell a man and his wife that they couldn't have anal sex in the privacy their bedroom in Texas.

Then the Supreme Court ruled that all Americans are afforded certain rights of privacy and the Big Brother doesn't belong in our bedrooms.

However, if anyone here wants the police poking around in their bedrooms- just invite them.

- - - Updated - - -

So you think that straight men who are attracted to little girls should be excused and protected in the perfect Conservative world?

No one can stop straight men from their sexual fantasies but we don't have to pretend its normal or healthy either.

 

I can't find these sources on this thread. Can you provide a link as I asked?

I did not see this source mentioned on this thread. Can you provide a link as I asked?

I can't know until I see what they say.

 

I think a private college dedicated to and for homosexuals could kick straight students out if they applied under false pretenses.

IAW if the prerequisite for admission was that every student must have the homosexual birth defect then a straight student would be a disruption.

But in the case of the Christian college they didn't know the student was a homosexual when she was admitted and would be a disruption to a university dedicated to Christian principles of marriage only between a man and a woman.

Or in her case having sex outside of marriage.

There could be exceptions to that such as an admission of sin and a change of heart that led to repentance but I don't think this girl was willing to give up her homosexual habits.

 

there is a huge difference between consensual sex between two adults and raping a child.. huge difference

it was also illegal for a husband to have sex anyway other then missionary, stupid control freak nuts make those kinda laws


.

 

So if it is institutionalized intolerance that makes it okay?

 

We KNOW you "believe" that.

But schools, unlike churches, are best teaching their curriculum based on the best SCIENCE of the time, and SCIENCE is saying that gay is NOT a "choice".

So students who BELIEVE the Law of Gravity is a fraud and raise hell about it in a classroom should graduate?

Its so funny how the Righties like to make science a matter of how they "feel". And how often how the Righties "feel" is to get rid of people who wish to live their OWN lives the way they wish.

You DO realize NO ONE on the left is demanding YOU become gay or get gay-married?

 

If you want the govt having police barging into consenting adults' homes and nanny-stating them like that, while claiming to be "small govt", then I'd say that'd make you a dictator.

Most people left or right aren't dumb enough to want a police state like that. What next, you want them barging into your home and making sure you aren't giving your children soda over 16 ounces, or any 'junk food' which isn't personally approved by Michelle Obama? Maybe you'd like China better.

How old are you really? You're starting to sound like a conservative version of "liberalminority". I'm not even on the gay "affirmative action" bandwagon and even I can laugh at how stupid this post is.

 

If it was a private college they can admit or expel a student or fire an employee for more or less any reason (unless they're under some type of contract). If she wants to file a discrimination lawsuit and thinks she has a case, she's more than welcome to. Doesn't matter if the staff is intolerant, because private institutions aren't required to be tolerant. I for one wouldn't want to attend a snotty liberal school which has uptight staff who expell anyone who dares offend them - just like I can't see why a gay person would want to attend a Catholic school which believes they're living in mortal sin.

Just like Catholic institutions aren't obligated to hire openly gay employees, or admit openly gay students. Private sector rights go both ways - this article wasn't about a public school so it's irrelevant.

 

Ms. John-Charles should have kept her opinions on gays to herself but she got into trouble by making negative comments about gay people in an ethics class and her conduct was also unprofessional. She is a highly-paid high school teacher ($70,000+) with two master's degrees and the absence of the Ed.D would not harm her future career. Some black teachers do have intolerant views on race or sexual orientation and the problem had to be addressed properly.

 

So in other words you have no problem being a complete hypocrite.

Expel the gay student praise the intolerant.

 

Doctoral Student kicked out because she does not believe gays are born that way

Now, I'll bet she's questioning whether or not certain folks were born yesterday.

 

Her reasons are quite scientific,
and the reaction is quite racial, I think they are more human there
than science academics.

 

The only legal difference is how the high Court sees it.

We used to think that homosexual marriage" was such a preposterous idea that no one would ever take it seriously.

But five wacko judges on the Supreme Court take it seriously despite what the general public thinks about it.

Those same misfits in black robes could just as easily decide that 10 year old boy are old enough to consent to have sex with their 40 year old gym teacher and society be damned if the public doesn't like it.

 

I don't necessarily want the police breaking down bedroom doors trying to catch adults in the act of having homosexual sex with each other.

But at the same time I don't want those perverts having show and tell with my children in the public schools in the name of "tolerance" or "diversity" which is what the homosexuals are moving towards now that their strange sexual practices have become legalized.