Does the Bible support forceful coercion as a means to true morality?

It is also very common for godless so-called social-anarchists, libertarians, and commies to use atheist belief as justification to control others ability to have their own society or house. Sometimes the Ron Pods talk secession and would love a tyranny of nine appointed for life Platonic Philosopher Kings passing laws like some homos want.

Putin comes into the house and says nobody can speak homo thoughts, and that is coercion because without speech one cannot change. The social-anarchist or libertarian Ron Pod comes into the house and says by their establishment of righteous belief regardless of what we vote for nobody can have a room with income taxes or Obamacare, or a FED, but must accept pubescent prostitutes, John Edwards talking to the dead, Card readers, witches, usurers, and unregulated let-them-fail-and-take-you-with-them business.

Some people want for every house what they want, whether they bought it or not.

Society is not coercing morality when it allows speech and the possibility of laws.

Society is not coercing when there is a constitution that can change so as to make a whiny Ron Pod need more than 3% of convincing.

Various governments are not much different than the first roots of Aristotle’s household management, it is our house, “We the People” own the various breakdowns of it. We the PEOPLE once owed a dry county (where a dropout recently complained about not being able to buy beer on Sunday, and now he can because it is a human right to force WE THE PEOPLE to dodge retarded drunks), then we owned a county that had a pink whorehouse once right next to the mill not far from where uncle lost control and died. We just do not own the offspring’s thoughts and desires or have right to coerce them into our morality when it becomes their house.

You once were in the land of beer in Egypt, Golden Rule, then the Libertarian said everyone’s being and becoming means there can be no Israeli house or Christian house. And now someone will be totally confused that I juxtaposed houses and States rights, I know they only heard of Aristotle or saw the yellow stained notes; they probably will have a scholarship to MIT or something and spout off that a Christian can own a home, and they do not understand what I am talking about, and I am going to cry.