Elizabeth Warren is Still Dodging the Middle Class Tax Question

Discussion in 'Elections & Campaigns' started by Bluesguy, Sep 13, 2019.

  1. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    36,272
    Likes Received:
    8,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There's no need.
    Your paper makes no claims.
    You'd have known that if you'd have read it.
     
  2. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    60,105
    Likes Received:
    6,392
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I accept your concession.
     
  3. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    60,105
    Likes Received:
    6,392
    Trophy Points:
    113
    https://www.who.int/healthinfo/paper30.pdf
     
  4. ArmySoldier

    ArmySoldier Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2014
    Messages:
    31,800
    Likes Received:
    11,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
  5. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    36,272
    Likes Received:
    8,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Quote the study's conclusion of superiority
     
  6. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    60,105
    Likes Received:
    6,392
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, feel free to provide a paper which rebuts the one I gave you.
     
  7. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    60,105
    Likes Received:
    6,392
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Offer your own evidence to rebut the study I gave you. “Nuh uh” doesn’t rebut emprical data.
     
  8. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    36,272
    Likes Received:
    8,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nothing to rebut.
    No claim of superiority is in that paper.
    The claim is yours with no substantiation.
    Lots of show, no go
     
  9. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    36,272
    Likes Received:
    8,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The authors are evaluating the utility of application of a statistical model to a field for which it was not initially developed. The authors do not even suggest that they are evaluating "superiority" of single payer.

    You should probably read what you post
     
  10. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    60,105
    Likes Received:
    6,392
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I accept your concession.
     
  11. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    60,105
    Likes Received:
    6,392
    Trophy Points:
    113
    “Nuh uh” isn’t a rebuttal to the empirical data I gave you. Try again, this time with empirical evidence of your own to rebut what I gave you.
     
  12. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    36,272
    Likes Received:
    8,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Giggles.
    You posted a link to something unrelated to your position.
     
  13. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    36,272
    Likes Received:
    8,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Giggles.
    I accept yours.

    Read your links for a change
     
  14. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    60,105
    Likes Received:
    6,392
    Trophy Points:
    113
    “Nuh uh” isn’t a rebuttal to the empirical data I gave you. Try again, this time with empirical evidence of your own to rebut what I gave you.
     
  15. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    60,105
    Likes Received:
    6,392
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My links support my position. You’ve provided nothing to rebut them except “Nuh uh”. You lose.
     
  16. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    36,272
    Likes Received:
    8,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Quote the paper's conclusion that single payer is superior, or lay down like a whooped dog
     
  17. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    36,272
    Likes Received:
    8,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then you should be easily able to quote that conclusion.
     
  18. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    60,105
    Likes Received:
    6,392
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Provide evidence of your own to rebut the peer reviewed paper I gave you.
     
  19. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    60,105
    Likes Received:
    6,392
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I gave you the paper. Present one of your own to rebut mine. We both know why you can’t do that.
     
  20. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    36,272
    Likes Received:
    8,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That claim is not in there.
     
  21. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    36,272
    Likes Received:
    8,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your claim is not present in the paper.
    Might as well give me your fourth grade term paper. Equally useless in supporting your claim
     
  22. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    60,105
    Likes Received:
    6,392
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because you haven’t read it.
     
  23. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    60,105
    Likes Received:
    6,392
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I accept your concession. You are unable to provide any empirical data to rebut the peer reviewed paper you’ve been given.
     
  24. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    36,272
    Likes Received:
    8,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No because it's not in there.
    You made it up
     
  25. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    36,272
    Likes Received:
    8,989
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your claim isn't even in there.
    You made it up
     

Share This Page