Even More Bad News For The Right: White's Likely Below 50% Of Births By 2012

You're lying. Quit lying. Whites are 77% of the population. Latino is not a race.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/17/latino-race-census-debate_n_2490592.html

Stop trying to lie to save face, liar.

 

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...nic-whites-hits-all-time-63-article-1.1371772

As I said before, if you include hispanics with whites, the population is over 70%. If you don't, it's 63%.

And conservatives have made it very clear that they don't consider hispanics white.

 

you really need to make up your mind...whenever the conversation is about crime, white nationalists complain about how "hispanics" are inflating their numbers, but now you want to include them because it helps your case....

sheesh....

 

It only changes it from blacks being more than twice as likely to be on food stamps to 3 times as likely.

No mind changing necessary, I never called latino a race. And until you prove that I did, I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't use "white nationalist" arguments in this thread. Thank you.

Now, liberals, care to address why blacks are 3 times more likely to be on food stamps? Or will you continue to call me racist for pointing out the facts that prove this true?

 

Yep. Not consistent at all.

- - - Updated - - -

Translation: I was proven wrong, so now I have to try and save face.

And you still haven't refuted what the poster "Mr. Truth" posted.

 

I haven't been proven wrong! You've been proven wrong! I used census data to embarrass you lefties and you stick your head in the sand and pretend it didn't happen! LOL

 

The simple fact that you chose not to use the quote feature when looking for a response to my post, means you have no rebuttal and want to change the goalposts like you have done.

The past discrimination from the government in regards to black people until the 1960's is pretty evident in the conditions we see today.

My question to you is, since it can be proven that the black race (and anybody who could be mistaken as having negroid blood) experienced systemic discrimination from the government and citizens because they were black, why is it they are ONLY 3 times more likely to be on food stamps?

I mean, what is "white" people's excuse for being on food stamps if they didn't experience the discrimination and bigotry (kinda like your own post) blacks experienced?

Let's see how much a libertarian you really are.....

 

Ok, lets establish a fact first: Do we both agree blacks are 3 times more likely to be on food stamps than whites?

 

Whatever makes you sleep better at night.

 

Ok, so are we in agreement that blacks are 3 times more likely to be on food stamps than whites, based on census data? Yes or no.

 

You make some excellent points here.

I suspect you won't get a response, and if you do, he will some how try and change the conservation to something else. Conservatives love to try and deflect when the facts don't suit their agenda.

 

Yea, I figured him for a troll when he didn't use the quote feature and was hoping I didn't monitor the thread. He is busy now trying to change the subject and hope we will overlook his ignorance on history.

 

Ok so are blacks 3 times more likely to be on food stamps than whites? Yes or no. If we can't even agree on this what is the point of going any further? I'm not changing the subject at all. The fact is I'm the ONLY ONE trying to keep it on this, liberals are trying to do everything to stick their heads in the sand from "blacks were oppressed in the 60s and it shows today" to "hispanics aren't whites". EVERYTHING but "blacks are 3 times more likely to be on food stamps than whites." Which their beloved gov't has shown in its own stats.

 

I only mentioned the "hispanics are not white" thing as a response to your "whites are over 70%" of the population comment. I did that because conservatives have made it VERY clear in the past that they don't consider hispanics white. But as "Glock" pointed out, they sometimes add hispanics into the white category whenever it suits their agenda/argument at the moment.

And the whole thing started with Mr. Truth's post, and the article he posted, which you've still failed to refute.

 

I don't have to refute anything in anyone's post. You've failed to acknowledge that blacks are 3 times more likely than whites to be on food stamps. Do that first, then we'll talk. If I never responded to a post directly, I have no obligation to even address it. However, since you replied directly to me and tried 6 ways from Tuesday to refute me and after failing, giving up and saying that I didn't respond to some post I never even read, I'm beginning to realize that you may not be the most honest poster on this forum.

Yea man, you got me, I clicked "reply" instead of "reply with quote." That's it man, you got it all figured out.

 

I'm curious. When did conservatives decide that they didn't consider Hispanics white? I somehow missed the memo.

 

All the time. Especially when it came to the whole George Zimmerman fiasco.

Hell, how many times did your right wing brethren say "he's not white, he's hispanic!"?

You remember George Zimmerman, right? Fox news sure does. They edited his call to 9-11.

 

LOL. Factor in multi-billion dollars in corporate welfare which is almost exclusively white and the racial makeup of welfarism changes more dramatically.

 

Oh how racist of you.

 

I could just imagine how well celebrating genocide would go over if we were talking about a non white group. Everyone wants to be a racist, but no one wants to be called one.

Somehow, I think when the white race disappears, so will compassion, feelings of historical guilt, etc..leaving everyone to the tender mercies of the Chinese, who really do believe they are the master race. But I guess the left prefers that everyone be dark skinned, dark eyed and dark haired, so long as there's no blonds or redheads with light eyes around, the left really truly hates diversity and does all in their power to eradicate human differences, but it is pretty stupid to eradicate the European peoples. Everyone will be equally poor, equally miserable and equally corrupt, so long as there are no white folks around to be successful and expose "inequality," the suffering that will occur as a result will be worth it to you?
For those leftists who hate "white" culture so much, I'd like to know who's culture is ideal, and will they be running things after my race is gone?
Will the Chinese embrace the good and decent values we have evolved? Will the Chinese be silenced by allegations of racism? Will they form large, influential conservation groups to protect our environment? Will they care about native plants and animals? Animal rights? Will it become legal to eat dog and cats? Will there be shelters, or will your lost or homeless pets be sent to a slaughterhouse? Will they subsidize people who don't work? Will they take pity on the weak? Will they respect "group rights?" Will the Chinese (or anyone non-western) treat gays and transgendered people well? Ya think gays will be adopting children? Do you think Jews will be treated well? Will they provide care for those with developmental disabilities or shove them into an institution? Will they preserve the Constitution of the United States? Your right to free speech? Right to a fair trial? Right to protest? Will rioters (when on the left they are called peaceful protesters) be machine gunned down or arrested and released the next day? I can go on and on. You should be very careful of what you wish for, it might come true. Anyone who would be happy to see the white race and its unique cultures disappear is quite sick indeed and needs a history lesson to supplement all the negative racist crap force fed to us to create the idea that we are the only people not permitted their on homeland and genetic integrity. And last, if we were such a racist country, we would not have committed national suicide by bringing in millions of fecund immigrants who hate America and the race which built it. That i not the mark of a racist country, it is the mark of a defeated, self hating country.

I guess there is one positive thing in this. The human species will disappear quicker after we are gone and earth can replenish itself and re-evolve creatures we have eradicated. I can just imagine the massive human die-off when the white race is gone. Who will care enough to provide vaccinations for free to those overseas in need? Who will send missionaries to advocate for them? Who will send massive aid when nations are devastated by natural disasters? Who send water purification systems for free to those who don't have access to clean water? Who will give a damn about women's rights? Who gives a (*)(*)(*)(*) about these people who are not members of their race? White people. Blacks people care about black people. Asians care about Asians. Who are the only people who seem to give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about members of other races. White people, those you hate and want eradicated.

Celebrate today, then start thinking of what it ill be like to be governed by a totally different, uncaring, ignorant culture. Yes, uncaring. Whine and moan all you want about Christians in America opposing abortion on demand, then think about how it will be when a Chinese official comes to your house and rips your infant child from your bosom, digs a hole and buries her alive, FOR BEING A GIRL. Think about how you will manage to prevent people from cutting the clitoris off of pre-teen girls, or how nice it will be for married women to have their vaginas sewn up because husband is going on an extended business trip. Forget about going to the pound to retrieve your lost dog, he will already be at the slaughterhouse. You can also forget about humane treatment of illegal immigrants, and any sort of humane laws for anything. They won't spend any money insuring that non-native fish don't destroy all native fish, they will laugh and say we like this policy which increases the carp numbers. They will not relocate "problem bears," they will kill the bears and use the body parts for witch doctor medicine. Don't even get me started on the medical stuff. They will not prevent massive smog from spewing into the atmosphere, they WILL give you a mask which you WILL wear every day.
Instead of destroying our country and forming laws which would result in the genocide of the European race, maybe liberals should have just moved to a better country, like the ones immigrants have been fleeing from for the last century.

 

That was in response to the New York Times invention of the phrase, "white Hispanic." It was curious They hadn't really needed to divide Hispanics like that before. Why were tens of thousands of suspects and defendants previously only identified as Hispanic in Newspapers until George Zimmerman, who needed to be identified as a white Hispanic? And how was that determination even made by the MSM? Zimmerman was 1/8th black, so it's unusual to purposefully identify someone of mixed race as white. Usually in American media, the one drop rule applies, which is why President Obama is usually identified as black, instead of white.

And you would never even heard of Zimmerman if he had a latin last name. Or if his name hadn't been mistaken for Jewish by Al Sharpton, who was glad to take up the case against someone he thought was a Jew.

But yes, although Fox did edit a 9-11 tape, it didn't alter or change the content of the recording. You don't walk away with a different impression of the situation like you did when NBC/MSNBC altered the tape to try to make Zimmerman sound racist. Frankly, I'm curious as to why you would bring that tape editing up since the editing done by your guys was egregious in it's attempt to defame Zimmerman. Did you think Fox's editing was a zinger and NBC's editing was just business as usual?

So since you failed in answering my question, since Zimmerman's white hispanic appellation was provided by the MSM, not conservatives, let me try again and see if you can answer the question instead of trying to deflect with Zimmerman nonsense; when did conservatives decide that they didn't consider Hispanics white?

 

Maybe it was the first time you paid attention to the term "white Hispanic" for the NY Times was not the first time it was used.

Also, maybe it had to do with Zimmerman self identifying as "white".

And, let's not forget in the original police report Zimmerman was listed as "white", even though there is an option for Hispanic....

 

I'd heard the term used in the aggregate before, but I hadn't heard it used to describe an individual. If you really want to discuss Zimmerman though there are probably about a 1000 Zimmerman threads to carry that conversation on in. I was just responding to After Hours who used it to dodge my question.

 

I didn't dodge your question, i answered it.

And it's good to see you admit Fox edited the 9-11 tape, though as a good conservative, you predictably downplayed it.

- - - Updated - - -

Right wingers thinking that the term "white hispanic" was invented for Zimmerman is hilarious, but not surprising.

 

If you think I downplayed it you are free to explain in what way the FOX edit altered the meaning, unlike the NBC edit. Although I'm not sure why your obsession over Zimmerman carries over in this thread.