Every House Democrat Voted To Crush The Dreams Of Women Athletes With The Ironically-Named ‘Equality

Yes, mandates for select groups are indeed privelege. No "equal" in this misnomer of a bill

 

You wouldn't have done it though.
Takes a special little kind of **** up to go compete against girls

 

I can’t prevent girls from being on my wrestling teams. So there’s really no difference.

 

How can a male play on a girls team?

 

You don't. How can you TRULY KNOW anyone's sexuality? Even gay dudes get married to women for the sake of fitting into society - therefore, don't you think that you could easily be deceived by behaviour?

 

Which has absolutely nothing to do with a male waking up and deciding to go race a girls track meet.

Why no stay on topic?

Why don't you do some research to find how many males wake up and say, today I will be female so I can race against females.
You know they have to be certified by a professional.

 

Thank goodness. If that were the case, we'd all be like the Amish. Only Amish types want that kind of reality like your side.

 

A hetero is a hetero.
A homosexual is a homosexual.
Some humans are attracted to both sexes.
One isn't going to change the sexual attraction based on the orientation of another person.

One can't learn a sexual orientation. That has been known now for a few decades.

 

You provide economic and other incentives people will find ways to take advantage of it. And it has everything to do with it pretending otherwise is both foolish and unrealistic. True hermaphrodites are well less than1% of the population.They are the only ones any of this should have anything to do with.

 

There is no no biological component therefore sexual orientation can and does change.

 

Again, they don't wake up one day, decide to be female and waltz onto a track meet for girls.
You don't have faith in professional psychiatrists or the education leaders of a state to not be able to see through a facade of a person vs one who is truly transgender?
I have more faith in those leaders than your personal opinion.

 

Prove it.
You will win a nobel prize.

I have never ever been sexually attracted to another male.
I bet you never have either.
And to likely 96% of humanity, they can't switch their sexual attractions. Maybe even 99%.

 

NO I don't have faith in professional psychiatrists. And further you can't force some one to see one. I have even less faith in education leaders to deal with something they aren't trained to deal with in the first place especially when you pass a law that says you can't discriminate against this that or the other, especially when their job is on the line if they deny it.

 

No you won't you won't even be able to get your research funded. I'm still waiting for someone to demonstrate a biological component and that hasn't happened yet.

 

You mean bigots want to keep it down to a bare minimum.

 

I dont think anything.
A genetically controlled basis has not been established, period

 

Who mandated it?

 

I agree, but this has nothing to do with sexual behaviour, which applies or doesn't apply regardless of if someone's sexual orientation is due to nature or nurture. You seem to think that a virgin cannot have a sexual orientation.

 

A lot of it is not what some would call a conscious thought, but if it isn't behavior, then you're getting way off the scientific path. Ask me if I would love to boff my neighbor's daughter and I'm not going to say "yes". You can see it in the way I stare at her from the tree right outside her bedroom window, or the way in which I never quite meet her eyes when saying "good morning!" because I'm trying to figure out whether she's wearing a bra, and what her cup size is.

 

If one wants to compete in female track event. You csn bet your sweet cheeks you csn force them to see psychiatrist.
They are way more qualified than you or I.

I have eay more faith in professionals than some internet nobody.
What is you professional expertise on subject

 

no....queers want society to embrace their behavior.

 

By calling themselves 'transgender'. In fact they are biologically male but that doesn't seem to matter much to 'progressives'. Disagree and you'll quickly be cast as a 'bigot'. They'll likely discover many new genders along the way and ignore science altogether. Beliefs have become more important than science, and not for the first time in history.

https://nypost.com/2019/03/04/trans-athletes-are-making-a-travesty-of-womens-sports/

 

No they don’t. That you think that speaks volumes of what you don’t know

 

Bbut that's discrimination!

 

It's hardly surprising that hyper-partisans would attempt to contrive a fake pretext regarding a gender issue.

The good ol' white boys party has an existential crisis in that regard.