Florida Approves Bill Allowing Classroom Teachers To Be Armed

Totally incorrect, the most commonly sold firearm is the handgun, and by Federal Law no one under 21 can legally buy one.

None the less we also allow those same brave men and women to go into the service in defense of this country and you still do not trust them.

That's very sick and telling about what you think of younger adults.

 

Hey get a clue, what they are doing is already illegal, but being criminals they do not respect laws.

Got a better idea?

 

Insurance companies do not think any more highly of arming teachers then I do.

 

I trust them fine as long as they are in the hands of sergeants and with the firearms mostly being locked up when not being use at least while states side.

 

Your story is full of BS.

Example, after the shooting in Parkland, Florida, killed 17 at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on Feb. 14, lawmakers in seven states quickly introduced bills that would legalize the arming of teachers. Yet of those, so far only Florida Gov. Rick Scott, a Republican, has signed a bill that permits school districts to arm trained school workers with handguns.

Rick Scott didn't sign that bill, it was signed by Governor DeSantis.

 

Uh really, Sergeants are management and not necessarily trained in active shooter response.

 

LOL an troops do not normally have anything to do with school shootings at the federal level or states level.

In any case, the military does not allow young troops to run around with firearms state side without tight supervision so it have nothing similar to having late teens buying rifles at a gun shop.

 

Good try at mixing military with local law enforcement.

Total fail anyhow.

 

Yes indeed, NBC news error that it was the incoming governor instead of the outcoming governor that sign the arm teachers bill mean that it all bullshit for some strange reason.

 

LOL an you was the one trying to claimed that as we allow those under 21 to be part of the military that somehow means that we should allow those teens not in the military to buy firearms.

 

In some cases, it's illegal. I'm well aware criminals (and sometimes people who aren't criminals) don't respect the law because the actual penalty applied for a violation isn't a deterrent. In fact, the very people who complain the loudest about guns are the same people who don't want to enforce the law.

Now, I'd like to see our cities safer, so I'm not prepared to accept the status quo with criminals being able to prey on people because the law as applied isn't a deterrent. As I said, I don't have a solution to an obvious problem that impacts myself and my family. We can pass all the laws in the world, but they don't mean spit if someone isn't enforcing them.

As a citizen who isn't pro- or anti-gun--that is, I'm not suggesting we take guns away from people, nor am I prepared to accept that criminals are running around shooting people.

 

I made no mention of how many guns an individual who dismisses the idea of arming teachers may or may not have, I said it's odd that the teachers you decry arming are all people who have never seen a gun before. There are plenty of teachers who have far more experience than even the police, and those are the ones who should be allowed to carry their guns on campus if they desire to.

 

The very people you want to guard our children? No thanks. Cops love to brag about how little training they've had. And it shows.

 

LOL so you think that teachers could do a better job if there was a general shoot out in the hallways of a school that is full of innocent children?

 

And did so illegally.

Guns have been in schools for come time now, and accidents there are no more common than across the population on general.
Thus, your concern has no basis in fact.

 

None of the limits you seek have any reason behind them, in any sense of the word.

 

An my position is hell no as far as having teachers walking around children arm with firearms.

 

Why do you want people to be able to shoot up a school, without hindrance, for as long as it takes the police to do something about it?

 

Sure there is no reason not to allow late teens to have the means to go on a killing spree if they care to do so.

An there is one hell of a lot of good reasons to have super large magazines in the range of fifty to a hundred rounds.

 

Mindless prattle. Bring something substantive, please.

You cannot present a sound argument for the banning and confiscation of such magazines.

 

No I do not wish school hallways full of victims of friendly fire.

 

You did not answer the question:
Why do you want people to be able to shoot up a school, without hindrance, for as long as it takes the police to do something about it?

 

Yes those magazines are great for hunting or target shooting or home defense or.......

What they are in fact great for is killing a hell of a lot of people as in a pack school or at a music gathering.

We should bring back bump fire stocks also.

 

The ones I've been referencing? Yes. Absolutely. Not only a better job, but a far faster reaction time, thereby saving lives of students who would otherwise die waiting for the cops to enter the building.

 

To me the result will just be far more bullets flying in a mainly random manner resulting in more deaths.

By the actions of most of our Florida school boards and the polls of the public there is not a lot of support for arming teachers.