From Paul Manafort to Donald Trump’s fateful phonecall

He was reporting to a President who was pilfering from the Ukrainian economy, principally from sales of petroleum products for hard dollars.

That President did not want any investigations of Burisma (his moneybag), and insisted that they not be undertaken regardless of what other countries might be saying. He then went on to lose his reelection - and promptly scampered off to Moscow where he has lived ever since. Thus answering the question in many minds, "Just whose ass is he kissing?"

You can get from that some insight into the fact that he went over to the enemy because Russia has invaded the Ukraine to take-over Crimea and a large part of the southeast-Ukraine (that is principally Russian-speaking).

The Ukraine has never had a stable government except for the time in which it was part&parcel within the Russian Federation. (Hitler had had no problem pilfering it for the oil necessary to wage war on the rest of Europe.)

Get it ... ?

 

She's the partisan who refused to give visas to two Ukrainians who wanted to come to the US to investigate/reveal what they knew on the Bidens. Another Obama Deep State holdover, good riddance.

 

Was it Rudy's buddies?

 

Proof positive, please.

Let's see at least a news piece that substantiates what you say ...

 

You do realize that Biden had the backing of literally every legitimate government in Europe, right?

Your narrative that Biden was on his own, and was demanding the prosecutor be fired to protect his son, is just a completely fabricated lie.

 

Oxymoron? No....precisely the point which is why would Biden poke the sleeping? You'd let him sleep and thus have Burisma kept safe from him.

 

Blah, blah, blah.

If you can't do better, it is BETTER to just shut up ... !

 

You' re preaching to the Replicant brainless - and they are legion on this forum.

Nice effort! What courage ... !

 

It seems we are in heated agreement.

 

Better than no agreement that abounds in this forum. And, as some are wont to say, that's what makes for "debate".

One-liners are not debate - which some in this forum LOVE TO POST. Because they have nothing more intelligent to contribute.

(Present company excluded. OF COURSE ... ! ;^)

 

More useless conjecture thrown into the forum for lack of any cogent opinion. You have no proof whatsoever of your allegation, so keep it to yourself.

This here is a Debate Forum - NOT A MESSAGE BOARD! What does that mean?

It means that in debate, if you have an argument or an allegation, you DEMONSTRATE proof of it!

Otherwise, you need not respond ... !

PS: Typically said proof is any information that is verifiable. Which, as regards political debate, comes off the press (news-reports by bonafide sources).