Gingrich is scum.

True fact? Wanna splain that to me?

I guess you have what you are fed by your sources which are TRUE facts. Well True and fact cancel so what you have is a lie

I will just stick with the truth and the facts. You keep drinking the kool-aid and listening to the fairy tails. Oh that's right your fairy tale ends with Ubama going out on his ass

 

the TRUE facts are Newt and all the other candiates except paul are bought off and paid for and here to serve the corporations and the establishment and dont believe in the constituiton,yeah you been drinking a lot of kool-aid thats obvious.

Its because of moronic posts like this that we are losing more and more of our freedoms all the time and american is in a freefall decline cause you will vote for evil since you have wont vote for paul. oh and your talking as though I care if Obozo goes out of office.Hate to break the news to you but I dont.unlike you though I DO care about having a president in office who believes in the constitution and serving the people instead of the corporations and if you vote for anybody other that Paul,then thank you for being a blind sheep and helping to ruin america.

 

Can you tell me a false fact?

 

Gingrich is simply going after the independent voters who liked Clinton. LOL

I think Herman Cain had to quite because his support arose from more socially conservative elements in the GOP. Gingrich, however, is supported more by the rhino establishment who have no moral inclings. In fact, I think this might even be a turn on for many of them who consider themselves "players".

 

Well the issue here is this lying, cheating, serial adulterer is seeking nomination of the god (*)(*)(*)(*) FAMILY VALUES, SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE party. That scumbag Democrat wasn't. See the difference? It's like David Duke seeking nomination of the Jewy-Jew Jew party. Are you people blind, stupid, or is there a gas leak where you are?

If the party would drop all of the fake, pretended moral high ground, empty rhetoric in regards to individual freedom I think fewer people would be rubbed the wrong way. If you believe in family values and or sanctity of marriage then practice that. But don't try to force others to practice that if they don't want. And certainly don't try to force others to practice it if you yourself aren't practicing it. Practice what you preach, or preach what you practice. If not, **** about the topic and talk about something else. It's that simple really.

 

You just took a quote of me completely out of context. If you read the rest of the statement, I made it clear that his marital troubles are insignificant. Please do better next time.

 

The bigger the scum, the better for the establishment to be used as a puppet to turn society against each other and divide us - that is how they profit: by creating conflicts and controversy.

 

The vision of Newt thrashing Obama in a debate gives me a virtual arousal.

 

Gingrich won, Ron Paul lost. Enough said.

 

Why am I not surprised that you would endorse someone as mean-spirited, hateful and despicable as Newt Gingrich?

He may have to check with Calista on everything, though, I see she is on him like white on rice! I guess she's wanting to make sure he isn't already looking for the 4th wife! Bwahahaha!

 

Gullible Republicans/conservatives are the only ones that don't care. They sure made a big fuss when Clinton was doing his thing, but now, all is forgiven for Newt?

Just wait till the trash starts coming out on him, if Reps/cons are finally able to decide on which one of the clowns that has won a primary they think is the smartest - it'll be hard for them to pick one, being they don't seem to have smarts, themselves!

 

I'm willing to bet Gingrich will let this win in SC go to his head. By this time next week he will declare himself President of the United States.

 

Clinton committed perjury, Gingrich didn't. Do you understand the difference this time?

 

Gingrich has some grandiose plans for his big government. He's bought into third wave ridiculousness from a book written by a former Marxist. He's an anti-American sloth of a liar.

 

And we only have your word for it and your word is worth .....

 

However Pops Paul hasn't just lost but placed Last.
However I'm sure his Pal Alex Jones is feverishly at work
making way to prove some cockeyed notion that South
Carolina was rigged also.In short,everything is rigged when Pops Loses.

 

It would require reading and not just listening to a liar lie on stage.

Gingrich, Toffler, and Gore: A Peculiar Trio
http://www.themoralliberal.com/2010/01/30/gingrich-toffler-and-gore-a-peculiar-trio-steve-farrell/

GINGRICH'S FUTURIST IDEOLOGY
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/021106.html

 

The eye of Newt is not scum. He or she is just a little inferior white haired pimple who was bullied in private school. So now he takes out his frustration on the world, and tries to scrounge and grab any kind of money and power he can get his greedy filty hands on. He figures if you need to go to church that means that people are evil, and he can be evil too, and have the excuse all religious queeers make. Their is no law that says I can't take that. And there is no law that says He can't maipulate the stupid and sucker the dumb for his own self profit.

 

He makes the GOP look silly.

Which is a worthy endeavour.

 

you wouldn't be voting for any of those republicans anyway now would you. Folks have had it with the one sided media assassinations.

 

The moral liberal is your source. Now that's funny. Why would I take the word of a liberal web site?

 

Because we want the current head job out. If the dems want to keep control they need to offer up something in his stead.

 

I have voted Republican in the past and would strongly consider voting for the Republicans this time if it's not Newt.

 

How is someone at liberty to personally smear someone without irrefutable evidence and not just assertions you wish to be true?

And what does it matter? Personal transgressions are no longer disqualifiers.

 

And nothing in Gingrich's past comes even close to the man the left and the Democrats elected, reelected, and fought to keep in office.

So what is the issue here, what he does in his personal life is no longer a judge of his public life remember?