Girl Scouts Allow 7-Year-Old Boy to Join Because He is ‘Living Life as a Girl’

The DSM-IV defines wanting to be the other gender as a mental disorder. My apologies for inexactness in calling it an illeness.

http://allpsych.com/disorders/sexual/genderidentity.html

 

They are two different organizations. Believe it or not, boys and girls have different social and psychological needs. One size (or organization) does not fit all.

 

I know of nothing that would prevent the subject of the OP to not be allowed to join Cub Scouts (not old enough to be a Boy Scout yet). The only down side is that he would have to wear a boy uniform. The Boy Scouts allows gay scouts. It is not a problem (as long as the boy doesn't do anything appropriate towards other scouts, just like any other scout). Gay leaders aren't allowed, but that is a different issue.

 

I believe it, I was making the point to those who don't. It was facetious.

 

You know, if someone willingly chooses to embrace their cancer, I don't really see how society has a right to tell them not to. The comparison is faulty for that reason alone; most people actively try to get rid of their cancer, not seek it out.

 

Nonsense, that is just a reason for certain things to be tailored to certain individuals. Just as not all scouts go for the same merit badges at the same time and get different teachings about the badges they are after, there is no reason they could not also get different assistance on things related to gender.

 

Since about 90 percent of all humans are idiots,that certainly means that about 90 percent of all parents are also idiots, so, why should we care what they want?

 

Actually by media-think, giving evidence of prior counseling would both require thought and effort and reduce the shock and entertainment value of the story, it is more logical to believe they intentionally did not seek any such evidence or purposefully left it out.

 

So, by your ASSUMPTION, you believe that all heterosexual boys are having sex, just as you believe all homosexual boys are having sex? Why do you make such an assumption? I was in the scouts and heterosexual and did NOT have sex during my scouting days. Why would you suppose that homosexuals would, or is just a bigoted remark?

 

No. :rolleyes" I think you are purposefully misunderstanding me.

If a consenting adult male has sex with another consenting adult male, he is either gay or bisexual.

If a man molests a young boy, it doesn't mean he is gay. If a man molests a girl, it doesn't mean he is straight. Pedophilia and homosexuality are not even remotely related.

 

Ya sure buddy

 

Well, do you have evidence to prove me wrong?

 

That is a very good question.

 

ummm, same-sex intimacy?

 

Just common sense, anytime a male rapes a male of any age, it's 100% homosexual, but hey call me old fashion

 

Try defining what you mean by "intimacy"?

And are you aware that straight guys DO have sex with other "straight" guys? (Strange concept, uncommon thought... I know; but a reality nonetheless.)

Here is something (related) to consider.

 

I would think that is obvious given the topic of the thread.
Physical intimacy, ie. phsycial sexual interactions.

Do you refer to homosexuals who call themselves "straight" meaning they only have sex with other men?
Or do you mean heterosexuals having homosexual sex?

If you mean the latter I'm not surprised as my position is that certain physical stimulation will elicit a physical response.
The added titillation of taboo practices may add to the experience.
I personally think same gender sex is merely hedonistic and for me, unappealing, but thats just me.

I have no problem with people engaging in deviant sexual behavior that is hedonistic and narcisstic.
I just want them to stay away from children in general and my own in specific.

I also object to the ridiculous assertion that this behavior is somehow noble or equivilant to a family.
Go play with yourself, your boyfriends, your toys - just leave it in your bedroom and quit trying to twist the legal system to enshrine your sexual fetishes.

 

Is that what you and you're friends tell each other?

 

Are you willing to concede that not all sex acts (even intercourse) aren't truly 'intimate' in a romantic/emotional sense? (I would.)

In fact, many women will tell you that being with a man who is not EMOTIONALLY connecting with them, detracts significantly from the sense of 'intimacy' experienced.

And I think that one thing I'm certain about related to this thread, is that the 7-year-old boy (in question), isn't likely to be sexually 'intimate' with women when he becomes a teen.

 

Physical intimacy is a term for physical sex.
I'm not commenting on the emotional satisfaction of the experience.

As for the 7 year old boy, these dykes have screwed him up for life.
If there is any justice in the world they will be locked up without a key or at least go bankrupt paying for his therapy.

This is seriously sick and twisted which is another reason why people who confuse sexually deviant behavior with a lifestyle commiserate with families should not be allowed anywhere near children. (imho)

This is child abuse.

 

Okay.

Your opinion, but not necessarily what is called-for by law or the situation the child in in.

Well, if I had my way, a LOT of families would lose their kids; thank God 'my' will is not equal to "the law".

Again, that is YOUR opinion. Personally, I would prefer that any PHYSICAL changes would wait until the child reaches puberty... but there is much abut gender identity issues which I don't claim to know about. Also, it might certainly HELP to accept that what's male/female about every human being, is NOT completely defined by which set of genitalia they may possess at birth.

Human sexuality isn't as simplistic as some want to believe that it is.

 

Yea, those are my opinions.

 

I think it's seriously sick that parents take their kids to church and brainwash them into believing in God, refusing to allow the kid to grow up and make up their own minds. I think those parents are guilty of child abuse and we should remove the kids from these obviously abusive households.

But that is my opinion. It is not the opinion of any medical professional, and the medical professionals involved in this case are not concerned about any alleged abuse. So there is no need to worry.

 

It's okay to share opinions, as long as we accept/agree that others may (and likely will) disagree with our own.

 

Rape isn't about sexuality. Its about power. A man doesn't rape a woman because he finds her attractive. He rapes her because he can exerrt power over her.