God Commands Racial Segregation--forbids Mongrelization

I'll leave this factual link for your novice pleasure that debunks everything you just said about intermarriage. Once you realize how wrong you were, then I'll be able to shove another link your way that proves GODs chosen people were the fair or white complexion peoples, i.e. the Galileans, and that HIS and HIS peoples' enemies were in fact the jews--just in case you're one of those who thought that the jews were HIS chosen people.

http://www.saveyourheritage.com/what_god_says_about_interracial_marriage.htm

 

Dude, they were commanded to kill Aryans, but were allowed to marry Egyptians and Ethiopians Have you no education at all?

 

Have you no reading comprehension skills at all? If you had read the link I provided in a previous post, you would have learned that GODs chosen people were not allowed to intermarry. Do yourself a favor by reading the 'COMPLETE' link in its entirety before coming back here to make a fool of yourself again. The link is in post #76 of this very thread so as to ensure you don't get lost on your search for the truth.

 

No. You just interpret it to fit your narrow-minded prejudices.

It was about keeping to people of your own religion rather than adopting the gods worshipped by the people you marry.

Ethiopians were kosher, Caananites and Aryans weren't.

 

The stupid scumbag who wrote that said"If there had been Chinese in the area, Chinese would have been on the list," referring to forbidden marriages.

Horse feathers. There were Egyptian and Ethiopians, and, IF they had converted to the worship of Jaweh, they were permitted.

FAIL. Christian Identity twaddle and terrorist propoganda.

 

Hater thinks the biblical hebrews were white ppl.That shows how much credit is in his bank. Zilch, zip, zero. Seriously, there is way more credit to the fact that the europeans were Black than there is to the Semites being white. Time to sing along to the new tune that's causing a buzzzzzz.

 

How uproariously funny .
The last time I read anything like that twaddle was on Stormfront .

Which sort of Supremacist do you think God was ?
By jove, Soldier , you are jolly amusing .

 

r

The Lord's biblical Apostles were all Galileans, who were all fair skinned WHITE people. You need to brush up on your BIBLE studies a tad. I thought I had left that link that proved that point.

 

Look, I never expected a GOD loathing atheist like yourself to actually read Bible passages, let alone to take them as the truth they are.

 

Oh yeah...I remember where Jesus even talks about that in the New Testament....oh wait...thats right Jesus never does.

Jesus doesn't tell people to segregate by race- he tells people not to get divorced, not to commit adultery- but Jesus- and his apostles never say one word about races (which would have been a very different concept then anyway) or not mingling with races.

And no, I am not going to go to some racial hatred site to see how they managed to convince themselves that the Apostles were all 'fair skinned" by any standard that our current crop of neo-nazi's would consider 'fair skinned'.

What Jesus did say was to love thy neighbor as thy self. What he did not say was "Look down on darkies, for verily I don't want you mingling your seed with them"- no matter how much the racists want to claim thats what he was thinking.

 

Here are Jesus's words, from the New Testament....

New International Version (©1984)
"A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.

Oddly, Jesus is not saying- love only one another if you are all of the same race....

Hmm what does Paul have to say
Galatians 3:28 ESV
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

John?
A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another.

Hmm not seeing a command to segregate by race there either....

James?

James 2:9 ESV / 72 helpful votes
But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors.

As a matter of fact...the new Testament is all about expanding the faith beyond the chosen people- the Jews- and bringing the faith equally to all the people. Jesus and the New Testament are exactly opposed to what you are trying to sell to people.

Spend time with the New Testament

 

They were Hiitites? Thosewere the only Aryan people in the area before the Persians came.

 

Can you show us where the Hebrews were forbidden to marry Africans?

 

The Old Testaments were originally written by Jewish authors in Hebrew for Jewish people and those verses were applied to the Jews in exile as God's call to leave the places of their exile, to come out from the unbelievers and return to the Promised Land.

 

You get an A for reading comprehensison.

I would point out that a lot of the laws given to the Hebrews appear to have been intended to set them apart from the people they were supposed to remove from the land. The Caananites did follow some rather hideous practices, even some that we would consider vile and perverted today. Buggery was sometimes employed as a way of impressing on prisoners of war that they had been beaten. The first born child of a couple was supposed to be sacrificed as a burned offering to Moloch. I recall long ago reading some translated fragments of a legend recovered at Ugarit of the god Baal wandering about in some sort of cave and having intercourse with a hiefer that he found there and producing some sort of demi-god offspring. Another fragment describes a heroes feast in honor of Baal at which the main course was a suckling goat simmered in goat's milk. Some cults required that priests be eunuchs. Caananite nobles and priests plaited their beards to give them some structure. The cult of Inana (Ishtar) involved a lot of very sexual sacraments, apparently including temple prostitution. There are frequent referrences in the Old Testiment to "weaping for Damuzi," who was the husband of Inana. Think of the Persephone myth. Their myth occurs in the Greek myth of Adonis. Seems Inana, for some reason, decided to go visit her sister in hell. On the way there, she was met by seven or so guardians who stripped her of all her ornaments and, finally all of her clothing. This may have been alluded to in the Christian account of Salome's Dance of the Seven Viels. Damuzi wound up having to go take her place in hell for part of the year, thus the weaping for Damuzi that the prophets found so objectionable.

The Hebrews were, to put it as simply as I can, commanded not to even look like a Caananite if they could possibly avoid it. The Caananites were too morally corupt to live with.

 

Have to leave you novices with this informative link again, so that you'll see that Christ's 70 disciples were all Galileans. But you'll need to thoroughly read the link to get an overall view of life as it took place back some 2000+ years ago. Love my WHITE heritage.


http://www.christsassembly.com/literature/galatians.htm

 

I don't know of anybody [who acknowledges the bible] that has ever disputed the theory that Europeans (and that includes Irish, celts, gauls or whoever) are descended from Japheth. That makes them Non- semites and thus non Israelites. Maybe you are the first but it matters not. Never in a million years are the Irish going to take over Israel's land, it's just not realistic is it? So whats the point, nobody believes you least of all the Irish and celtic ppl ourselves.

 

What are you talking about? None of my English/Irish ancestors have any intention of taking over the land in Israel. Alluding to Japheth and the land in Israel is a non sequitur to Christ's warning his people (the Galileans) not to intermarry with others from a differing flock.

 

You were the ones who scattered Israel! You will not be allowed to posses the land, that is for the Israelites, not the gentiles (Irish English or whoever)

You are the one claiming the english are Israelites. That's a sad joke that nobody believes anymore.

 

Gaul- means milk from the root gal
galilee- means circle

They are not related. The Israelite historian states that Gauls were descended from Japheth. Not Shem. So, the Irish are not semites.

 

Its like dealing with a first grade class around here. I'm not suggesting the Galileans of old or the gentiles of new claim the land that is now called Israel. Land ownership is not what I'm discussing here. Lets try this again: Christ told his chosen people (the Galileans) not to intermarry with other tribes. Its no more difficult than that.

 

The Galileans were not descendants of northern Israelites but were mostly descendants of "Jews" or ethnic Judeans who came to live in the region during the Hasmonean expansion. Most of Jesus' original followers were exclusively Jewish at the time including the Galileans, which was why he antagonised some conservative Jewish sects and Apostle Paul was a Roman citizen of Jewish descent who spread Christianity to the Romans.

^Were the Galileans “religious Jews” or “ethnic Judeans?”, Markus Cromhout, HTS 64(3) 2008.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&...mcgHzJ&sig=AHIEtbSCti2J3Ngzf3UlmY2tCy_TxbJGAA

 

The Israelites were not descended from Japheth. You need to go back to your drawing board, accept the truth, then you may continue with whatever you have to say because as of now you have the context all twisted round your neck.

 

You're the one that is all twisted here. Show me where I initiated the talk of Japheth, I didn't. Did you ever make it to the second grade?

 

No, Jesus didn't tell his 'chosen people' that.

Its like there is a whole seperate "Stormfront" Bible...