Most gun crime in Indiana is localized within Gary, Indiana, another Democrat enclave just like Chicago. No matter how hard you Democrats try to dance around the issue, it will always come back to your poorly governed cities. In any case, Indiana's gun crime rate is still significantly lower than Chicago's. So clearly gun crime in Chicago cannot be explained by Indiana's gun laws, otherwise Indiana would be experiencing similar levels of gun crime.
I am not a Republican. That said, areas governed by Republicans tend to have far less crime than areas governed by Democrats. How curious.
The solution is simple: Improve security. Hopefully, Americans won't become too distracted by your tyrannical fantasies to take the necessary steps to secure their schools.
Schools without ample armed security are deadly traps for children and should be shut down immediately.
I didn't say anything about a GOP city. I said GOP States have cities governed by Democrats inside them. For example, Louisiana is a Republican State, but New Orleans, which is inside Louisiana, is governed by Democrats. And most of the gun homicides in Louisiana take place in New Orleans. That is why Democrats always cite State-level data, because it obscures the failure of cities governed by Democrats. So the question becomes: Why are cities governed by Democrats so violent and dysfunctional?
The overwhelming majority of gun crime in America is localized within cities governed by Democrats. It is time to ban Democrats.
Gun crime always rises when guns are banned. “The ban on handguns after the Dunblane massacre has failed to halt either the rise in armed crime or to undermine the British appetite for shooting sports. To the dismay of campaigners, who hoped the tragedy would instill a lasting sense of public revulsion over firearms, guns are again fashionable in Britain.” Ian Burrell, Home Affairs Correspondent, “ THE INDEPENDENT, After five years, Dunblane remembers,” “Tragedy has done little to quash appetite for gunplay,” By Ian Burrell, Home Affairs Correspondent, 3/13/2001.
The vast majority of gun crime in America is localized within cities governed by Democrats: Chicago, Detroit, New Orleans, Washington DC, etc. This can be explained by the failure of Democrats to govern properly. Their policies promote poverty and ignorance, which encourages crime. Nobody else in the country has these kinds of problems except Democrat cities. I have lived in the suburbs of Chicago for decades. We have virtually no violent crime where I live. But if you drive thirty minutes down the road to the city of Chicago, suddenly crime is rampant.
The DP has always been dedicated to enslave, degrade or kill blacks whenever it has control over black American communities.
Suburban and rural America have extremely low rates of gun crime. Urban America, which is governed almost exclusively by Democrats, has rampant gun crime. What a mysterious turn of events.
I have to concur. The safest cities with low crime in Los Angeles County, Orange County and San Diego County are populated by Republicans, have a high gun ownership and are run by Republicans.
Yea, virtually every one of these mass shooters was on some kind of antidepressant or mood stabilizer. That is the progressive solution: Dope them up. And when their drug-addled minds snap, they go on a killing rampage.
it's a problem but I don't believe the solution is taking away people's rights. It can be a problem and the solutions can be something other than taking away people's rights. we have gun control there was the gun control Act of 1968 and then there are hundreds of laws regarding firearms the problem is whatever made this person kill these people that wasn't the gun I have guns and I don't feel the need to kill people. I don't think Democrats are doing a damn thing about it I don't think they care in the least. The most recent law that restricted firearms was the assault weapons ban and it was allowed to expire nobody tried to renew it or enact something similar not even the Democrats despite them having majority control and the executive office for several years. They did nothing so they don't care about this. I honestly don't think they want to touch it with a ten-foot pole. I honestly think it's sabre-rattling. Or lip service.
Oh, so depressed people shouldn't be given antidepressants? People with bipolar disorder shouldn't be given mood stabilizers?
Now, I realize you just want to insult democrats, but you don't have to actually lie to do it. There's no reason to take such an offensive posture. We can have a civilized and respectful debate here.