Spooky said: ↑ So you support killing children 9 months old as long as they haven't left the womb yet? Why do they have to go to extremes? Because they have no FACTS. I had one Anti-Choicers admit they needed hyperbole to get a point across, admitting they have no facts to use....
OOOh, ya that FORCE thing ....waterboard that name out of your 13 year olds mouth ! YEAHHHHH!!!! Force, force, force, the rallying cry of the Antis !!!!!....and rapists
Nothing that doesn't require surgery to perform or reverse, huh? I don't disagree with the premise that men need a "pill". I'm not a scientist. I'm not a bean counter for one of the mega pharmaceutical companies, either. Seems like they should be asked why it isn't a reality.
I know the answer to that A male " pill" would compete with the female contraceptive market which is a deep and lucrative one (((((((((Sigh)))))))) There is also the issue of reliability not so much with the pill but with the men taking it
Congress may only make laws that are necessary and proper to carry into execution the powers enumerated in Article 1, section 8. Which of Congress's legislative powers would allow such a law as you suggest?
Hmm. You didn't actually address my question. Which of Congress's legislative powers would allow such a law?
But first you would have to find one the average male would not stuff up And if you think I exaggerate look at the difference between ideal use and typical use of condoms
Stuff up? You mean like teen girls stuffing bras? lmao I'm afraid to do a search. I don't want to know.
Bodily risk, true, he has little, but his responsibilities are similar after the birth. In fact, the courts prove this. I agree. Men and women can masturbate in private when they can't take it any more. Some girls have anal sex to avoid pregnancy and a broken hymen. It's a mixed up world.
Sure and as I said the men should be held reponsible and accountable that begins with the mother disclosing who is the father even if that has to be done by coercion then he can be forced into accountability.
So was that a yes to the question "So you support killing children 9 months old as long as they haven't left the womb yet?"
FoxHastings said: ↑ Spooky said: ↑ So you support killing children 9 months old as long as they haven't left the womb yet?""""""""""""""" Why do they have to go to extremes? Because they have no FACTS. I had one Anti-Choicers admit they needed hyperbole to get a point across, admitting they have no facts to use.... Obviously not......no where did I say that....see, the Anti's HAVE to "misrepresent"
FoxHastings said: ↑ OOOh, ya that FORCE thing ....waterboard that name out of your 13 year olds mouth ! YEAHHHHH!!!! Force, force, force, the rallying cry of the Antis !!!!!....and rapists NO where in the post of mine you quoted did I give any indication of that SEE HOW ANTI-CHOICERS have to EMBELLISH AND MISREPRESENT......
FoxHastings said: ↑ You believe women can/should be treated like brood sows on a pig farm? Wow....you must've had some bad experiences.... Did you know that women are human beings with the same rights men have? have you heard of that???? I didn't use hyperbole....I asked questions. SEE HOW Anti-choicers HAVE to "misrepresent" what others post ...
When used properly it is 98%. If you can't figure out how to use a condom properly there is no hope for that person anyways.
If they aren't killing babies then what's not easy about it? No worse than getting a wart removed or something huh?
