How Many people, at a Minimum, would it take to carry 9/11 Inside job?

How Many people, At a Minimum, would be necessary to carry all the activities you insinuate?

Forget any single detail.
Because if you believe in, ie, "Building 7" you have to believe the whole thing.
All the Crash sites, planes, etc.

How many Arabs/Fake cooperative flight-school Arabs, Military, Demolition, Air Traffic, Airline, Intelligence, FBI and Simultaneous Crash scene creaters, News/Videographers, Fake Witnesses, Actors to fake cell phone calls to family members, etc, etc, Would be Necessary to carry out such an act as you all infer or outright say happened?

And no one said "No" to killing thousands/Tens of thousands of fellow Americans, and came forward? Not one?
No one after the fact either with a guilty conscience? No one told their wives? No death bed confessions?

This should be good!
thx

 

Truthers avoid this topic at all costs ...

 

The truthers don't look at the whole story of the attack. They find one piece and start creating elaborate theories that vary the truth.

Otherwise known as idiocy.

 

This is an illuminating thread. I'm surprised no one's taken the bait. Most of the truthers here are otherwise extremely verbose...

Try not to trip over the tumbleweeds when you leave.

 

Do I get a prize if I guess right?

9/11 Family Member Patty Casazza: Government Knew Exact Date and Exact Targets

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/11/911-family-member-patty-casazza.html

So that means Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld knew and likely a few others in the Bush administration knew as well but they weren't in positions of authority to prevent 9/11. The first 3 were and knew so all they had to do was nothing on 9/11 to allow it to happen. Complicity is the same as being fully involved because they were fully involved in making sure it happened. That makes 3 at minimum. And voila that's exactly what happened, they did nothing. Except maybe for Cheney, there's strong direct eyewitness evidence indicating he ordered a stand down. So he may have actively been involved in the 9/11 inside job, as opposed to the other 2 who were passively involved. I don't believe I can narrow it down to less than 3 at minimum.

 

I know a person who has studied this topic extensively and who totally believes the entire "inside job" conspiracy theory. Totally. (The Towers and Building 7 were wired for demolition, the Pentagon was attacked with a missile, the witnesses are all plants, no jet crashed in Pennsylvania, or, alternately, that jet was shot down, and that various nefarious elite planned it all as a pretext to go to war, etc, etc, etc.)

I asked him the same question one time.

Answer: 2000

And not one ever told anyone ... not a spouse, not a best friend, not a boyfriend, not a girlfriend, not openly, not anonymously, not anyone, ever, nobody ...

Yeah, riiiiiiiight!

 

We don't live in Rome under Caligula, or in the court of Louis XIV. Executive power doesn't equal being able to get away with ordering people to ignore what's happening right in front of their eyes. Which is what would be necessary for 3 people to stop the entire workings of the Dept of Defense, FBI, etc.

Now about the source of these speculations: isn't this the same blog run by a lawyer who's was a member of Fetzer and Jones, Scholars for 911 Truth? The details are a pit of recriminations and truther gossip, but anyone who signed on with Scholars has questionable judgment.

 

posers do not understand the bird perch method.

there is one bird on top.
it takes a crap
it falls on a few birds below
the birds below simply do what they do everyday and brush it off
where it falls on the birds below them
who do the same

the only bird that knows is the bird on top. not real difficult.

 

there are white house coverups and investigations all the freakin time what the hell are you talking about?

 

misguided question.

its all out in the open everyone told everyone, its all being down played, and ignored by the people we pay to give us the truth, hence the 'truth' movement.

we dont need an investigation we have had plenty of that we need a gallows.

 

You really do live in fantasyland, where governments can do no wrong and self policing works amazingly well. Sorry, I couldn't get it down to less than 3, that would be too far fetched for your conspiracy theory.

Based on your posts, I wouldn't make any comments about other people's judgement.

 

So you've been LYING for Thousands of posts/Many Years on many boards with these wacky theories about all the details not being correct, and that it Was an Inside Job!
(Mihop/Made it happen, instead of LIHOP/Let it happen)
ie, 1 of thousands.
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/458597-nist-9-11-scam-exposed-all-its-glory.html

So, to have any Integrity, you now have to REPUDIATE Years and Tens of Thousands of your own posts on many message boards!
AND... Not make any more of them since you now have just declared LIHOP!

And No one could answer, so this string lay fallow for 2+ DAYS before those who agreed finally forced the Loony Tunes, to even venture a pathetic guess as Bobo's.

KokomoWhatever (of fake GIF fame) the same, but even worse, a total whiff.
+

 

Talk about "Loony Tunes", have you completely lost it? I haven't lied about anything. The thread topic asks a theoretical question that anyone can speculate on and I took an educated GUESS at an answer, nothing more. It has nothing to do with what actually happened or didn't happen on 9/11 or any posts I've ever written.

Are you seriously expecting anyone to give you an accurate answer?

Now back to your rant.

 

kinda blows your CD theory out of the water doesn't it? ... you're so simple and hypocritical Bob ... you might as well latch on to the space beam theory and move to Idaho ...

 

It has nothing to do with any theory of any kind as already explained in the prior post.

If I were "simple" I'd be just like you, I would have bought the OCT without question and defended it like a good little simpleton. As to "hypocritical", based on what? That I answered a stupid question that has nothing to do with 9/11? Why is that "hypocritical"?

I might consider it when and if you ever learn basic physics, quit lying about your background and figure out how to use some common sense. So I guess none of that will never happen.

 

NO you did not.
Because an "educated guess" would have been way into the Hundreds or Thousands.
SO..
You had to change theory to LIHOP/Let it happen, to AVOID taking an "educated guess" at your daily claims: Mihop/Made it happen.

I am expecting someone to be able to say "at a minimum, how many", Not give me the whole plot or precise number.
Just a ballpark minimum.
You could not do it, lest your whole life online (and 100K posts) get blown back to the Psychiatric ward.
+

 

? On this board, Bob has been a member for less than a year and has posted less than 1400 posts. How would/do you have knowledge of "all these years/ TENS of thousands of posts/ many message boards"?

 

Because I've posted/seen him on other boards?
Because UNlike you, I can google his handle (and variants) and '9/11'?
Duh.
+

 

42 That's the answer to life, the universe, and everything.

 

He calls himself Bob0627 on all these boards? Or are you counting any Bobs as variants and assuming they are the same Bob?

P.S. You don't have to be a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing dick about it.

 

Talk about psychos, sorry but all your ranting doesn't change the logic, the MINIMUM number of people (that's exactly what you asked) it would take to make 9/11 an inside job is still 3. It's not even "ballpark", I think it's pretty accurate based on the fact that these 3 people were fully aware and in positions of power to do something. One could add General Myers and/or General Eberhart to make it 4 or 5 but they would not be necessary. I understand you wanted me to pick your number but I'm not you and you make no sense.

- - - Updated - - -

You love me that much or are you just a stalker?

 

The reason you did NOT quote me Honestly is you did NOT/Could NOT give any estimate of how many, "at a minimum, it would take to carry off an inside job".

Because you know ALL your daily Drivel/activites, and too many posts to count, are are about a True USA Intelligence inside job AND Execution in ALL it's wacky details: from Demolition, buildings falling too fast/slow, thermite frigging paper, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, you Dishonestly Deflect, and call knowing about SOMEONE ELSE doing it, "is an inside job."
It is NOT.

"Inside Job" means "inside execution," replete with all the [IMPOSSIBLY too Many] faked items I listed in the OP.
The ones which you and other nutters spend all your time trying to show it WAS... Us. Demolishing/faking/staging too many things to count, in hundreds of strings here foisted by people including YOU.

If it was merely someone else doing it, and us knowing (it would still take at least dozens). But if that was the case we could CLOSE this section, because 99% of the strings are about all these supposed things WE Did to make it LOOK like someone ELSE did it.
And that Number IS in the Thousands.
That's what "inside job" means.
IOW, 99% of the strings here are ridiculous and impossible. "Thermite paper"! WTF/So what?

So now you need many techs just for that/"thermite," and then Thousands more for all the other details that do NOT have to to with merely knowing someone ELSE was going to do it.
NO, 99% of the strings are about the details of OUR ostensible inside Execution, withOUT the CTists realizing, in that case/those cases, we're talking about an Impossible cast of THOUSANDS to pull it off.
+

 

I gave you a perfectly logical answer to a hypothetical question, it's still 3. As an analogy, if you asked me back in the day how many people at minimum would be needed to start a nuclear war, the answer would be 1. You don't like the answer? Too bad, it is logically correct, next time don't ask a question you expect people to answer with your mindset. I knew from the start that the question was a bait to criticize any answer. I'm done with this useless thread. It has nothing to do with 9/11.

 

You're LYING again.
"Inside Job" means "Inside Execution," NOT just knowing a 3rd party group was going to do it.
THAT was the question. The question about 99% of the string starts here.
You knew you had No good answer, so deflected/Twisted the question.
And I repeat: your bogus reply (and Dishonest dropped quote) would negate 99% of the strings here which DO indeed focus in inside job/execution technique, that I Ruined with my question.
That's WHY No CTists even ventured an answer until your Perversion-of-question attempt. They all know it's Gameover/Can't answer.
+

 

inside job is a generic term that refers to any level of involvement or association, you are making (*)(*)(*)(*) up.